Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

The Straight Story

(48,121 posts)
Tue Jul 30, 2013, 02:19 PM Jul 2013

Court Rejects Religious Rights for Companies

Court Rejects Religious Rights for Companies

(CN) - A Mennonite-owned cabinet business is not exempt from health care reform's mandate to cover contraceptives, a divided 3rd Circuit ruled, because for-profit companies "cannot engage in religious exercise."

Tackling the contentious issue of whether corporations are entitled to First Amendment rights, the federal appeals court in Philadelphia refused to issue a preliminary injunction to Conestoga Wood Specialties Corp.

Conestoga sought an order that would block the government from enforcing the Women's Preventive Healthcare regulations of the Affordable Care Act of 2010, which requires employers to pay for contraception services for employees, among other things.

The carpentry business in central Pennsylvania is owned by the Hahn family and employs about 950 people. The Hahns' Mennonite faith teaches them that terminating a fertilized embryo "is intrinsic evil and a sin against God," according to their lawsuit against the Obama administration.

http://www.courthousenews.com/2013/07/29/59746.htm

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Court Rejects Religious Rights for Companies (Original Post) The Straight Story Jul 2013 OP
a little a'skeered of science, aren't they? Myrina Jul 2013 #1
This is fairly simple. longship Jul 2013 #2
You thinking what I'm thinking? jmowreader Jul 2013 #3
Good. surrealAmerican Jul 2013 #4
I'm glad. Vashta Nerada Jul 2013 #5
I love the smell of napalmed Idiot-ology in the morning! riqster Jul 2013 #6
Poor widdle corpeoples... AmBlue Jul 2013 #7

Myrina

(12,296 posts)
1. a little a'skeered of science, aren't they?
Tue Jul 30, 2013, 02:25 PM
Jul 2013

The Pill is not an aborificent. It PREVENTS fertilization in the first place.
D'oh!!

longship

(40,416 posts)
2. This is fairly simple.
Tue Jul 30, 2013, 02:32 PM
Jul 2013

If a company cannot discriminate on religion in hiring, then they cannot discriminate on access to healthcare for their employees based on religion.

This is the only sensible conclusion.

If the religious don't want to use contraception that's their choice. But they cannot impose that on their employees simply because they don't like it. They just don't get to do that.

A good decision. I am gobsmacked that it wasn't unanimous.

jmowreader

(50,559 posts)
3. You thinking what I'm thinking?
Tue Jul 30, 2013, 02:34 PM
Jul 2013

Does this apply to Hobby Lobby and Chick-fil-A? And how fast will they join in amicus on an appeal?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Court Rejects Religious R...