General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhile real live actual elected Democrats are taking action, DU argues about personalities.
Tell Congress To Vote Against NSA Surveillance Tomorrow
http://defundthensa.com/
If you call, please be clear that you support the Amash Amendment. There is a competing amendment that looks good on the surface but is merely gloss. (via http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130723/01361323896/dueling-house-amendments-over-cutting-nsa-surveillance-funding-one-is-red-herring-to-trick-congress.shtml)
Rush Holt For Senate:
http://www.rushholt.com/issues
Wyden on NSA Domestic Surveillance (who, apparently, agrees with the Greenwald left).
This is a must read. He leaves many clues as to the abuses of the NSA
http://www.wyden.senate.gov/news/blog/post/wyden-on-nsa-domestic-surveillance
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)"If someone told you in 2006 that the most fervent, loyal defenders of NSA & Nat'l Sec'ty State would soon be Dems, would you've believed it?"
- Glenn Greenwald.
Dawgs
(14,755 posts)Autumn
(45,120 posts)Recommended.
limpyhobbler
(8,244 posts)Also don't blame me for any of this. I've already given money to Rush Holt.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)Catherina
(35,568 posts)It's no good saying they don't listen to us if we don't at least make a minimal effort to get their attention.
They won't listen to us, but at least they can't weasel out of it afterwards and say there was no opposition.
limpyhobbler
(8,244 posts)Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)limpyhobbler
(8,244 posts)Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)But it certainly won't hurt to refer to Conyers when calling your Democratic rep and it won't hurt Republicans when calling their reps.
limpyhobbler
(8,244 posts)Possibly could be my mistake then. Not sure.
I've been calling it that since I saw the name used here
https://www.popvox.com/bills/us/113/hamdt101
I sort of repeated it here >
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1014546740
Not the worst mistake I've ever made, if it is one.