General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHamburger chef Jamie Oliver has just won a battle against one of the largest fast food chains
Thank You to Bella Capozzi
Hamburger chef Jamie Oliver has just won a battle against one of the largest fast food chains in the world. After Oliver showed how McDonalds hamburgers are made, the franchise announced it will change its recipe.
According to Oliver, the fatty parts of beef are washed in ammonium hydroxide and used in the filling of the burger. Before this process, according to the presenter, the food is deemed unfit for human consumption.
According to the chef and presenter, Jamie Oliver, who has undertaken a war against the fast food industry: Basically, were taking a product that would be sold in the cheapest way for dogs, and after this process, is being given to human beings.
Besides the low quality of the meat, the ammonium hydroxide is harmful to health. Oliver calls it the pink slime process.
Why would any sensible human being put meat filled with ammonia in the mouths of their children? asked the chef, who wages a war against the fast food industry.
In one of his initiatives, Oliver demonstrates to children how nuggets are made. After selecting the best parts of the chicken, the remains (fat, skin and internal organs) are processed for these fried foods.
The company, Arcos Dorados, the franchise manager in Latin America, said such a procedure is not practiced in the region. The same applies to the product in Ireland and the UK, where they use meat from local suppliers.
In the United States, Burger King and Taco Bell had already abandoned the use of ammonia in their products. The food industry uses ammonium hydroxide as an anti-microbial agent in meats, which has allowed McDonalds to use otherwise inedible meat.
Even more disturbing is that because ammonium hydroxide is considered part of the component in a production procedure by the USDA, consumers may not know when the chemical is in their food.
On the official website of McDonalds, the company claims that their meat is cheap because, while serving many people every day, they are able to buy from their suppliers at a lower price, and offer the best quality products.
In addition, the franchise denied that the decision to change the recipe is related to Jamie Olivers campaign. On the site, McDonalds has admitted that they have abandoned the beef filler from its burger patties.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2092127/Jamie-Oliver-Victory-McDonalds-stops-using-pink-slime-burger-recipe.html
Brickbat
(19,339 posts)Or, at least, a rehash of an old Daily Mail article:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2092127/Jamie-Oliver-Victory-McDonalds-stops-using-pink-slime-burger-recipe.html
Katashi_itto
(10,175 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)Brickbat
(19,339 posts)demwing
(16,916 posts)To poisoned pink slime passing as food?
Major Nikon
(36,818 posts)The end result is simply more unsustainable beef cows going to the slaughter. The ammonia gas used in the process is done for antimicrobial reasons. It's no more poison than the chlorine in tap water, actually less so when you consider that the ammonia used doesn't stay in the end product, unlike the chlorine in water which remains dissolved for hours after it comes out of the tap.
demwing
(16,916 posts)to poisonous pink slime posing as food."
RebelOne
(30,947 posts)but I think it should wake people up enough to not eat that junk food from fast food restaurants. I am a vegetarian, but in my pre-vegetarian days, I would not buy anything from McDonald's or Burger King. I preferred to cook my hamburgers at home because at least I knew what I was eating.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)You have your choice without people here trying to change your food choices. Some of us are not vegetarians by choice and putting propaganda pieces up will not encourage me to change. Makes some feel good I guess.
Rex
(65,616 posts)Garbage as well?
TeamPooka
(24,210 posts)dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)Facebook links do not work for most people.
You need to use primary sources, not what other people have posted on their FB accounts.
tkmorris
(11,138 posts)I tend to agree that the post is problematic.
1) It's an old story. Over a year and a half actually.
2) It's a very biased look at what happened. I don't think Jamie Oliver had anything to do with any changes in McDonald's recipes. He seems to be a flibbertigibbet who makes noise then takes credit for things that have nothing to do with him.
3) You provided a better link, so that's good, but it does confirm that this "story" is quite dated.
4) The science is bad. I'm not terribly fond of over processed foods of any kind but this article is written to make it sound like a horribly disgusting and unsafe practice, much like the orange juice stories of recent memory, when in fact it's all fairly standard. If you're going to complain about food production using such methods you need to apply such criticisms fairly. There are similar foods all through your local supermarket; fast food chains are not particularly egregious in their practices. Furthermore changing these sorts of food production techniques may be a good idea but it WILL raise costs dramatically across the board, resulting in less affordable food and in many cases complete non-availibility of certain items.
I am all in favor of having a discussion about reforming some of our worst food production issues, but it seems impossible to have a balanced discussion that starts with such a horribly one-sided article.
AZ Progressive
(3,411 posts)That's pretty stupid IMO.
This just goes to show that they don't care if they slowly poison you, as long as they make more profit.
Major Nikon
(36,818 posts)I don't think even Oliver went that far.
kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)not salvaged trimmings without a speck of muscle in them.
It's ok to feed this to dogs. If it were properly labeled and not snuck into fast food to feed to unsuspecting consumers I would be ok with it for human consumption, but you'd have to practically give it away.
Major Nikon
(36,818 posts)It's not as if we are talking about health food.
A big mac, fries, and a coke has somewhere around 1200-1500 calories depending on how big you want to supersize and a large portion of that comes from fat and simple carbs. People should be a lot more concerned about that.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,271 posts)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jamie_Oliver
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)Make7
(8,543 posts)Historic NY
(37,449 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)By M. Alex Johnson, Staff Writer, NBC News
McDonald's confirmed that it has eliminated the use of ammonium hydroxide an ingredient in fertilizers, household cleaners and some roll-your-own explosives in its hamburger meat.
The company denied that its decision was influenced by a months-long campaign by celebrity chef Jamie Oliver to get ammonium-hydroxide-treated meats like chicken and beef out of the U.S. food supply. But it acknowledged this week that it had stopped using the unappetizing pink goo made from treating otherwise inedible scrap meat with the chemical several months ago.
Besides being used as a household cleaner and in fertilizers, the compound releases flammable vapors, and with the addition of certain acids, it can be turned into ammonium nitrate, a common component in homemade bombs. It's also widely used in the food industry as an anti-microbial agent in meats and as a leavener in bread and cake products. It's regulated by the U.S. Agriculture Department, which classifies it as "generally recognized as safe."
Looks like you are right, don't mind the people in here that hate the daily mail. Let us see if the hate nbc news too.
Katashi_itto
(10,175 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)This is GD, NOT LBN...thanks for bring it back up.
Major Nikon
(36,818 posts)Food grade ammonium hydroxide is FDA approved and has been used throughout the food industry and has been for decades.
Just sayin'
Rex
(65,616 posts)Just curious'
Major Nikon
(36,818 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)Major Nikon
(36,818 posts)If you want other links, you can go here and research the WHO's standards on ammonium hydroxide for a variety of food products.
http://www.codexalimentarius.net/gsfaonline/additives/details.html?id=380
Or you can read what federal regulations has to say about it.
http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/CFRSearch.cfm?fr=184.1139
Gin
(7,212 posts)No more mc donalds for me.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)and the story was from early 2012
marions ghost
(19,841 posts)He has done amazing work in the area of nutrition and less adulterated food, especially for children.
I think he has changed the conversation.
Jamie
corkhead
(6,119 posts)Don't expect any action from our government on this
Because I doubt that a Big Mac a part of this guy's diet.