Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

The Straight Story

(48,121 posts)
Mon Jul 29, 2013, 08:36 PM Jul 2013

Child support law 'outrageous'

Child support law 'outrageous' - woman has baby with another man before divorce is final, ex ordered to pay support for it

GRAND RAPIDS, Mich. (WOOD) - When a divorced dad was ordered to pay support for a child who isn't his, he turned to Target 8 for help.

It's legal for the state to order Joseph Chmelar to pay for another man's child and to deny biological fathers who want to pay from doing so. One lawmaker called that "outrageous."

Joseph Chmelar is a divorced dad of two. Not even nine months after the split, Chmelar got some shocking news from his boys.

"They got in the car and they were bouncing up and down and telling me that mom has a new baby and I said, 'Is she baby-sitting?'" Chmelar recalled. "Is she looking after someone?"

Chmelar couldn't believe it, but his ex-wife had given birth. She had gotten pregnant during their separation by another man. At the time, she was still legally married to Chmelar.

Court papers clearly acknowledge the baby is not Chmelars. They show the child belongs to another man and say that man had "established a personal, financial or custodial relationship with the child." The court ordered medical expenses be split between the biological parents.

http://www.woodtv.com/dpp/news/target_8/lawmaker-calls-child-support-law-outrageous

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Child support law 'outrageous' (Original Post) The Straight Story Jul 2013 OP
Court Fail. PowerToThePeople Jul 2013 #1
That is pretty lame. nt ZombieHorde Jul 2013 #2
Here is a question that is interesting: The Straight Story Jul 2013 #3
I would say, under most circumstances, ZombieHorde Jul 2013 #7
The court ordered that he did not have to pay. newcriminal Jul 2013 #4
Do you think they would have had the press not gotten involved? The Straight Story Jul 2013 #5
Another success story for getting the local news involved. NutmegYankee Jul 2013 #6
I am glad to read that. nt ZombieHorde Jul 2013 #8

The Straight Story

(48,121 posts)
3. Here is a question that is interesting:
Mon Jul 29, 2013, 08:51 PM
Jul 2013

Woman has a child and can put it up for adoption if she does not want to raise it.

After the child is born can the father of the child stop it (several scenarios, married, not, etc) ? If not, does he have to pay to adopt it and can he then put same child up for adoption (and charge someone for it)?

At birth - who has custody to decide if the child can be put up for adoption?

ZombieHorde

(29,047 posts)
7. I would say, under most circumstances,
Mon Jul 29, 2013, 08:59 PM
Jul 2013

if one parent wants to adopt, and other does not, then the one that does not to adopt would gain full custody. If both parents want to adopt, then both parents loose custody.

If the child was created by man-against-woman rape, then the father should not have any custody or say.

 

newcriminal

(2,190 posts)
4. The court ordered that he did not have to pay.
Mon Jul 29, 2013, 08:54 PM
Jul 2013

After Target 8 starting looking though the Friend of the Court's files, it dropped its request for Chemlar to pay child support. 10 days ago, an Ottawa County judge issued an order clearing Chemlar of all responsibility for that child.

NutmegYankee

(16,199 posts)
6. Another success story for getting the local news involved.
Mon Jul 29, 2013, 08:56 PM
Jul 2013

It seems that whenever there is an outrageous event, going to the local news does wonders.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Child support law 'outrag...