Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAppeals court upholds ruling striking down NYC's large soda ban
NEW YORK, July 30 (Reuters) - New York City's plan to ban large sugary drinks from restaurants and other eateries was an illegal overreach of executive power, a state appeals court ruled on Tuesday, upholding a lower court decision in March that struck down the law.
The law, which would have prohibited those businesses from selling sodas and other sugary beverages larger than 16 ounces, "violated the state principle of separation of powers," the First Department of the state Supreme Court's Appellate Division said in a unanimous decision.
Mayor Michael Bloomberg had advanced the regulation as a way to combat obesity among city residents. Beverage makers and business groups, however, challenged it in court, calling it an attack on consumers' personal freedom.
http://www.trust.org/item/20130730150939-phkih
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
8 replies, 740 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
8 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Appeals court upholds ruling striking down NYC's large soda ban (Original Post)
The Straight Story
Jul 2013
OP
tumtum
(438 posts)1. This is a proper ruling.
Obviously an overreach on M. Bloomberg's part.
pipoman
(16,038 posts)2. Bloomberg..just a 1%er who wants what all 1%ers want..
WORLD DOMINATION!
The Straight Story
(48,121 posts)3. And sadly, some would love to help him achieve that
one ban / choice removal at a time.
tumtum
(438 posts)4. Isn't this the same guy who bragged about having the world's 4th largest army?
Isn't this the same guy who embraces the NYPD's racist, unconstitutional stop and frisk policy?
Isn't this the same guy who turn his 4th largest army (NYPD) on the Occupy Wall street protesters last year with brutal results?
If so, them why would any Democrat support this guy?
meow2u3
(24,764 posts)5. Bloomberg usurped the power of City Council to make the law
Executive overreach is right. It's the job of the legislative branch to make law; not the executive branch. Bloomberg has no right to rule by decree, so the court is right in striking down the soda ban.
pintobean
(18,101 posts)6. I miss g4a right now.
Baclava
(12,047 posts)7. How much money did this cost the city and the state?
Isn't there anything in NYC that's more important to do than this, like pulling a cat out of a tree or something?
hack89
(39,171 posts)8. Good. nt