A False Equivalence Classic
>snip<
The 44th president, like his 43 predecessors, believes that the United States should honor its sovereign debt, as part of maintaining the full faith and credit of the United States. He also believes that the policy on government spending first applied under George Washington and in force since then should still be the policy now: once Congress has voted programs or benefits into law, then the government is legally and morally obligated to carry out those programs, until and unless they are repealed.*
To which the other side to the dispute replies: Who cares! We dont like you or your programs, and to prove it were willing to risk a default on the national debt. Whats going on now is more like the 1970s-era hijackers Brendan Koerner describes in his recent book, who would threaten to blow up the plane unless they got the ride to Cuba they wanted. Or, if you want a less violent analogy, its like me walking into a restaurant, ordering and enjoying a meal, and then when I finished just tearing up the check and saying that I was digging in my heels about whether I should pay.
More here:http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2013/07/a-false-equivalence-classic/278225/