General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWe need to fix this - we have 50 states BUT currently there are only five female ...
... only five female governors - and of those five only ONE is a Democrat !!!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_female_governors_in_the_United_States
applegrove
(118,677 posts)laundry_queen
(8,646 posts)And we've already had a female prime minister. Women seem much more involved in politics here for some reason.
ancianita
(36,060 posts)laundry_queen
(8,646 posts)Please.
They are the largest provinces by population. They are the provinces that are the most visible when it comes to international relations and economic agreements. I think it's great that they all have women premiers. Does that mean I hate PEI or think less of it because it's small and has a male premier? Um It was an observation, that was all.
Jenoch
(7,720 posts)women were more likely to vote for a male candidate over a male candidate. The problem is about getting women to run for public office more than it is about voters preference.
theHandpuppet
(19,964 posts)Women candidates need the financial backing of not only their party but campaign contributors. Being outside the "old boys network" can make that difficult. That's why my partner and I are supporters of Emily's List. http://emilyslist.org/
Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)Currently, the 113th Congress has 20 female senators, the most in U.S. history.
Democrats: 16
Republicans: 4
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women_in_the_United_States_Senate#Women_senators_for_the_113th_Congress
niyad
(113,325 posts)Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)The first paragraph on that links says: ... there are currently 78 women (constituting 17.9% of all representatives)
I wonder if the list further down the page that says 82 includes some of those that were there only until January 3, 2013 - and left because they lost their seat.
But still 17.9% or even 20% is NOT enough
sheshe2
(83,785 posts)GOTV 2014...
We rocked the vote before...lets increase our numbers. We were half, lets make it three quarters!
Lets do it!
Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)brooklynite
(94,587 posts)HHS Secretary Sebelius: former Governor of Kansas
DHS Secretary Napolitano: former Governor of Arizona
Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)This is 2013. We should have LOTS more female governors and LOTS more female U.S. Senators.
Even IF those two that you mentioned were still governors then it still would be NO where near enough.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)You seem to support Republicans being elected if they are women? Very much against that. Very much.
Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)For example: there have been many times in the U.S. Senate in the past where Republicans Collins, Snowe, and Murkowski crossed the aisle and voted with the Democrats on an issue regarding women.
Of course if I had my way 99% of all elected offices would be held by Democrats
Would have to keep a couple republicans around to remind us of how bad they are.
niyad
(113,325 posts)hfojvt
(37,573 posts)Kansas has term limits, unlike some other states which seemingly have lifetime Governors, just three that I have lived in, for example South Dakota - Bill Janklow four terms, Wisconsin - Tommy Thompson four terms, Iowa - Terry Branstad four terms. Heck the only way Wisconsin got rid of Thompson was that Bush tapped him to be Secretary of HHS.
I do blame President Obama for one thing though, because I thought Sebelius had a good shot at being elected US Senator in 2010, and really her absence - the absence of a strong candidate has been devastating to the whole state party which lost a ton of seats in the state legislature in 2010. But maybe that reaction to 2008 was bound to happen in Kansas anyway.
TDale313
(7,820 posts)In California. We've had two female Senators forever. Perhaps Kamela Harris? (When Gov Jerry Brown's done, of course)
Xithras
(16,191 posts)She may be the state's Attorney General, but that doesn't quite make up for the fact that she has absolutely no local, county, state, or federal lawmaking experience. She's never so much as sat on a city council or local school board seat.
There's a big difference between enforcing the law, and actually being responsible for making it. If she were to run for governor, she would be blasted nonstop over the fact that she has no real experience, either in the public or private sectors. I've heard her name come up among Democrats as a potential post-Brown contender too, and I've always heard her limited experience brought up as a major pitfall.
Lots of people on the left also have reservations about putting a "law and order" criminal prosecutor in charge of the state, with all of the potential implications that go along with that. I know that Harris tends to be a bit of a reformer when it comes to crime, but in a state where a disparate percentage of minorities end up in prison because of our punitive legal structure, it might prove difficult to convince those same minorities to support a gubernatorial candidate who spent the past decade trying to lock even more people away.
She's great in her current job, but I don't see her becoming governor anytime soon.
putitinD
(1,551 posts)davidn3600
(6,342 posts)The problem is not that people are not voting for women...the problem is the lack of women willing to run for office.
http://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2012/01/why-women-dont-run-office-much-men-do
Dustin DeWinde
(193 posts)Does that mean that new Hampshire is in need of fixing since their entire congressional delegation is female?
Or better yet should we scream bloody murder because out of 50 governors only one is Black?
I don't think so. Pick your battles wisely. I am black and an extremely strident advocate for my peeps, but as an American I truly believe the voters are never to blame. If the better candidate loses its because he or she didn't communicate well enough.
Oh and kudos to nh for their pricing the best folks available. Ditto to MA for deval Patrick.
And if folks can convince Liz Warren to run for president she will get my vote..
Dustin DeWinde
(193 posts)Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)You can click on that link and fix your post and then save the edit.
Thought I'd toss that out there in case you didn't know.
And welcome to DU
Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)... regarding abortion/reproductive rights.
I will not apologize for wanting more WOMEN in Congress to represent OUR interests.
And also in the state legislatures.
davidn3600
(6,342 posts)...you might first want to get your own side united.
You act like abortion is a male vs. female fight. I can't tell you how many times I see anti-abortion bumper stickers and a woman driving the car. There is a strong percentage of women that are pro-life.
Dustin DeWinde
(193 posts)Don't really know of any liberals, or any decent people of any political persuasion who disagree with a womana right to choose whether or not to carry a pregnancy to term.
Fair is fair, their bodies their choice. Besides its not like there aren't more pressing political matters at hand leave the women their prerogatives.
Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)See Comment #23
I'm not saying that there aren't any men (I can't think of any at the moment) - what I'm saying is that women normally fight with a passion for women rights.
Therefore the more WOMEN we have in the U.S. Congress, in Governorships, and at all levels of state and local government the better
hfojvt
(37,573 posts)as long as those Republicans are women?
Too bad we lost Governor Sarah Palin then and we are gonna lose Michelle Bachmann in the House.
Mars NEEDS those women dammit.
Dustin DeWinde
(193 posts)This is a discussion thread and I put in my two cents. No one is asking you to apologize for anything. Pick your battles wisely. Or don't , its a free country.
awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)Triana
(22,666 posts)theHandpuppet
(19,964 posts)My partner and I are strong supporters of Emily's list.
sheshe2
(83,785 posts)Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)Below are just a few names from the past year or two of Women Fighting for Women
I'm sitting here trying to think of a few names of MEN that are fighting for women and women's rights and none are coming to mind.
On the issue of Women's Rights in my opinion the best advocates 'for women' are 'women'
Texas State Senator Wendy Davis
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wendy_Davis_%28politician%29
California State Representative Jackie Spear
Kentucky State Senator Kathy Stein
U.S. Senator Kirsten Gillibrand
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kristen_Gillibrand
Military Sexual Assaults and Rapes
U.S. Representative Tammy Duckworth
Sandra Fluke
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandra_Fluke
Cecile Richards
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cecile_Richards
Sarah Slamen
Lilly Ledbetter
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lilly_Ledbetter
Hillary Clinton
When Clinton left the State Department, it marked the first time she was a fully private citizen in thirty years. While she left without any firm plans for the future other than rest, she soon began work on another volume of memoirs (scheduled for publication in mid-2014) and she and her daughter joined her husband as named members of the Clinton Foundation, where she planned to work on issues regarding women and small children.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_clinton
sheshe2
(83,785 posts)However let's not forget President Obama and VP Joe Biden!
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)advocates save for rich women.
tabbycat31
(6,336 posts)She's a fiercely progressive state senator who's taking on Chris Christie this year.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)Scurrilous
(38,687 posts)Freddie
(9,267 posts)Rep. Allyson Schwartz
Of course that would mean one less woman in Congress but we need her in the Governors Mansion to start undoing the destruction Corbett has done.
BumRushDaShow
(129,062 posts)Marjorie Margolies-Mezvinsky has expressed interest in running for what was HER old seat (that same 13th Congressional district that Allyson would vacate). That district is now almost solid blue.
Win-win.
Freddie
(9,267 posts)My ex-Congressperson (we moved to Bucks Co.) and Chelsea's mother-in-law! Wish I could vote for her again.
BumRushDaShow
(129,062 posts)I am in the 2nd and one sis is in the 13th. Another sis is in the wacky 7th. Just sad.
B Calm
(28,762 posts)democrats, but what a difference! Sarah Palin or Jennifer Granholm
badtoworse
(5,957 posts)In the end, it's up to the voters. If they want male governors, who's to say they can't have them?
Did you think about this before you posted?
niyad
(113,325 posts)a level playing field here in the patriarchy.
badtoworse
(5,957 posts)How would you level the playing field without jeopardizing the chances of winning?
niyad
(113,325 posts)badtoworse
(5,957 posts)I don't see that changing
niyad
(113,325 posts)Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)... advantage as men.
With each passing decade...
1) more women graduate college
2) more women are becoming attorneys
3) more women are obtaining political science degrees and are entering the political realm
4) more women are waking up to the fact that republican men are a danger to our rights and we women are the best people to protect those rights
I can imagine that even possibly at the beginning of the next decade that the number of women might equal the number of men in the U.S. Congress.
Little Star
(17,055 posts)What the heck is wrong with us with only one woman in a Democratic state? Weird huh?
Just struck me funny.
avebury
(10,952 posts)lonestarnot
(77,097 posts)JustAnotherGen
(31,828 posts)Chris Christie in NJ - but the party leadership and money peole are completely ignoring the campaign.
She's running as a liberal Democratic candidate - with a history in the state legislature of firmly liberal and progressive votes. But eh? NJ isn't sexy. And she's not nearly as 'sexy' as Booker . . . who is getting all the money for his Senate race.
tabbycat31
(6,336 posts)And her running mate is also female.
One_Life_To_Give
(6,036 posts)I dislike calling it "sexism" which is the common term. When it's a collection of gender norms and behaviors that influence why we see Leaders as Masculine. Authority figures have deeper voices, stand taller than the rest and have a statuesque chiseled presence.
While we expect others to be gentler and put other people ahead of them which doesn't really blend with the Ego that is common with politicians. Nor the thick hide that is necessary to survive all the mud slinging that comes about.
If all we try and do is increase the numbers of "female's" in office then many will be Maggie Thatcher types. And I don't think that should be the goal. Rather we need to address what being a "leader " should be and eliminate the dogma of male/female gender norms.
Blue_In_AK
(46,436 posts)joeybee12
(56,177 posts)people on the planet.
Jamaal510
(10,893 posts)but more female leaders who actually have the best interests of women in mind. Having more Bachmanns and more Haleys elected to power are a big no-no.