Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
71 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Holy crap---check this picture out of Dzhokar Tsarnaev surrendering. (Original Post) trumad Jul 2013 OP
Perhaps that would have made a better cover shot for Rolling Stone. MrSlayer Jul 2013 #1
Exactly my reaction. n/t UtahLib Jul 2013 #2
That was the idea behind releasing these photos BeyondGeography Jul 2013 #27
Mahalo BG! Cha Jul 2013 #59
I still don't get it malaise Jul 2013 #70
+1 nt arely staircase Jul 2013 #31
To me this is more problematic marions ghost Jul 2013 #55
"Game's over, dude" TheCowsCameHome Jul 2013 #3
Post removed Post removed Jul 2013 #4
In case reality interests you, here is the Rolling Stone story on Mitt from last year! Bluenorthwest Jul 2013 #16
Do you live in Boring, Oregon? Major Hogwash Jul 2013 #19
Emoticons and stupid wise cracks aside, you claimed RS would publish a pro Mitt Bluenorthwest Jul 2013 #22
Post removed Post removed Jul 2013 #25
What could gender possibly have to do with anything? Sheldon Cooper Jul 2013 #35
That's the typical Centrist bigotry on display. 'What are you' asks Hogwash. Bluenorthwest Jul 2013 #54
They killed a cop and shot another one Ruby the Liberal Jul 2013 #5
terrorism ain't no game, buddy arely staircase Jul 2013 #6
He is 6 feet away Half-Century Man Jul 2013 #20
Have you ever looked through pistol sights at night? cherokeeprogressive Jul 2013 #26
^^^^^^this^^^^^ cliffordu Jul 2013 #29
Yeah I have Half-Century Man Jul 2013 #39
or one climbing down from a boat in the dark arely staircase Jul 2013 #28
I applaud the BPD for showing restraint. nt AllINeedIsCoffee Jul 2013 #7
What? They shot up the boat and he was unarmed!! n-t Logical Jul 2013 #8
The people he and his brother blasted at the Marathon were also unarmed. n/t RebelOne Jul 2013 #9
True. And I am not defending either of them. But why shoot up the boat if they..... Logical Jul 2013 #10
They did not know that he wasn't armed. HappyMe Jul 2013 #13
Did you forget he and his brother had murdered a police officer less than 24 hours before? ProudToBeBlueInRhody Jul 2013 #14
Id think shooting a cop and carjacking at gunpoint... bunnies Jul 2013 #15
not to mention the original bombing then the running gunfight arely staircase Jul 2013 #41
Tennessee v. Garner name not needed Jul 2013 #23
They had every right to assume he was armed. because of, well you know arely staircase Jul 2013 #32
Right. But, they don't get credit for "restraint" when they turned the boat morningfog Jul 2013 #38
I will keep the boat in my prayers nt arely staircase Jul 2013 #40
Did they turn him into Swiss Cheese? No? You can buy masses for the soul of the boat. nt msanthrope Jul 2013 #43
They tried, but failed. No credit for restraint. morningfog Jul 2013 #51
I'm sure the BPD will be heartbroken. nt msanthrope Jul 2013 #63
and innocent. bunnies Jul 2013 #11
Yet he's still alive. n AllINeedIsCoffee Jul 2013 #12
And Trayvons dead. bunnies Jul 2013 #17
But not because of restraint. The opposite actually. morningfog Jul 2013 #37
Hindsight, Monday morning quarterbacking, blah blah blah. cliffordu Jul 2013 #30
How would they have known that? The police had been shot at and had bombs pnwmom Jul 2013 #71
The BPD showed no such restraint. Only the presence of an armed FBI HardTimes99 Jul 2013 #18
The dirtbag is still alive, TheCowsCameHome Jul 2013 #21
Exactly. Zoeisright Jul 2013 #34
Why is it noteworthy that the FBI agent was armed? pintobean Jul 2013 #33
If they wanted his punk ass dead, he's be dead, so your geek tragedy Jul 2013 #48
Rings a bell pintobean Jul 2013 #49
Not enough gun humping or misogyny. nt geek tragedy Jul 2013 #52
You mean you applaud their pathetic aim? morningfog Jul 2013 #36
True story MannyGoldstein Jul 2013 #58
Good job, glad they got that son of alive and not dead. n/t allin99 Jul 2013 #24
Lol EWforPrez Jul 2013 #42
Do explain why this is funny, HappyMe Jul 2013 #46
Umm.. darkangel218 Jul 2013 #64
Hm. WilliamPitt Jul 2013 #44
Well said! hrmjustin Jul 2013 #45
Fuck that guy! JaneyVee Jul 2013 #47
This thread reads like a freeper forum Bragi Jul 2013 #50
He exploded a bomb right next to an 8 year-old kid. That's way more evil than George Zimmerman. n/t cigsandcoffee Jul 2013 #56
I'll wait to see the evidence, if that's okay with you Bragi Jul 2013 #57
I have to disagree, I think we know he played a very big role in it. hrmjustin Jul 2013 #62
I'd have to wonder if you were as cautious with your judgment in the Zimmerman story. cigsandcoffee Jul 2013 #65
It would have been funny if a cat had come out of nowhere and chased the laser. n/t Ian David Jul 2013 #53
Title as a painting: Mercy Spitfire of ATJ Jul 2013 #60
Photographer relieved of duty. Good. MNBrewer Jul 2013 #61
Really wouldn't your say his 1st Amendment rights were trampled on ? Historic NY Jul 2013 #66
I wouldn't say that at all MNBrewer Jul 2013 #68
so CatWoman Jul 2013 #67
Message auto-removed Name removed Jul 2013 #69
 

MrSlayer

(22,143 posts)
1. Perhaps that would have made a better cover shot for Rolling Stone.
Thu Jul 18, 2013, 06:47 PM
Jul 2013

Maybe there would be less complaining.

BeyondGeography

(39,379 posts)
27. That was the idea behind releasing these photos
Thu Jul 18, 2013, 08:04 PM
Jul 2013

From the OP's link:

Murphy said he decided to release the pictures because he was enraged by the controversial cover in this month's issue of Rolling Stone, an image that has attracted a considerable amount of negative attention from officials, Boston bombing victims and readers for what they say is glamorizing the marathon bombing suspect.

"As a professional law-enforcement officer of 25 years, I believe that the image that was portrayed by Rolling Stone magazine was an insult to any person who has every worn a uniform of any color or any police organization or military branch, and the family members who have ever lost a loved one serving in the line of duty," he said in a statement, according to Boston Magazine.

He said he hopes his photographs shows "the real Boston Bomber. Not someone fluffed and buffed for the cover of Rolling Stone magazine."

Cha

(297,655 posts)
59. Mahalo BG!
Thu Jul 18, 2013, 11:21 PM
Jul 2013
"He said he hopes his photographs shows "the real Boston Bomber. Not someone fluffed and buffed for the cover of Rolling Stone magazine."

malaise

(269,157 posts)
70. I still don't get it
Sat Jul 20, 2013, 11:32 AM
Jul 2013

The NYT had the same photo. Hope he enjoys his suspension because what he did was way worse than Rolling Stone.

marions ghost

(19,841 posts)
55. To me this is more problematic
Thu Jul 18, 2013, 10:36 PM
Jul 2013

it glamorizes him more, with that electrifying color against the stark white& black.

The most fascinating thing in all this is the power of images.

Response to trumad (Original post)

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
16. In case reality interests you, here is the Rolling Stone story on Mitt from last year!
Thu Jul 18, 2013, 07:18 PM
Jul 2013

Greed and Debt: The True Story of Mitt Romney and Bain Capital
How the GOP presidential candidate and his private equity firm staged an epic wealth grab, destroyed jobs – and stuck others with the bill.

Read more: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/greed-and-debt-the-true-story-of-mitt-romney-and-bain-capital-20120829#ixzz2ZRT6X6wM

And yes it was a cover story!

Major Hogwash

(17,656 posts)
19. Do you live in Boring, Oregon?
Thu Jul 18, 2013, 07:25 PM
Jul 2013

I already knew about that cover -- last year!!

Try and stay up with the current news.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
22. Emoticons and stupid wise cracks aside, you claimed RS would publish a pro Mitt
Thu Jul 18, 2013, 07:29 PM
Jul 2013

piece so you sure as hell seemed unaware of the reality. Why would you claim a magazine that attacked Mitt would support him? For shits and giggles?

Response to Bluenorthwest (Reply #22)

Sheldon Cooper

(3,724 posts)
35. What could gender possibly have to do with anything?
Thu Jul 18, 2013, 08:33 PM
Jul 2013

I realize you are locked out of this thread, but honestly, WTF?

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
54. That's the typical Centrist bigotry on display. 'What are you' asks Hogwash.
Thu Jul 18, 2013, 10:34 PM
Jul 2013

The rest of his team remain silently supportive of that sort of crapola.

Half-Century Man

(5,279 posts)
39. Yeah I have
Thu Jul 18, 2013, 08:46 PM
Jul 2013

Scene is well lit by search lights, he is blinded by same.

Yeah I know nobody takes the time to disable their normal accessories to not look like a punk in this highly unusually situation. Just saying....

 

Logical

(22,457 posts)
10. True. And I am not defending either of them. But why shoot up the boat if they.....
Thu Jul 18, 2013, 07:14 PM
Jul 2013

did not get fired on or see a gun? What was the justification except that he was a murderer and a asshole?

ProudToBeBlueInRhody

(16,399 posts)
14. Did you forget he and his brother had murdered a police officer less than 24 hours before?
Thu Jul 18, 2013, 07:16 PM
Jul 2013

You're right, they should have just taken his word for it.

 

bunnies

(15,859 posts)
15. Id think shooting a cop and carjacking at gunpoint...
Thu Jul 18, 2013, 07:18 PM
Jul 2013

would be reason enough to suspect he was armed.

name not needed

(11,660 posts)
23. Tennessee v. Garner
Thu Jul 18, 2013, 07:31 PM
Jul 2013

Police have the right to use deadly force against a fleeing suspect if the officer can provide probable cause that the suspect poses a significant threat to police or others.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tennessee_v._Garner

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
32. They had every right to assume he was armed. because of, well you know
Thu Jul 18, 2013, 08:30 PM
Jul 2013

the whole, bombing, kidnapping cop-killing thing.

cliffordu

(30,994 posts)
30. Hindsight, Monday morning quarterbacking, blah blah blah.
Thu Jul 18, 2013, 08:18 PM
Jul 2013

Second guessing.......shit.

Out of disses for your bullshit.

pnwmom

(108,994 posts)
71. How would they have known that? The police had been shot at and had bombs
Sat Jul 20, 2013, 11:36 AM
Jul 2013

thrown at them by the brothers.

 

HardTimes99

(2,049 posts)
18. The BPD showed no such restraint. Only the presence of an armed FBI
Thu Jul 18, 2013, 07:22 PM
Jul 2013

agent on the scene compelled the BPD to cease fire on the boat, thereby preventing the extra-judicial execution of Tsarnaev.

Of course, one had to read after-action reporting to figure that out.

 

pintobean

(18,101 posts)
33. Why is it noteworthy that the FBI agent was armed?
Thu Jul 18, 2013, 08:30 PM
Jul 2013

Do you think that if he wasn't armed, there would have been a different outcome?

Also, do you have any links that back up your claim?

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
48. If they wanted his punk ass dead, he's be dead, so your
Thu Jul 18, 2013, 09:36 PM
Jul 2013

whining about an "extra judicial execution" that never happened is quite childish.

Amazing how some people need to make the criminal the victim and the police the villains.

 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
58. True story
Thu Jul 18, 2013, 11:12 PM
Jul 2013

The night when the younger bomber brother was captured, I was at an event in Cambridge with about 50 people from around the country. One of the participants looked up from reading his cell phone and announced "They found the guy, they say they'll be executing him in 5 minutes."

Someone in group: "Executing him?"

Original reader: "Well, they sad they'll be storming his boat in 5 minutes, and I'm sure that they'll figure out *some* reason to kill him for resisting arrest - after all, he killed a cop or two last night"

Me: "I know that's what they do in some other parts of the country, but that's not what happens here. They'll do what they can do get him alive."

And they did.

HappyMe

(20,277 posts)
46. Do explain why this is funny,
Thu Jul 18, 2013, 09:20 PM
Jul 2013

and what the comparison is between a terrorist and Trayvon.


We'll wait........

 

WilliamPitt

(58,179 posts)
44. Hm.
Thu Jul 18, 2013, 09:15 PM
Jul 2013

He came here, got a great education, got my specific tax dollars when his family needed help, blew up the marathon, shot and bombed cops a few blocks away from where my infant daughter slept, lived to tell the tale thanks to the best medical care on the planet, and will now be allowed to avail himself of the protections provided by the criminal justice system of the society he chose to attack.

Boo fucking hoo, bloody boy. Welcome to Boston. You're safety is assured, but I weep no tears for your travails. Krystle Campbell used to serve me drinks.

cigsandcoffee

(2,300 posts)
56. He exploded a bomb right next to an 8 year-old kid. That's way more evil than George Zimmerman. n/t
Thu Jul 18, 2013, 10:39 PM
Jul 2013

I

Bragi

(7,650 posts)
57. I'll wait to see the evidence, if that's okay with you
Thu Jul 18, 2013, 11:04 PM
Jul 2013

I don't think his role in the bombing (which indeed was an evil act) is clear at this point, nor is the degree to which he is culpable.




 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
62. I have to disagree, I think we know he played a very big role in it.
Fri Jul 19, 2013, 12:04 AM
Jul 2013

Yes everyone is innocent until proven guilty and he deserves a fair trial, but there is a good amount of evidence that he committed murder. If found guilty he should spend the rest of his life in jail. I respect your decision to wait for the trial.

cigsandcoffee

(2,300 posts)
65. I'd have to wonder if you were as cautious with your judgment in the Zimmerman story.
Fri Jul 19, 2013, 12:18 AM
Jul 2013

If you were, then kudos. Most people didn't wait for the trial with that one.

MNBrewer

(8,462 posts)
61. Photographer relieved of duty. Good.
Thu Jul 18, 2013, 11:45 PM
Jul 2013

Sgt. Sean Murphy, the Massachusetts State Police tactical photographer who took the just-published photos of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev's capture, has been relieved of duty. The announcement was made just hours after Murphy provided Boston Magazine with hundreds of photos from the manhunt.

Historic NY

(37,453 posts)
66. Really wouldn't your say his 1st Amendment rights were trampled on ?
Fri Jul 19, 2013, 12:47 AM
Jul 2013

Some of the same people who go out of their way to post pictures of cops engaging in action, now applaud his suspension. Is it rights for me, but not for thee??

MNBrewer

(8,462 posts)
68. I wouldn't say that at all
Fri Jul 19, 2013, 10:38 AM
Jul 2013

And if you think the First Amendment applies in this situation, how about people who are fired from their jobs for saying racist shit on their Facebook page? Is their employer violating THEIR rights?

Response to trumad (Original post)

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Holy crap---check this pi...