Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Can anyone explain to me why there isn't a massive attempt underway to contain Fukushima... (Original Post) tk2kewl Jul 2013 OP
it is not as easy since Fukushima is on the sea, hollysmom Jul 2013 #1
but who is even trying? tk2kewl Jul 2013 #2
The radiation may prevent that - the water around there is so radioactive - hollysmom Jul 2013 #8
Mankind has an innate urge to commit suicide. Katashi_itto Jul 2013 #3
Good question Eddie Haskell Jul 2013 #4
It might be partly cultural flamingdem Jul 2013 #5
High radiation might be an issue. longship Jul 2013 #6
Here's a link Eddie Haskell Jul 2013 #7
I wouldn't trust ANYTHING from Veterans Today... Dr Hobbitstein Jul 2013 #9

hollysmom

(5,946 posts)
1. it is not as easy since Fukushima is on the sea,
Tue Jul 23, 2013, 12:12 PM
Jul 2013

containing water is much harder than containing land.

hollysmom

(5,946 posts)
8. The radiation may prevent that - the water around there is so radioactive -
Tue Jul 23, 2013, 03:08 PM
Jul 2013

what suicide team do you send. Many of the Russians who volunteered to flyover died soon afterwards, this is much worse than a fly over. You need someone in it for long periods of time. I suppose they can fake fix it loke BP tried in the gulf, with half a heart.

We are not only talking surface water, but the aquifer underneath.

Yes, it would be good if they tried something, but if they are looking to Tepco, they did not do enough to contain it from the start - they thought they could lie it away - what can you expect. People in Japan are still not even dealing with the consequences, there is a lot of denial about it.

I just stopped buying any pacific fish.

 

Katashi_itto

(10,175 posts)
3. Mankind has an innate urge to commit suicide.
Tue Jul 23, 2013, 12:17 PM
Jul 2013

It's really that easy.

Also we've evolved in such a fashsion that certain problems, especially long term problems are almost impossible to look at.

Eddie Haskell

(1,628 posts)
4. Good question
Tue Jul 23, 2013, 12:18 PM
Jul 2013

I guess it's cheaper to raise allowable radiation limits and let the sea disperse the radiation.

flamingdem

(39,319 posts)
5. It might be partly cultural
Tue Jul 23, 2013, 12:24 PM
Jul 2013

because from what I remember Tepco spurned offers of help. Also, the management was trying to limit information due to lawsuits

longship

(40,416 posts)
6. High radiation might be an issue.
Tue Jul 23, 2013, 12:30 PM
Jul 2013

I have not kept up with this issue at Fukushima, but I suspect radiation levels are high enough that working in the shadows of the reactors may be extremely hazardous to ones health regardless of protective clothing, etc.

Just spitballing here. But that's something to consider.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Can anyone explain to me ...