Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJPMorgan Sued With Goldman in Aluminum Antitrust Racketeering Case
The banks and Glencore are accused in the complaint filed yesterday in federal court in Tallahassee of racketeering and conspiring with the London Metal Exchange, hoarding aluminum in Detroit-area warehouses and violating federal antitrust laws.
Goldman Sachs was sued on Aug. 1 over similar claims by a Michigan company.
By inserting itself into a healthy industry producing widely needed commodities, severely degrading functionality and widely distributing costs while itself benefiting, Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan couldnt fit a more archetypal description of a parasite on the markets,
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-08-07/jpmorgan-sued-with-goldman-in-aluminum-antitrust-case.html
On October 15, 1970, the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (18 U.S.C. §§ 19611968), commonly referred to as the "RICO Act", became United States law.
The RICO Act allowed law enforcement to charge a person or group of people with racketeering, defined as committing multiple violations of certain varieties within a ten-year period. The purpose of the RICO Act was stated as "the elimination of the infiltration of organized crime and racketeering into legitimate organizations operating in interstate commerce". S.Rep. No. 617, 91st Cong., 1st Sess. 76 (1968). However, the statute is sufficiently broad to encompass illegal activities relating to any enterprise affecting interstate or foreign commerce.
The DOJ will never use the RICO act against these criminal organizations though they are just that.
Anyway good luck to the plaintiff.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 856 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (12)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
JPMorgan Sued With Goldman in Aluminum Antitrust Racketeering Case (Original Post)
Ichingcarpenter
Aug 2013
OP
BlueToTheBone
(3,747 posts)1. I hope this ends in more than a little wrist slap.
I hope there are prison sentences and that this is only the beginning of the flood of arrests.
Ichingcarpenter
(36,988 posts)2. If they win this civil case in Federal Court
then there is really no excuse except for politics for the DOJ to go after them for racketeering.
However I vote politics, too big to jail too big to fail, too big in the pockets of government. will prevail
Besides:
Eric Holder's 1999 Memo Helped Set The Stage For 'Too Big To Jail'
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/04/eric-holder-1999-memo_n_3384980.html
The Rico act is dead.