General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumsjulian09
(1,435 posts)but it is nothing with what the syrians are suffering.
Boojatta
(12,231 posts)Michael Moore's message at the end may, however, qualify for the adjective "annoying." However, I prefer to be more specific: his message was superficial and shallow.
On the other hand, if he has some accurate intuition about the future and the regime in Syria does collapse soon, then I will withdraw my complaint.
Boojatta
(12,231 posts)The part of the video (3:31 to 3:58) that shows Michael Moore speaking:
How is that different from the elder Bush encouraging Kurdish rebels in Iraq?
For a long time in the USSR, anybody involved in a peaceful public protest against the regime was taken away to the gulag. Things didn't change in the USSR because the number of victims of the regime reached some magic number. It changed because of people who worked quietly within the system.
The Arab Spring has transformed a number of countries, but it's conceivable that Syria won't be one of them.
"every bad person out there throughout history has gone down in flames"
In hindsight, it wouldn't have been a good idea to encourage peaceful but open protest by Soviet citizens against Stalin's regime in the 1930s. Stalin didn't lose power until he died in 1953.
FarCenter
(19,429 posts)eissa
(4,238 posts)Sorry, but those "pro-democracy" protestors are not exactly the warm, fuzzy type. These are people who have been waiting for decades to sieze their opportunity, and with the "Arab Spring" events decided this was their time to finally rid themselves of a leader who isn't like them. Who isn't a Sunni, whose wife doesn't don a ninja outfit, whose sect (Alawi) many even consider heretic, whose parliament consists of many women (most uncovered), and who even has a Christian among his cabinet. Is Assad a brutal dictator? Of course. Is the opposition any better? Hardly.