Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

socialist_n_TN

(11,481 posts)
Fri Jul 26, 2013, 03:34 PM Jul 2013

OK a quick question....

What do you think that Obama was talking about in his economic speech earlier this week about a "new era" and Dems having to be open to listening to ideas for reform of those "cherished programs". I believe I got his quotes right, but if I didn't, forgive me.

What's bothering me is not the cherished programs part of it so much as the "new era" part of it. Do you think he's implying that neo-liberalism (or if you prefer Reaganism and Clinton's Democratic version of same) is the new era and it's an inevitability? If not, what "new era" is he talking about?

This has been on my mind since I read the thread about that speech and I want some opinions from y'all about it.

21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
OK a quick question.... (Original Post) socialist_n_TN Jul 2013 OP
Just that moderate-republican vibe he always aspires to cthulu2016 Jul 2013 #1
So you don't think he had anything particular in mind?.... socialist_n_TN Jul 2013 #4
I dunno, but he compared himself to The Ronald once. Rex Jul 2013 #2
this too. PowerToThePeople Jul 2013 #15
It means he's still determined to cut Social Security. And probably Medicare forestpath Jul 2013 #3
So you two folks (Rex and forestpath) think he's talking about .... socialist_n_TN Jul 2013 #5
I think "new era" refers to austerity for the 99% and prosperity for the 1%. forestpath Jul 2013 #12
Ahh yes, the secret evil Obama decorder ring is in use again. JoePhilly Jul 2013 #6
Right? RobertEarl Jul 2013 #9
Please see my post below. Please believe it before he actually does it. n/t Fire Walk With Me Jul 2013 #10
OK, I was hoping to get some input from Obama supporters.... socialist_n_TN Jul 2013 #11
Clearly, one in which there is no Social Security. JoePhilly Jul 2013 #14
weak sauce my friend. GeorgeGist Jul 2013 #16
But the 'new era' clearly isn't about a WPA style Jobs Program leftstreet Jul 2013 #18
Look at the trend. Fire Walk With Me Jul 2013 #7
? SamKnause Jul 2013 #8
The new era is the one where your kids and their kids will no longer be upaloopa Jul 2013 #13
The Grand Bargain ... GeorgeGist Jul 2013 #17
Anybody else? What kind of "new era" are we talking about here?.... socialist_n_TN Jul 2013 #19
Well his new era must be the end of neo-liberalism malaise Jul 2013 #20
Then why does he warn Democrats about reforms of cherished programs?..... socialist_n_TN Jul 2013 #21

cthulu2016

(10,960 posts)
1. Just that moderate-republican vibe he always aspires to
Fri Jul 26, 2013, 03:35 PM
Jul 2013

I didn't take it as being about anything in particular, any more than the rest of the speech.

socialist_n_TN

(11,481 posts)
4. So you don't think he had anything particular in mind?....
Fri Jul 26, 2013, 03:40 PM
Jul 2013

I'm just wondering exactly WHAT he considers a "new era". When did it start? What are the policies that are foundational for the "new era"? To me a "new era" would mean a HUGE dose of socialism, even revolutionary socialism. Now I'm sure he didn't mean that, but what DID he mean? Is he considering the Reagan changes the "new era"? It's concerning to me.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
2. I dunno, but he compared himself to The Ronald once.
Fri Jul 26, 2013, 03:37 PM
Jul 2013

All I know is how his cabinet feels about liberals and social policies.

 

forestpath

(3,102 posts)
3. It means he's still determined to cut Social Security. And probably Medicare
Fri Jul 26, 2013, 03:38 PM
Jul 2013

and other programs that help the 99%. But he'll use plenty of buzzwords. He's already calling for "retirement security" - which I have no doubt is the exact opposite.

socialist_n_TN

(11,481 posts)
5. So you two folks (Rex and forestpath) think he's talking about ....
Fri Jul 26, 2013, 03:42 PM
Jul 2013

neo-liberal economic policies as the "new era"? That's my inclination too, but I just wonder if I'm missing some other interpretation.

JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)
6. Ahh yes, the secret evil Obama decorder ring is in use again.
Fri Jul 26, 2013, 03:46 PM
Jul 2013

And with it ... the tried and true ... "Obama is planning to kill social security and medicare" translations start to appear.

Why not.

Its been a few months since the last time some one has taken DU down this well worn outrage path.

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
9. Right?
Fri Jul 26, 2013, 03:49 PM
Jul 2013

Maybe Obama really is a closet socialist?

He will be introducing a program of cradle-to-grave care for everyone, rich or poor?

Wouldn't that be wonderful?

leftstreet

(36,112 posts)
18. But the 'new era' clearly isn't about a WPA style Jobs Program
Fri Jul 26, 2013, 06:02 PM
Jul 2013

...nor is the 'new era' about housing, wages, national healthcare, ending the drug war, cutting the military budget, nationalized banks and massive public transportation. Things like that would signal a new era for the US

His 'new era' sounds like the Era of Austerity happening in developed countries around the globe

 

Fire Walk With Me

(38,893 posts)
7. Look at the trend.
Fri Jul 26, 2013, 03:48 PM
Jul 2013


Corporate Profits Have Grown By 171 Percent Under Obama -- Highest Rate Since 1900
http://www.alternet.org/news-amp-politics/corporate-profits-have-grown-171-percent-under-obama-highest-rate-1900

"Average annual corporate profit growth under Obama is the highest since 1900, whereas profit growth declined during both Bush presidencies. As a share of the economy, corporate profits have never been higher.
Unfortunately, this profit deluge has not been shared by workers, whose wages as a percentage of the economy have fallen to all-time lows. Workers also got dinged by the recent increase in the payroll tax, which was large enough to wipe out a minimum wage increase in some states."


8 Huge Corporate Handouts in the Fiscal Cliff Bill
http://www.alternet.org/news-amp-politics/8-huge-corporate-handouts-fiscal-cliff-bill

"Throughout the months of November and December, a steady stream of corporate CEOs flowed in and out of the White House to discuss the impending fiscal cliff. Many of them, such as Lloyd Blankfein of Goldman Sachs, would then publicly come out and talk about how modest increases of tax rates on the wealthy were reasonable in order to deal with the deficit problem. What wasn’t mentioned is what these leaders wanted, which is what’s known as “tax extenders”, or roughly $205B of tax breaks for corporations. With such a banal name, and boring and difficult to read line items in the bill, few political operatives have bothered to pay attention to this part of the bill. But it is critical to understanding what is going on.

5) Subsidies for Goldman Sachs Headquarters – Sec. 328 extends 'tax exempt financing for York Liberty Zone,' which was a program to provide post-9/11 recovery funds. Rather than going to small businesses affected, however, this was, according to Bloomberg, 'little more than a subsidy for fancy Manhattan apartments and office towers for Goldman Sachs and Bank of America Corp.' Michael Bloomberg himself actually thought the program was excessive, so that’s saying something. According to David Cay Johnston’s The Fine Print, Goldman got $1.6 billion in tax free financing for its new massive headquarters through Liberty Bonds."


The Untouchables: How the Obama administration protected Wall Street from prosecutions

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/jan/23/untouchables-wall-street-prosecutions-obama

Yes, Virginia, the Rich Continue to Get Richer: the Top 1% Got 121% of Income Gains Since 2009
http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2013/02/yes-virginia-the-rich-continue-to-get-richer-the-1-got-121-of-income-gains-since-2009.html

U.S. banks in 2012 post highest profits since '06
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/02/26/us-usa-fdic-earnings-idUSBRE91P0N820130226?utm_source=Daily+Digest&utm_campaign=de8376aab3-DD_2_27_132_27_2013&utm_medium=email#.US5jjkXSlU8.twitter

This Year’s Subsidy to Wall Street = the Amount of This Year’s Sequester Cuts
http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2013/02/this-years-subsidy-to-wall-street-the-amount-of-this-years-sequester-cuts.html#.US_yiFwwnHY.facebook

Don’t Blink, or You’ll Miss Another Bailout
http://www.cnbc.com/id/100466032

America faces more than a dozen deadlines, all caused by billionaires and wealth transfer
http://americablog.com/2013/02/america-faces-more-than-a-dozen-deadlines-all-caused-by-billionaires-and-wealth-transfer.html

Bank Bailout 2: Obama Lets Mortgage Abusers Off the Hook
http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2012/02/09-5


Add his appointment of billionaire worker's rights foe Penny Pritzker to a government position and now rumblings of his supporting Summers, a wall street deregulator and protege of Rubin's to head the Federal Reserve (who printed trillions to banks which we'll never again see, while they continue to cut social programs to fund said banks and banksters). That's called "austerity" and it is nothing but theft under another name.

Their upcoming weapon through which to shake their heads and say "there's no money for social programs"? The Bush Iraq and Afghanistan war debt. I believe they created this debt on purpose in order to shock doctrine the country. It's worked so well for them in Europe. Truly.

SamKnause

(13,110 posts)
8. ?
Fri Jul 26, 2013, 03:49 PM
Jul 2013

They are coming after our Social Security and they will get it.

George Carlin predicted this and I think he was correct.

upaloopa

(11,417 posts)
13. The new era is the one where your kids and their kids will no longer be
Fri Jul 26, 2013, 04:17 PM
Jul 2013

better off then their parents.
One where income inequality grows.
One where we shop where we work, Walmart.
One where the US is a global partner with multinational corporations.
And all this is happening at this very moment to many of us. In the new era the rest of us are soon to join them.

socialist_n_TN

(11,481 posts)
19. Anybody else? What kind of "new era" are we talking about here?....
Fri Jul 26, 2013, 07:18 PM
Jul 2013

What did Obama mean with those two words?

socialist_n_TN

(11,481 posts)
21. Then why does he warn Democrats about reforms of cherished programs?.....
Fri Jul 26, 2013, 07:28 PM
Jul 2013

Or getting ready for that. I'm confused.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»OK a quick question....