Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

DesMoinesDem

(1,569 posts)
Tue Aug 6, 2013, 11:27 AM Aug 2013

Obama's abuse of the Espionage Act is modern-day McCarthyism

Obama's abuse of the Espionage Act is modern-day McCarthyism

Shame on this president for persecuting whistleblowers with a legal relic, while administration officials leak with impunity


The conviction of Bradley Manning under the 1917 Espionage Act, and the US Justice Department's decision to file espionage charges against NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden under the same act, are yet further examples of the Obama administration's policy of using an iron fist against human rights and civil liberties activists.

President Obama has been unprecedented in his use of the Espionage Act to prosecute those whose whistleblowing he wants to curtail. The purpose of an Espionage Act prosecution, however, is not to punish a person for spying for the enemy, selling secrets for personal gain, or trying to undermine our way of life. It is to ruin the whistleblower personally, professionally and financially. It is meant to send a message to anybody else considering speaking truth to power: challenge us and we will destroy you.

Only ten people in American history have been charged with espionage for leaking classified information, seven of them under Barack Obama. The effect of the charge on a person's life – being viewed as a traitor, being shunned by family and friends, incurring massive legal bills – is all a part of the plan to force the whistleblower into personal ruin, to weaken him to the point where he will plead guilty to just about anything to make the case go away. I know. The three espionage charges against me made me one of "the Obama Seven".

...

Obama and his attorney general, Eric Holder, declared a war on whistleblowers virtually as soon as they assumed office. Some of the investigations began during the Bush administration, as was the case with NSA whistleblower Thomas Drake, but Espionage Act cases have been prosecuted only under Obama. The president has chosen to ignore the legal definition of whistleblower – any person who brings to light evidence of waste, fraud, abuse or illegality – and has prosecuted truthtellers.

This policy decision smacks of modern-day McCarthyism. Washington has always needed an "ism" to fight against, an idea against which it could rally its citizens like lemmings. First, it was anarchism, then socialism, then communism. Now, it's terrorism. Any whistleblower who goes public in the name of protecting human rights or civil liberties is accused of helping the terrorists.

more...http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/aug/06/obama-abuse-espionage-act-mccarthyism
37 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Obama's abuse of the Espionage Act is modern-day McCarthyism (Original Post) DesMoinesDem Aug 2013 OP
+1 and remember, Amazon is hiring! Safetykitten Aug 2013 #1
Obama administration: Protecting the torturer, prosecuting the whistleblower MotherPetrie Aug 2013 #2
+1000 forestpath Aug 2013 #20
What President has not prosecuted leakers? Any? randome Aug 2013 #3
"Only ten people in American history have been charged with espionage for leaking classified" DesMoinesDem Aug 2013 #4
That's ignoring my point. randome Aug 2013 #6
You're creating a strawman to argue with. Obama has charged 7 people DesMoinesDem Aug 2013 #10
Why would anyone care what the exact charge is? Someone commits a crime, they get charged. randome Aug 2013 #12
Is that article blocked for you? Why are you not able to read it? DesMoinesDem Aug 2013 #13
I see a lot of whining from someone who got caught. randome Aug 2013 #15
I'll give you some credit. DesMoinesDem Aug 2013 #17
You use of ad hominem attacks is childish. We are fully aware you support the status quo rhett o rick Aug 2013 #19
Care to answer my questions? randome Aug 2013 #21
I will take you more series when you get over your obsessions with vilifying Snowden rhett o rick Aug 2013 #22
So I need to meet your litmus test first? randome Aug 2013 #24
Are you asking if that's all you need to say for me to take you series?? What do you think? nm rhett o rick Aug 2013 #27
I think someone could deign to answer the two questions I posed. randome Aug 2013 #30
You're time is precious don't waste it. nt. AppleBottom Aug 2013 #16
How many before him ever released hundreds of thousands of diplomatic cables? pnwmom Aug 2013 #28
Obama has prosecuted more than all other postwar MannyGoldstein Aug 2013 #5
Sure. Just ignore the National Declassification Center. randome Aug 2013 #9
Abusing prosecutorial discretion, torture, and mooning due process MannyGoldstein Aug 2013 #11
Oh, the hell with Manning. randome Aug 2013 #14
More documents have been stolen and leaked than in all postwar presidents combined. n/t pnwmom Aug 2013 #29
bullshit warrior1 Aug 2013 #7
I guess that's how Obama is supposed to outrage us again today MrScorpio Aug 2013 #8
Thank you for raising awareness on this important issue AppleBottom Aug 2013 #18
Calling something McCarthyism is modern-dayMcCarthyism Drunken Irishman Aug 2013 #23
It is an assault on the First Amendment, on whistleblowing, on investigative journalism, woo me with science Aug 2013 #25
When, in the entire history of the US, has a person ever stolen and disseminated pnwmom Aug 2013 #26
K&R, whistle blowers have been under siege ever since the Bush admin quinnox Aug 2013 #31
At least be accurate. They were not whistleblowers. They were leakers. randome Aug 2013 #32
nah, you are mistaken quinnox Aug 2013 #33
Great job at derailing discussion on this thread. nt Mojorabbit Aug 2013 #34
That's why they call me the human derailleur. randome Aug 2013 #35
K&R woo me with science Aug 2013 #36
HUGE K & R !!! - Thank You !!! WillyT Aug 2013 #37
 

randome

(34,845 posts)
3. What President has not prosecuted leakers? Any?
Tue Aug 6, 2013, 11:34 AM
Aug 2013

Obama is prosecuting more leakers now because there are more of them.

He also greatly expanded whistleblower protections and created the National Declassification Center, which is working frantically to declassify as much material as possible.

Conflating 'whistleblower' with 'leaker' is shit-stirring, nothing more.

Yeah, McCarthyism. A load of hyperbolic shit that doesn't even care about the facts I pointed out.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]You should never stop having childhood dreams.[/center][/font][hr]

 

DesMoinesDem

(1,569 posts)
4. "Only ten people in American history have been charged with espionage for leaking classified"
Tue Aug 6, 2013, 11:37 AM
Aug 2013

"Only ten people in American history have been charged with espionage for leaking classified information, seven of them under Barack Obama."

Your answer is right there in the article. You didn't even need to click on the link. You obviously didn't read past the title.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
6. That's ignoring my point.
Tue Aug 6, 2013, 11:42 AM
Aug 2013

What President has not prosecuted leakers? I didn't say that all Presidents encountered leakers during their terms. If someone leaks classified material, they should be prosecuted. Do you agree or not?
[hr][font color="blue"][center]You should never stop having childhood dreams.[/center][/font][hr]

 

DesMoinesDem

(1,569 posts)
10. You're creating a strawman to argue with. Obama has charged 7 people
Tue Aug 6, 2013, 11:48 AM
Aug 2013

with espionage for leaking classified information. Only 3 other leakers in the history of the US have been charged with espionage. And as the article points out people in his administration leak with impunity. Do you agree that these are facts? Why don't you try reading the article instead of inventing a strawman to argue with. Oh, that's right, you can't actually argue with the point of the article.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
12. Why would anyone care what the exact charge is? Someone commits a crime, they get charged.
Tue Aug 6, 2013, 11:51 AM
Aug 2013

Is the writer taking the point of view that leakers should be charged with some other crime? What crime would that be and why would that be different than being charged with espionage?

How is it 'abuse' of the Espionage Act to charge an individual with a crime?
[hr][font color="blue"][center]You should never stop having childhood dreams.[/center][/font][hr]

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
15. I see a lot of whining from someone who got caught.
Tue Aug 6, 2013, 12:01 PM
Aug 2013

Why didn't he go the whistleblower route instead of talking about classified information to the press?

He's an idiot, that's why.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]You should never stop having childhood dreams.[/center][/font][hr]

 

DesMoinesDem

(1,569 posts)
17. I'll give you some credit.
Tue Aug 6, 2013, 12:11 PM
Aug 2013

At least you're not claiming there is no proof Obama has charged 7 people with espionage.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
19. You use of ad hominem attacks is childish. We are fully aware you support the status quo
Tue Aug 6, 2013, 12:18 PM
Aug 2013

and hatred of whistle-blowers or whatever you rename them. in your world everyone should know their place and obey all laws their authoritarian government tells them to. Let me warn you. Your beloved authoritarian state doesnt love you. They will use you and discard you. Choose the side of the people, the side for freedoms and liberties.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
21. Care to answer my questions?
Tue Aug 6, 2013, 12:24 PM
Aug 2013

Why didn't this guy go the whistleblower route instead of blabbing to the press?

What crime should a leaker be charged with instead of the Espionage Act?
[hr][font color="blue"][center]You should never stop having childhood dreams.[/center][/font][hr]

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
22. I will take you more series when you get over your obsessions with vilifying Snowden
Tue Aug 6, 2013, 04:03 PM
Aug 2013

and defending Obama. There's a whole big world out there.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
24. So I need to meet your litmus test first?
Tue Aug 6, 2013, 04:07 PM
Aug 2013

I'm not so much defending Obama as asking a couple of questions that I think are pertinent to the OP.

Obama is not perfect. Neither is Snowden. There. Does that satisfy you?
[hr][font color="blue"][center]You should never stop having childhood dreams.[/center][/font][hr]

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
30. I think someone could deign to answer the two questions I posed.
Tue Aug 6, 2013, 04:18 PM
Aug 2013

But there isn't an easy answer, of course. It's a trap.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]You should never stop having childhood dreams.[/center][/font][hr]

 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
5. Obama has prosecuted more than all other postwar
Tue Aug 6, 2013, 11:39 AM
Aug 2013

presidents combined.

Obama deeply prefers to work in secret, transparency ain't his thing.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
9. Sure. Just ignore the National Declassification Center.
Tue Aug 6, 2013, 11:47 AM
Aug 2013

Ignore the expanded whistleblower protection acts.

Just focus on the number of people who have been caught leaking classified material and be sure to put the blame on Obama for making those individuals commit crimes.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]You should never stop having childhood dreams.[/center][/font][hr]

 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
11. Abusing prosecutorial discretion, torture, and mooning due process
Tue Aug 6, 2013, 11:51 AM
Aug 2013

These are the real issues.

Ellsberg wasn't tortured. Manning was.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
14. Oh, the hell with Manning.
Tue Aug 6, 2013, 11:54 AM
Aug 2013

The guy was suicidal. Even the U.N. representative who said his confinement might have amounted to torture never even saw the guy!

'Abusing prosecutorial discretion', huh? Does the writer say what crime leakers should be charged with instead? Maybe you have an idea?
[hr][font color="blue"][center]You should never stop having childhood dreams.[/center][/font][hr]

 

AppleBottom

(201 posts)
18. Thank you for raising awareness on this important issue
Tue Aug 6, 2013, 12:17 PM
Aug 2013

Talk from politicians is cheap, but you can measure the true character of a person by their acts.

woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
25. It is an assault on the First Amendment, on whistleblowing, on investigative journalism,
Tue Aug 6, 2013, 04:10 PM
Aug 2013

and on the fundamental ability of Americans to identify and correct government abuse of power.

It is an assault on the very foundations of this democracy.

pnwmom

(108,976 posts)
26. When, in the entire history of the US, has a person ever stolen and disseminated
Tue Aug 6, 2013, 04:14 PM
Aug 2013

hundreds of thousands of classified diplomatic documents before?

It was whistle-blowing when Manning released the helicopter videos.

It was a clear violation of the law to leak hundreds of thousands of diplomatic cables for the simple reason that he could.

 

quinnox

(20,600 posts)
31. K&R, whistle blowers have been under siege ever since the Bush admin
Tue Aug 6, 2013, 04:21 PM
Aug 2013

and it has continued (and with an ever more aggressive stance!) under Obama.

Manning and Snowden's treatment are prime proof of this phenomena.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
32. At least be accurate. They were not whistleblowers. They were leakers.
Tue Aug 6, 2013, 04:25 PM
Aug 2013

[hr][font color="blue"][center]You should never stop having childhood dreams.[/center][/font][hr]

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
35. That's why they call me the human derailleur.
Tue Aug 6, 2013, 06:44 PM
Aug 2013

[hr][font color="blue"][center]You should never stop having childhood dreams.[/center][/font][hr]
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Obama's abuse of the Espi...