Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

deminks

(11,017 posts)
Fri Jul 19, 2013, 07:14 AM Jul 2013

Shocker: GOPers have no intention of repairing the Voting Rights Act

So, you schmucks think voting is a right to be equally protected? Pfffffft. /sarcasm off

http://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2013/07/todays-republican-party-update

Dave Weigel:

If you were expecting the Republican-run House of Representatives to hurry on a patch to the Voting Rights Act, what's wrong with you? The Judiciary Committee's Constitution subcommittee met today to talk this over, and the consensus was that the leftover parts of the VRA would work out alright.

Of course that was the consensus. There was never the slightest chance that they'd reinstate preclearance in any way, shape, or form. I confess that I'm mystified that anyone ever thought otherwise. But then again, I'm endlessly mystified that there are so many people who, even now, still don't seem to understand the nature of the modern Republican Party. They would (a) never do anything to the VRA that might benefit Democrats, and (b) they would never do anything which tacitly admits that racism still exists. (Except for anti-white racism, of course. You know, the real kind.) Put those together and the chance of action on the VRA from Republicans was always zero.

(end snip)




1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Shocker: GOPers have no intention of repairing the Voting Rights Act (Original Post) deminks Jul 2013 OP
Repair? Did you say repair? geckosfeet Jul 2013 #1
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Shocker: GOPers have no ...