Why Is the ACLU Helping the Richest Americans Buy Our Elections?
http://www.alternet.org/rights/154184/why_is_the_aclu_helping_the_richest_americans_buy_our_elections/
The American Civil Liberties Union has earned its reputation as the nations foremost legal opponent of government censorship and defender of First Amendment political speech. But increasingly, this national organization with 500,000 members and a $70 million annual budget has another legacyhelping the wealthiest Americans and institutions spend unlimited sums on elections.
This complex legacy follows a nearly four-decade history of filing briefs in the Supreme Court and lower federal courts, virtually all of them arguing that the door to censorship, via regulation of core political speech, must never be opened. But various forces in the courts, the political world, and inside the ACLU are converging that may prompt the ACLUs national board to reexamine its hardened stance in a more nuanced light, just as it moderated its policy on public financing of elections soon after the Supreme Courts controversial Citizens United ruling.
The pressure went up considerably on Friday, as two U.S. Supreme Court Justices said the Court should reopen Citizens United, as they suspended a Montana Supreme Court ruling that upheld the state's century-old ban on corporate electioneering. Unlike the ACLUs national office, which urged the Court to remove restrictions on independentor non-candidate relatedelectioneering, the Montana ACLU argued this wasnt about censorship at all, but preventing corruption and ensuring Montanans voices could be heard in elections.
Montanas experience, and experience elsewhere since this Courts decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commn, make it exceedingly difficult to maintain that independent expenditures by corporations do not give rise to corruption or the appearance of corruption, wrote Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, with Justice Stephen Breyer joining. A hearing will give the Court an opportunity to consider whether, in light of the huge sums currently deployed to buy candidates allegiance, Citizens United should continue to hold sway.