General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsObama's abuse of the Espionage Act is modern-day McCarthyism
Shame on this president for persecuting whistleblowers with a legal relic, while administration officials leak with impunity
The conviction of Bradley Manning under the 1917 Espionage Act, and the US Justice Department's decision to file espionage charges against NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden under the same act, are yet further examples of the Obama administration's policy of using an iron fist against human rights and civil liberties activists.
President Obama has been unprecedented in his use of the Espionage Act to prosecute those whose whistleblowing he wants to curtail. The purpose of an Espionage Act prosecution, however, is not to punish a person for spying for the enemy, selling secrets for personal gain, or trying to undermine our way of life. It is to ruin the whistleblower personally, professionally and financially. It is meant to send a message to anybody else considering speaking truth to power: challenge us and we will destroy you.
Only ten people in American history have been charged with espionage for leaking classified information, seven of them under Barack Obama. The effect of the charge on a person's life being viewed as a traitor, being shunned by family and friends, incurring massive legal bills is all a part of the plan to force the whistleblower into personal ruin, to weaken him to the point where he will plead guilty to just about anything to make the case go away. I know. The three espionage charges against me made me one of "the Obama Seven".
...
Obama and his attorney general, Eric Holder, declared a war on whistleblowers virtually as soon as they assumed office. Some of the investigations began during the Bush administration, as was the case with NSA whistleblower Thomas Drake, but Espionage Act cases have been prosecuted only under Obama. The president has chosen to ignore the legal definition of whistleblower any person who brings to light evidence of waste, fraud, abuse or illegality and has prosecuted truthtellers.
This policy decision smacks of modern-day McCarthyism. Washington has always needed an "ism" to fight against, an idea against which it could rally its citizens like lemmings. First, it was anarchism, then socialism, then communism. Now, it's terrorism. Any whistleblower who goes public in the name of protecting human rights or civil liberties is accused of helping the terrorists.
more...http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/aug/06/obama-abuse-espionage-act-mccarthyism
Safetykitten
(5,162 posts)MotherPetrie
(3,145 posts)forestpath
(3,102 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)Obama is prosecuting more leakers now because there are more of them.
He also greatly expanded whistleblower protections and created the National Declassification Center, which is working frantically to declassify as much material as possible.
Conflating 'whistleblower' with 'leaker' is shit-stirring, nothing more.
Yeah, McCarthyism. A load of hyperbolic shit that doesn't even care about the facts I pointed out.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]You should never stop having childhood dreams.[/center][/font][hr]
DesMoinesDem
(1,569 posts)"Only ten people in American history have been charged with espionage for leaking classified information, seven of them under Barack Obama."
Your answer is right there in the article. You didn't even need to click on the link. You obviously didn't read past the title.
randome
(34,845 posts)What President has not prosecuted leakers? I didn't say that all Presidents encountered leakers during their terms. If someone leaks classified material, they should be prosecuted. Do you agree or not?
[hr][font color="blue"][center]You should never stop having childhood dreams.[/center][/font][hr]
DesMoinesDem
(1,569 posts)with espionage for leaking classified information. Only 3 other leakers in the history of the US have been charged with espionage. And as the article points out people in his administration leak with impunity. Do you agree that these are facts? Why don't you try reading the article instead of inventing a strawman to argue with. Oh, that's right, you can't actually argue with the point of the article.
randome
(34,845 posts)Is the writer taking the point of view that leakers should be charged with some other crime? What crime would that be and why would that be different than being charged with espionage?
How is it 'abuse' of the Espionage Act to charge an individual with a crime?
[hr][font color="blue"][center]You should never stop having childhood dreams.[/center][/font][hr]
DesMoinesDem
(1,569 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)Why didn't he go the whistleblower route instead of talking about classified information to the press?
He's an idiot, that's why.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]You should never stop having childhood dreams.[/center][/font][hr]
DesMoinesDem
(1,569 posts)At least you're not claiming there is no proof Obama has charged 7 people with espionage.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)and hatred of whistle-blowers or whatever you rename them. in your world everyone should know their place and obey all laws their authoritarian government tells them to. Let me warn you. Your beloved authoritarian state doesnt love you. They will use you and discard you. Choose the side of the people, the side for freedoms and liberties.
randome
(34,845 posts)Why didn't this guy go the whistleblower route instead of blabbing to the press?
What crime should a leaker be charged with instead of the Espionage Act?
[hr][font color="blue"][center]You should never stop having childhood dreams.[/center][/font][hr]
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)and defending Obama. There's a whole big world out there.
randome
(34,845 posts)I'm not so much defending Obama as asking a couple of questions that I think are pertinent to the OP.
Obama is not perfect. Neither is Snowden. There. Does that satisfy you?
[hr][font color="blue"][center]You should never stop having childhood dreams.[/center][/font][hr]
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)But there isn't an easy answer, of course. It's a trap.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]You should never stop having childhood dreams.[/center][/font][hr]
AppleBottom
(201 posts)pnwmom
(108,976 posts)Zero.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)presidents combined.
Obama deeply prefers to work in secret, transparency ain't his thing.
randome
(34,845 posts)Ignore the expanded whistleblower protection acts.
Just focus on the number of people who have been caught leaking classified material and be sure to put the blame on Obama for making those individuals commit crimes.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]You should never stop having childhood dreams.[/center][/font][hr]
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)These are the real issues.
Ellsberg wasn't tortured. Manning was.
randome
(34,845 posts)The guy was suicidal. Even the U.N. representative who said his confinement might have amounted to torture never even saw the guy!
'Abusing prosecutorial discretion', huh? Does the writer say what crime leakers should be charged with instead? Maybe you have an idea?
[hr][font color="blue"][center]You should never stop having childhood dreams.[/center][/font][hr]
pnwmom
(108,976 posts)warrior1
(12,325 posts)MrScorpio
(73,630 posts)Grrrr.
There, time for lunch.
AppleBottom
(201 posts)Talk from politicians is cheap, but you can measure the true character of a person by their acts.
Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)woo me with science
(32,139 posts)and on the fundamental ability of Americans to identify and correct government abuse of power.
It is an assault on the very foundations of this democracy.
pnwmom
(108,976 posts)hundreds of thousands of classified diplomatic documents before?
It was whistle-blowing when Manning released the helicopter videos.
It was a clear violation of the law to leak hundreds of thousands of diplomatic cables for the simple reason that he could.
quinnox
(20,600 posts)and it has continued (and with an ever more aggressive stance!) under Obama.
Manning and Snowden's treatment are prime proof of this phenomena.
randome
(34,845 posts)[hr][font color="blue"][center]You should never stop having childhood dreams.[/center][/font][hr]
quinnox
(20,600 posts)My terminology is spot on.
Mojorabbit
(16,020 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)[hr][font color="blue"][center]You should never stop having childhood dreams.[/center][/font][hr]