Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
Thu Aug 1, 2013, 05:32 PM Aug 2013

Michele Catalano: If you don't believe my story, kiss my ass

Wow...she sounds like a fantastic journalist who's ready to win the Pulitzer prize.

Ya, right.


You don't believe my story? Ask any of my followers about my credibility. Then kiss my ass. Thanks.

https://twitter.com/inthefade


Check out the rest of her tweets. I don't think she's altogether there
55 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Michele Catalano: If you don't believe my story, kiss my ass (Original Post) Cali_Democrat Aug 2013 OP
wow. you didn't lose any time demonizing her, did you? cali Aug 2013 #1
Linking to her own tweet and using her own words is demonizing her? Cali_Democrat Aug 2013 #3
I think it's a great tweet, shows a woman with spirit. So no, it doesn't diminish her at all. I have sabrina 1 Aug 2013 #13
NP. n/t Cali_Democrat Aug 2013 #17
Agreed, we are emotional creatures, though some would have us sterile corporate automatons usGovOwesUs3Trillion Aug 2013 #42
So are you still going to follow her on twitter? Cali_Democrat Aug 2013 #49
Maybe you should have. Of course I will follow her, why would you think otherwise? I follow sabrina 1 Aug 2013 #50
Don't you love that? Linking to people's actual words when they don't fit the current msanthrope Aug 2013 #23
The OP: ''Check out the rest of her tweets. I don't think she's altogether there'' Octafish Aug 2013 #24
The OP doesn't have to be objective--but the 'journalist' should be. nt msanthrope Aug 2013 #28
This message was self-deleted by its author Cali_Democrat Aug 2013 #29
Let's play parse the post! And let's destroy disinguous nonsense too! cali Aug 2013 #25
Yup. What I wrote was a vile, vicious example of wicked character assassination and smearing. n/t Cali_Democrat Aug 2013 #30
Hey cali....so the story turned out to be complete bullshit. Cali_Democrat Aug 2013 #45
Saying "I don't think she's altogether there" is demonizing her muriel_volestrangler Aug 2013 #32
I'm in agreement with you Cali_Democrat Aug 2013 #33
Though you won't see it, your tactics are those of the Soviet Union muriel_volestrangler Aug 2013 #34
Yes... my tactics are indeed those of the Soviet Union Cali_Democrat Aug 2013 #35
So you were correct Just Saying Aug 2013 #44
Yup Cali_Democrat Aug 2013 #47
Well, as long as you know what you did wrong... tallahasseedem Aug 2013 #48
Well, the Commissar was right, this woman is a flake and her story was crap. geek tragedy Aug 2013 #37
Dear God... Number23 Aug 2013 #43
I believe her. But then I have been called a liar for telling about the rabid cat I diagnosed kestrel91316 Aug 2013 #2
Hopefully she will at least give an interview. She is a journalist after all Cali_Democrat Aug 2013 #4
her husband should do the interview nt geek tragedy Aug 2013 #5
Perhaps she could be forced to talk by waterboarding her. How dare she want to kestrel91316 Aug 2013 #8
That's absurd. She shouldn't be forced to talk Cali_Democrat Aug 2013 #9
I don't know who she is. Just Saying Aug 2013 #6
She's not a journalist, she's a freelance writer who sufrommich Aug 2013 #7
I was wondering if her writing may have had something Just Saying Aug 2013 #26
Former Pajamas Media writer...freelancer. nt msanthrope Aug 2013 #12
Pajamas media? Cali_Democrat Aug 2013 #15
Batshit conservative news outlet. But she's quoted breathlessly here by the Hair on Fire crowd.. msanthrope Aug 2013 #18
Huh Just Saying Aug 2013 #27
And she wrote for Boing Boing, a great site, and Forbes has published her work. sabrina 1 Aug 2013 #19
Forbes? Editor is Steve Forbes, right? Cali_Democrat Aug 2013 #20
Take a look at her posting history in post #21-- nt msanthrope Aug 2013 #22
One blog post written today on Boing Boing. msanthrope Aug 2013 #21
I totally understand her point of view. Baitball Blogger Aug 2013 #10
She said they said they do this to 100 people a day and no one spoke up until now? Beaverhausen Aug 2013 #11
She wrote for Pajamas Media....'nuff said. nt msanthrope Aug 2013 #14
OMGawd, I went to that link. My head hurts. The stupid, it burns! freshwest Aug 2013 #54
Her story sounds like bullshit leftstreet Aug 2013 #16
You called it. geek tragedy Aug 2013 #40
Ah jeez leftstreet Aug 2013 #41
She sounds like she's from NY Sanity Claws Aug 2013 #31
Hey Michelle, can I kiss your ass since your story was bullshit, you hack! geek tragedy Aug 2013 #36
I assume she said something that made Obama/the NSA look bad? /nt Marr Aug 2013 #38
she fabricated a story about the federal government harassing her because geek tragedy Aug 2013 #39
Hahahahaha ProSense Aug 2013 #46
SNAP!!! n/t freshwest Aug 2013 #55
Charmer. CakeGrrl Aug 2013 #51
I don't know how much, if any of this is true but.............. wandy Aug 2013 #52
Kick Scurrilous Aug 2013 #53
 

cali

(114,904 posts)
1. wow. you didn't lose any time demonizing her, did you?
Thu Aug 1, 2013, 05:41 PM
Aug 2013

It's clearly important to you to discredit her thus discrediting her story which touches on the Obama administration through the measures taken by the National Security agencies.

I'll freely confess I don't understand your perspective, which appears to be that defending the administration no matter what is of paramount importance. I get feeling that the President is unfairly attacked here, but why let that obfuscate important issues?

I think I know pretty much what you'll say in response to my post.

Oh, btw, I just read through her twitter posts and no, no it doesn't look at all as if she's nuts or off or whatever it is you're saying about her. Yes, she posted a pissed off and rather intemperate post. Are you aware that that's hardly a shocking thing even for reporters?

 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
3. Linking to her own tweet and using her own words is demonizing her?
Thu Aug 1, 2013, 05:44 PM
Aug 2013

OK. Got it.

I won't use her own words again.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
13. I think it's a great tweet, shows a woman with spirit. So no, it doesn't diminish her at all. I have
Thu Aug 1, 2013, 06:10 PM
Aug 2013

put her on my 'follow list'. Thanks for the link.

 

usGovOwesUs3Trillion

(2,022 posts)
42. Agreed, we are emotional creatures, though some would have us sterile corporate automatons
Thu Aug 1, 2013, 08:22 PM
Aug 2013

Without emotion.

 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
49. So are you still going to follow her on twitter?
Fri Aug 2, 2013, 03:57 PM
Aug 2013

After all, she's a woman with spirit!

Sorry, I couldn't resist.



sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
50. Maybe you should have. Of course I will follow her, why would you think otherwise? I follow
Fri Aug 2, 2013, 04:38 PM
Aug 2013

members of the Corporate Media and I've yet to see any of them do what she just did. Apologize for all the lies and distortions the have told and are still telling.

And you reminded me of something I might have forgotten. Speaking of being so completely wrong about something or someone.

You reminded me of some people here who owe an apology for attacking good DUers, while supporting a return troll, and disappearing without apologizing or admitting how wrong they were.

Maybe if YOU, who 'can't resist' were to remind them of their manners, the DUers who were attacked on behalf of an obvious troll might get the apology this woman gave for being wrong??

Something tells me you might not be interested, but I could be wrong. But just in case, because I could be wrong:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023348347

He needed more than coffee!! And so many supporters!



 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
23. Don't you love that? Linking to people's actual words when they don't fit the current
Thu Aug 1, 2013, 06:33 PM
Aug 2013

narrative is SMEARING them!!!

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
24. The OP: ''Check out the rest of her tweets. I don't think she's altogether there''
Thu Aug 1, 2013, 06:37 PM
Aug 2013

Or maybe it was this part:

"Wow...she sounds like a fantastic journalist who's ready to win the Pulitzer prize.

Ya, right."

Either way, it doesn't sound like an objective report.

Response to Octafish (Reply #24)

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
25. Let's play parse the post! And let's destroy disinguous nonsense too!
Thu Aug 1, 2013, 06:41 PM
Aug 2013

Here's your op:

Wow...she sounds like a fantastic journalist who's ready to win the Pulitzer prize.

Ya, right.


You don't believe my story? Ask any of my followers about my credibility. Then kiss my ass. Thanks.

https://twitter.com/inthefade


Check out the rest of her tweets. I don't think she's altogether there

Okeydokey, line 1: A sarcastic dig at her (which line 2 is part of)

Followed by the post you find so shockingly reveals her lack of credibility as a journalist.

Line 3: And this one is the kicker: I don't think she's altogether there. Yes, of course you're attempting to demonize and discredit her and it does YOU no fucking credit at all to play coy and deny what's obvious and in your own words.

 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
30. Yup. What I wrote was a vile, vicious example of wicked character assassination and smearing. n/t
Thu Aug 1, 2013, 06:58 PM
Aug 2013
 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
45. Hey cali....so the story turned out to be complete bullshit.
Thu Aug 1, 2013, 09:58 PM
Aug 2013

But remember, questioning a person's credibility in any way is akin to demonization and character assassination, right?

Never question a person's integrity, right?

Oh god.....this is just too funny.

muriel_volestrangler

(101,306 posts)
32. Saying "I don't think she's altogether there" is demonizing her
Thu Aug 1, 2013, 07:41 PM
Aug 2013

Because you seem to need the bleeding obvious pointed out to you, repeatedly.

 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
33. I'm in agreement with you
Thu Aug 1, 2013, 07:44 PM
Aug 2013

I should have never said that I don't think she's altogether there.

What I wrote was a vicious and vile demonization. It was a wicked and outrageous example of horrific character assassination of the highest order.

I sincerely apologize.

muriel_volestrangler

(101,306 posts)
34. Though you won't see it, your tactics are those of the Soviet Union
Thu Aug 1, 2013, 07:51 PM
Aug 2013

Trying to call someone crazy, in the hope that people won't listen to them. You may be only one person, but that means you have sole responsibility for your decision to go down that road.

Your 'sincerity' shine like a firefly that's be shat upon by an incontinent cow.

 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
35. Yes... my tactics are indeed those of the Soviet Union
Thu Aug 1, 2013, 07:56 PM
Aug 2013

They are tactics the Stasi engaged in. What I wrote was akin to fascism. I am utterly ashamed of my self for engaging in horrific demonization and Stasi-like tactics of the former Soviet Union.

What I did was fascist, Stasi-like and very authoritarian. The propaganda flowing forth from my post is absolutely sickening.

Never again will I say someone isn't altogether there.

Just Saying

(1,799 posts)
44. So you were correct
Thu Aug 1, 2013, 09:54 PM
Aug 2013

As well as being completely entitled to your opinion.

I'm sure they'll be back to admit they overreacted any minute now...

Yep...


 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
47. Yup
Fri Aug 2, 2013, 12:42 PM
Aug 2013

It's as if we can't express certain opinions about somebody based on what they say because THAT would be character assassination and demonization.

It's very strange to say the least.

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
2. I believe her. But then I have been called a liar for telling about the rabid cat I diagnosed
Thu Aug 1, 2013, 05:43 PM
Aug 2013

25 years ago, so I have some experience with the hater contingent.

Haters gonna hate.

 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
4. Hopefully she will at least give an interview. She is a journalist after all
Thu Aug 1, 2013, 05:57 PM
Aug 2013

She still says she won't do any interviews about this. People have questions they would like answered and I don't see why she can't answer them.

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
8. Perhaps she could be forced to talk by waterboarding her. How dare she want to
Thu Aug 1, 2013, 06:05 PM
Aug 2013

say her piece and then move on!!

 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
9. That's absurd. She shouldn't be forced to talk
Thu Aug 1, 2013, 06:07 PM
Aug 2013

But clearly she's angry about people questioning her story. Perhaps giving an interview which answers some people's questions isn't such a bad idea.

Just Saying

(1,799 posts)
6. I don't know who she is.
Thu Aug 1, 2013, 05:58 PM
Aug 2013

Is she really a journalist or a blogger? And yes, I'm aware that some blogs are written by journalists and are informative. But some are just blogs.

I believe some sort of law enforcement came to her door, but I'd like more information about what happened.

Just Saying

(1,799 posts)
26. I was wondering if her writing may have had something
Thu Aug 1, 2013, 06:44 PM
Aug 2013

To do with why she was targeted. But just about music? Probably not.

Just Saying

(1,799 posts)
27. Huh
Thu Aug 1, 2013, 06:45 PM
Aug 2013

Probably why I've never heard of her.

Back to wondering if she was targeted for reasons other than backpacks and pressure cookers...

 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
20. Forbes? Editor is Steve Forbes, right?
Thu Aug 1, 2013, 06:17 PM
Aug 2013
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Forbes

Malcolm Stevenson "Steve" Forbes, Jr. (born July 18, 1947) is an American publishing executive who was twice a candidate for the nomination of the Republican Party for president. He is the editor-in-chief of business magazine Forbes magazine as well as president and chief executive officer of its publisher, Forbes, Inc. He was a Republican candidate in the 1996 presidential primaries[1] and 2000. He is the son of longtime Forbes publisher Malcolm Forbes and the grandson of that publication's founder, B.C. Forbes.

<...>

Political endorsements

On January 7, 2010, Forbes announced his endorsement of Rand Paul, Republican candidate for the U.S. Senate in the Commonwealth of Kentucky.[20]

On January 28, 2010, he formally endorsed Marco Rubio, Republican candidate for the U.S. Senate in the State of Florida.[21]

He endorsed incumbent U.S. Senator John McCain, Republican of the State of Arizona for re-election in 2010.[22]

On July 28, 2010, he formally endorsed Peter Schiff, Republican candidate for the U.S. Senate in the State of Connecticut.[23]

On August 13, 2010, he announced his endorsement of Jim Huffman, Republican candidate for the U.S. Senate in the State of Oregon.[24]

On August 26, 2010, Forbes formally endorsed Mariannette Miller-Meeks, Republican candidate for the U.S. House of Representatives in the 2nd Congressional District of Iowa.[25]

On September 2, 2010, Forbes formally endorsed State Representative Justin Amash, Republican candidate for the U.S. House of Representatives in Michigan's 3rd congressional district.[26]

On October 12, 2010, Forbes formally endorsed Bill Hudak, Republican candidate for the U.S. House of Representatives in Massachusetts's 6th congressional district.[27]

In 2011, Forbes endorsed Texas Governor Rick Perry for President in 2012.[28]


Baitball Blogger

(46,699 posts)
10. I totally understand her point of view.
Thu Aug 1, 2013, 06:08 PM
Aug 2013

It's a frustrating experience for many whistleblowers or journalists who truly have something new to add to the discussion. Demonizing them, or us, is very disheartening. Instead of responding with depression, it's best to respond with a hearty FUCK YOU!

Damn. I could write a list of the crazy things I've had to tolerate. The latest involved taking one of my husband's cousin's grandchild out to breakfast. We arrived in two different cars because he was going on with his journey afterwards. We just walked in and before we had a chance to sit down the kid was grilled by two couples who had been watching us from a table next to a window. They wanted to know where he was from. We handled it good naturedly, and sat down to eat breakfast. Throughout the entire meal the man who had the best vantage point kept looking at us with a judgmental look on his face. He had his hand on his hip and he shook his head in disgust.

What the hell?!!

I've reached the conclusion that no one can possibly understand that these kind of responses from the peanut gallery makes us stronger in our resolve because we have nothing to keep us strong but our convictions.

Beaverhausen

(24,470 posts)
11. She said they said they do this to 100 people a day and no one spoke up until now?
Thu Aug 1, 2013, 06:09 PM
Aug 2013

riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight!!!

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
54. OMGawd, I went to that link. My head hurts. The stupid, it burns!
Wed Aug 7, 2013, 09:22 PM
Aug 2013
Further Humiliation was the best section there. And Joe the Plumber was one of theirs, too.

leftstreet

(36,106 posts)
16. Her story sounds like bullshit
Thu Aug 1, 2013, 06:12 PM
Aug 2013

She claims it took weeks after the alleged Google searches for LE to come bounding in. She herself admits she doesn't know why they came, she's just speculating it was the searches.

That LE was at her home - probably true
That LE acted on a tip rather than Google searches - possibly
That her husband may have lied to her - possibly
That her son may have lied to her - possibly

That she's trying to get out in front of something by creating a media stir - oh hells yeah!

leftstreet

(36,106 posts)
41. Ah jeez
Thu Aug 1, 2013, 08:12 PM
Aug 2013

Sounds like a employer / ex-employee conflict

But boy did she milk the drama!
Thanks for finding this

Sanity Claws

(21,846 posts)
31. She sounds like she's from NY
Thu Aug 1, 2013, 07:35 PM
Aug 2013

In NY, saying you can kiss her ass is the refined way of telling someone to fuck off.

I don't think that wording hurts her credibility. I don't know the full story and will determine her credibility by other things.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
39. she fabricated a story about the federal government harassing her because
Thu Aug 1, 2013, 08:09 PM
Aug 2013

it intercepted her google searches, and blamed it on Obama.

Turns out, she's a truthiness-challenged flake.

http://techcrunch.com/2013/08/01/employer-tipped-off-police-in-pressure-cookerbackpack-gate-not-google/

wandy

(3,539 posts)
52. I don't know how much, if any of this is true but..............
Fri Aug 2, 2013, 05:25 PM
Aug 2013

You might want to check out this OP..
Some background on the latest hero, blogger Michele Catalano,
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023391018

I can tell you that she has become the darling of a few right wing forums.
Over to "oldcogerconservitivs" she's got em all over there yelling "expletive" Thanks Obama".

One thing to note. Michele Catalano can get the RW Wackos all stirred up without offending the M.I.C, one of GOP co. major stake holders.
If Karl Rove did that he would be ticking off one of the bosses.

One other thing. Using the "work" computer for personal business always has the potential to end badley.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Michele Catalano: If you ...