General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDempsey says US considering use of force in Syria
Dempsey says US considering use of force in Syria
WASHINGTONThe nation's top military officer tells a Senate committee the Obama administration is deliberating whether to use military power in Syria, where a civil war entering its third year has killed almost 93,000 people.
Army Gen. Martin Dempsey says during congressional testimony Thursday that he has provided President Barack Obama with options for the use of force in Syria.
Dempsey used the term "kinetic strikes," and added the "issue is under deliberation inside of our agencies of government."
But Dempsey did not provide additional details. He says the decision on whether to engage militarily is one for U.S. elected officials to make.
http://www.mercurynews.com/breaking-news/ci_23684852/dempsey-says-us-considering-use-force-syria
Catherina
(35,568 posts)Junkdrawer
(27,993 posts)BEIRUT Syrian rebels said Friday they would retaliate for what they described as the assassination of one of their senior commanders by an al-Qaeda-affiliated group, threatening to widen a rift between moderate and jihadist opposition forces fighting to topple President Bashar al-Assad.
The killing of Kamal Hamami, a member of the Western-backed Free Syrian Armys top executive body, comes amid heightened tensions on the opposition side as jihadist groups extend their influence in rebel-held areas of northern Syria. Rebels said that Hamami, whose nom de guerre is Abu Bassir al-Ladkani, was shot dead Thursday in the coastal province of Latakia by gunmen from the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant.
With the rebel forces struggling to fend off Assads troops in the central city of Homs, infighting among their disparate factions could play to the governments advantage. Jihadist groups such as the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant an offshoot of the main Islamist opposition group in Syria, Jabhat al-Nusra are fewer in number than more moderate forces, but they are considered some of the best-equipped and most effective fighters on the battlefield.
Moderate rebels say they have been left behind militarily as radical Islamist groups receive arms and financial support from elsewhere, while weapons pledged to the moderates by the United States have yet to arrive. Although Jabhat al-Nusra is seen as more adept at coordinating its efforts on the battlefield with other groups, a U.S. official in Washington said, whether the groups will be able to set their differences aside and cooperate against Assad is really an open question. The official spoke on the condition of anonymity to comment on a still-fluid situation.
...
http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2013-07-12/world/40527225_1_homs-syrian-rebels-qassem-saadeddine
The "Victory by Proxy" strategy is failing.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)It's a war with no exit strategy that could put us in the middle of a religious Jihad, and the target of both sides, for the next thousand years.
Forever genocide war. No thank you - not exactly the sort of Hope and Change we had in mind.
bluestate10
(10,942 posts)in the fight. It is impossible to see now how the balance can be tipped to their favor without deep US involvement, even to having boots on the ground in that country. We get involved now, only to fly Drones later to kill what we helped create.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)at a moment not of our choosing, changing all existing plans and calculations, except one. FUBAR.
The only thing between us and that is the fact that the Obama Administration haven't taken any real steps in a particular direction in a while. Once we do, however, it will set someone's plans into motion, and this Administration like the last can only plead, "Who could have foreseen such a thing?", when it was sitting there ready to bite them in the ass all along.
Our "allies" in the region are not our friends, and their friends are our sworn enemies.
bunnies
(15,859 posts)Fantastic.