General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTeen graffiti artist dies after Tasering by Miami Beach cops
Teen graffiti artist dies after Tasering by Miami Beach cops
Israel Hernandez-Llach, the teen artist who died after a tasering by Miami Beach police, was a skilled skateboarder.
BY JULIE K. BROWN
JBROWN@MIAMIHERALD.COM
At just 17, Israel Hernandez-Llach was already an award-winning artist, on the threshold of acclaim in Miami Beach art circles. He was a sculptor, painter, writer and photographer whose craft was inspired by his home country of Colombia and his adopted city, Miami.
He was also a graffiti artist, known as Reefa, who sprayed colorful splashes of paint on the citys abandoned buildings while playing cat-and-mouse with cops, who, like many, consider graffiti taggers to be vandals, not artists.
It was while spray-painting a shuttered McDonalds early Tuesday morning that Hernandez-Llach was chased down by Miami Beach police and shot in the chest with a Taser. He later died.
Miami Beach Police Chief Ray Martinez said Hernandez-Llach was confronted by officers about 5 a.m. as he was vandalizing private property, and he fled, leading officers on a foot chase. It ended at 71st and Harding when he was cornered by police and ran toward the officers, ignoring commands to stop, Martinez said.
Read more here: http://www.miamiherald.com/2013/08/07/3548779/graffiti-artist-dies-after-tasering.html#storylink=cpy
AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)Not always lethal?
Shooting someone with a 9mm Glock is not always lethal.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)He was "vandalizing private property."
Since when is a human being worth more than a shuttered McDonald's?
avaistheone1
(14,626 posts)Hey the jerk managed to desecrate the property with the letter "R". Execution was the only option the authorities had.
LE sure is responsive there.
All is well as Miami Beach sent its best wishes to the family: The city of Miami Beach would like to extend their condolences to the family of Israel Hernandez, And everyone lived happily ever after, well except for this teen and his loved ones. What more could anyone ask from such a lovely community in the sunshine state?
Read more here: http://www.miamiherald.com/2013/08/07/3548779/graffiti-artist-dies-after-tasering.html#storylink=cpy
Octafish
(55,745 posts)Here's how it works in West Virginia, more humane arrest, although they did splash the guy's home address on the front of the newspaper:
Man arrested on felony destruction charge
Main suspect in Parkersburg graffiti case
By MANDI CARDOSI
Parkersburg News and Sentinel, July 26, 2013
PARKERSBURG - A building in downtown Parkersburg led police to a felony destruction of property arrest Wednesday afternoon.
Roger L. Riffle, 33, of 1212 Market St., Apt. A, Parkersburg, was arrested around 1:30 p.m. Wednesday after police detectives and agents with the Parkersburg Narcotics Task Force executed a search warrant on his Market Street apartment.
According to the criminal complaint filed in Wood County Magistrate Court by police detective Matt Eichhorn, sometime between June and July of this year, Riffle defaced the property at 1122 Market St. by painting graffiti on the buildings.
The damage exceeded the felony threshold of $2,500, and is estimated to be around $12,000 in damages, police said.
A preliminary hearing for Riffle will be set in Wood County Magistrate Court before Magistrate Brenda Marshall within 20 days, according to court records.
According to police, the efforts are part of cracking down on a citywide group of graffiti artists.
CONTINUED...
http://www.newsandsentinel.com/page/content.detail/id/576434.html
Poor schmoe shouldn't have been doing what he was doing, but he's still treated as a human being. Really love West Virginians, FWIW. Treated me like family -- and I'm a big, ugly so-and-so, a Luca Brasi doppelgänger.
PS: The only reason I know about this is that I was in the area around then and make a habit of reading the local newspapers on my travels. The article was frontpage, above the fold. I knew I read it for a reason.
kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)they are vandals and I have had about enough of their vandalism of my office over the years.
But to taze one to death? That's just beyond the pale.
5 years of probation and forcing them to pay for the damage they do is generally sufficient.
I despise tagging and would love to see the taggers forced to remove their work. Killed for tagging? No.
magical thyme
(14,881 posts)Save your art for your own property, but certainly you should not be tazed to death (or at all) for vandalism.
Pay to repair the damage and lots of community service works for me.
joeglow3
(6,228 posts)He was tazed for charging police officers and refusing their orders to stop. Of course, this is premised on them telling the truth...
Life Long Dem
(8,582 posts)A cop wrestling with a someone is history. Today they use tasers. It's safer for a cop to use a taser for their own safety instead of wrestling someone.
Logical
(22,457 posts)Life Long Dem
(8,582 posts)Logical
(22,457 posts)When most of them have amazing health care?
Life Long Dem
(8,582 posts)I may have sent that message though. But that's not what I really mean. I think cops should refrain from using tasers and think more on wrestling. But it's easier for them to just use the taser.
Logical
(22,457 posts)Life Long Dem
(8,582 posts)Yeah okay.
Logical
(22,457 posts)Life Long Dem
(8,582 posts)We are agreeing with the main topic. Tasing should be a last resort, much as a cop using a gun.
Nunliebekinder
(33 posts)Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
RedCappedBandit
(5,514 posts)markiv
(1,489 posts)calling him an 'artist' does nothing but undermine the credibility of the account of what happened
frylock
(34,825 posts)i'm sure he absolutely ruined the aesthetic beauty of the shuttered McDonalds with his spray cans.
joeglow3
(6,228 posts)Just because I chose to shutter my building does not mean my property is now open target to anyone claiming to be an artist. Maybe if he left his card and was willing to pay for the clean up when I sold the building. If not, then he is a criminal who is costing me money.
frylock
(34,825 posts)joeglow3
(6,228 posts)City pays to remove all this "art." But, it is okay because it happened in a different town.
frylock
(34,825 posts)correct me if i'm wrong, but wasn't this discussion about the defacing of a shuttered McDonald's? wouldn't the McDonald's be considered to be private property? if so, wouldn't the owner of this private property be responsible for clean up, rather than the municipality?
joeglow3
(6,228 posts)You weren't shot at. Should't just his family care?
you really want to equate the murder of that kid to graffiti, vandalism, and tagging? is that what you're doing here?
joeglow3
(6,228 posts)At what point on the spectrum do I get to be upset at a crime that doesn't affect me directly?
But, I think you know that and are looking for a way out.
darkangel218
(13,985 posts)If a kids life is less worth than the cost of painting over a wall.
Sick!!
joeglow3
(6,228 posts)How about if someone steals from a store?
How about if someone holds up a bank?
How about if someone mugs a teen?
Mugs an old lady?
It is a spectrum. If you think it is "sick" to draw an extreme end of the spectrum, fine. But tell me where on this spectrum the line exists where I can be upset with a crime that doesn't affect me directly.
frylock
(34,825 posts)a crime is a crime is a crime. am I correct in this assessment?
joeglow3
(6,228 posts)That is you making shit up to justify your flawed logic. The poster above made the claim that I should not care about this crime because it did not cost me anything. I am saying it is possible to say both are wrong without saying both are equally wrong.
Now, can you finally answer my question of where on the spectrum can I start to care about someone committing a crime that doesn't affect me directly?
markiv
(1,489 posts)would it be art? or vandalism?
if you dont draw the line at permission or ownership of what's sprayed on, then where DO you draw it?
grafitti, while artisic in some examples, on the whole degrades areas and conotates gang territory
it's victims are first urban young themselves, who grow up around gangs
frylock
(34,825 posts)markiv
(1,489 posts)how NIMBY of you
frylock
(34,825 posts)there's quite a bit of graffiti in my neighborhood, including two pieces by renowned French artist Space Invader, as well as some very impressive stencil work in the same vein as Banksy. do you consider Banksy to be an artist, or is he just a vandal as well?
joeglow3
(6,228 posts)What if I think the picture I carved into your car is a political statement and, thus, art?
Vandalism, by its definition is wilfully defacing someone else's property. So, yes, Banksy is a vandal.
kentauros
(29,414 posts)I'm not versed in the law, so I'm just guessing here.
Is it still vandalism when the property owner has abandoned the property and all structures on it? I would guess in this case, the police were following the letter of the law instead of the spirit of the law. The property owner doesn't appear to care for their property any longer, or those structures wouldn't have been abandoned. Also, it seems like the city could step in with eminent domain and take care of (demolish) buildings no one wants any longer.
If they were occupied, I could agree that they have been vandalized. But how can vandalism apply to something that is no longer wanted by the property owner?
I'd say that this young man was being responsible in how he applied his art, in that he only used abandoned, and no longer wanted, structures as his "canvas."
joeglow3
(6,228 posts)Is the property owner paying their property taxes? If not, has the city seized the property under a tax lien? If so, it would probably be city property at that point and they would make the determination.
Frankly, any way you slice it, unless you get express permission, I fail to see how it would not be deemed to be vandalism.
Logical
(22,457 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)is this like "breaking windows?"
rdking647
(5,113 posts)after all its "art"
frylock
(34,825 posts)what's with the obsession on cars? graffiti artists typically use walls. seen some gorgeous throw ups on fr8s, but never on cars. this story never once mentions a car. what gives?
magical thyme
(14,881 posts)Likewise, public property is public property. No one individual has the right to paint somebody else's private property or a town's public property.
No more than my asshole neighbor had a right to cut down the 5' tall grasses on the island between MY horseshoe driveway and the street. MY island, MY driveway, MY grass. It provided me with a little privacy from the road, which he stole from me. You don't like the way my yard looks? Get the fuck over it. I don't like the way your home looks. It spoils MY view. But that doesn't give me the right to bulldoze it over the cliff behind it, as tempting as that may be. (Especially if he happens to be in it at the time.)
However ugly we may find McDonald's, the fact is it was THEIR property, not his, and he had no right to paint it. Any more than he has a right to paint my house.
That said, I don't think anybody here has defended the police's right to taze somebody to death over defacement of property.
frylock
(34,825 posts)they may not have the courage to say it outright, but it's been more than implied.
ripcord
(5,327 posts)Or is you have permission from the property owner it is art, it you don't have permission it is vandalism.
LWolf
(46,179 posts)Art is not the same thing as tagging gang symbols. In my opinion.
I especially like reverse graffiti.
http://www.environmentalgraffiti.com/featured/35-greatest-works-of-reverse-graffiti/1949
kentauros
(29,414 posts)And, the city's reaction to graffiti with blocks of cover-up paint looks a hell of a lot worse overall.
I wonder what the reaction would be by a city (and its population) if someone did their graffiti in Islamic script...?
frylock
(34,825 posts)kentauros
(29,414 posts)But I was thinking how would people in the US react to seeing something like that show up on a city/private wall one day? I think more than a few people would be "upset" to say the least
lunamagica
(9,967 posts)Ichingcarpenter
(36,988 posts)according to witness reports
According to Hernandez' friends, they said the officers shoved Hernandez against a wall and was then motionless on the ground. "His body was on the floor like motionless, and they were all just laughing, "said Souza.
Fernandez and Souza said the officers were high-fiving and congratulating each other as their friend was in need of medical help. "That made me feel terrible inside. These cops are gruesome, and they don't really care," said Fernandez.
Hernandez was transported to the hospital where doctors pronounced him dead.
Read more: http://www.wptv.com/dpp/news/state/israel-hernandez-dies-after-miami-beach-police-taser-him-following-chase-after-vandalism#ixzz2bOUpW648
damnedifIknow
(3,183 posts)They have to be sick to do that. Immature and off in the head.
otohara
(24,135 posts)none of them can be trusted - my once sweet nephew turned into a real dick after becoming a cop.
joeglow3
(6,228 posts)So, everyone I know who is a cop is a dick because your nephew is a dick. GREAT logic there.
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)Is every one of them a dick? No, but apparently enough are.
I say it's time for a national commission on law enforcement standards and practices.
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)vast overuse of violence is an endemic problem with law enforcement
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)they have no choice over : gender, race, sexual orientation
judging people for choices of careers is something that is common to both parties (investment bankers, ceo's, cops etc)
otohara
(24,135 posts)who wanted to help people by becoming a cop turned into a douche and racist.
Everyday we read about cops killing the wrong people with multiple gun shots, stop/frisks brown/blacks, searching female genitals, beating people, taking pictures with a known murderer, killing dogs, spraying students in the face, being dicks to occupy protestors, nicey nicey to tea-baggers, profiling cars with Colorado plates, raping women in custody, suing states for taking a stand against gun violence.
They seem to be on the side of gun owners vs those who aren't.
Yeah, cops are dicks and can't be trusted - my nephew was just one of many.
He lost his leg/arm off duty in an accident and no longer harassing citizens.
SummerSnow
(12,608 posts)darkangel218
(13,985 posts)That fucking simple.
Brigid
(17,621 posts)To be carried out by cops who then high-five one another and crow over their handiwork?
Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)cthulu2016
(10,960 posts)How fucked up does a person's mental process have to be to consider "vandal" and "artist" mutually exclusive categories?
sosuaslayde
(15 posts)The police state is becoming large and unaccountable. With civil forfeiture laws and increasing amount of abuse- were in big trouble. That being said- these kids are not artists. They have no right to paint any building that does not belong to them. If you wanna bring down property values- just ad graffiti! You call them artist- I call them punks. However, probably not a offense that deserves being tazed
LWolf
(46,179 posts)Stay out of Florida.
Zorra
(27,670 posts)Lee-Lee
(6,324 posts)In fact it is an escalation of force by him in an attempt to escape.
I wonder what then Monday Morning Quarterbacks here think the cops should do when a person they are attempting to arrest charges them?
darkangel218
(13,985 posts)The perp was an unarmed teen. Fuking tackle him down like they learn in the police academy!!
Tasers should be Fuking banned!!!!!! They killl!!!
Lee-Lee
(6,324 posts)Tasers have been shown to be far safer than tackling and restoring to hands on physical violence. For both parties. Wrestling and fighting with a person who may have a knife or other weapon is a much greater risk for the officers, and once you go hands on eyes can get gouged out, people get bit, and there is a much greater risk of exposure to blood borne pathogens.
Fighting isn't like the movies.
I have been tased. Every officer who carries a taser has taken the ride before they are allowed to use it. Deaths are very rare, and almost always either it was a preexisting heart condition that a physical struggle also can cause to go bad, or drug use.
There is no doubt that the taser is safer than a physical confrontation- for the officers and the suspect. People die from fights too, and given that once you are fighting with a suspect they often try to grab for the gun fights can and do lead to shootings.
Life isn't like the movies.
darkangel218
(13,985 posts)from being tased in the past years?? You wanna tell me tackling down a teen causes more injury than causing him a cardiac arrest???
Holy shit!!!
Lee-Lee
(6,324 posts)You may see reports, but there are lots of deaths and injuries from other physical methods, they just don't get sensationalized as much.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/17/tasers-safer-than-batons_n_361012.html
Using a Taser to subdue a violent suspect is safer than police batons and fists. That is the surprising conclusion of a study of incidents in which US police used force to tackle a person who was resisting arrest.
Several suspects have died in the US after being tasered, and human rights groups have spoken out against the weapons, also called conductive electrical devices (CEDs). But John MacDonald of the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia and colleagues have found they seem to result in fewer injuries than more conventional methods such as batons.
The team examined over 24,000 cases where police had used force, including almost 5500 incidents involving a Taser. After controlling for factors such as the amount of resistance shown by the suspect, they found that Taser use reduced the overall risk of injury by 65 per cent.
The taser may sound more evil to you, and the media always makes a bigger deal in the rarer event one causes a death, but every single study done has had the same results- tasers are shown to be safer.
Until you can invent the magic method to subdue a non-compliant subject with zero chance of injury, there is risk in any method. But despite the hype tasers are shown to be safer.
darkangel218
(13,985 posts)Save it for others who know nothing about how deadly a taser shot can be.
Lee-Lee
(6,324 posts)And I have actually read and studied beyond that.
In other words you have a partial amount of classroom training, I have classroom and real world experience right down to being tased myself.
I suggest if you want to be a successful nurse you take time to study real facts and statistics, not go by emotion. In this case you are choosing to ignore mounds of real, evidence based, sound science that shows tasers are a safer alternative than going with fists or batons.
darkangel218
(13,985 posts)Are you a former LEO??
And like all departments mine required us to be tased before we could use one.
In NC part of your Basic Law Enforcement Training is the NC Medical Responder course, essentially one level below EMT-B. At least it was then. The school gave us the option of doing the extra hours, it was only like 40-50 more, and testing for EMT-B and I did after I finished BLET while I was applying at departments.
I did the volunteer rescue squad deal for a little while, but the politics in it left a bad taste in my mouth so I quit not longer after getting a full time LE job.
darkangel218
(13,985 posts)Like I would expect you to side with the victim or admit how dangereus tasers are.
Have a nice life.
Lee-Lee
(6,324 posts)You are quoting.... nothing but your uninformed option.
Good luck with a nursing career where you ignore science.
darkangel218
(13,985 posts)I hope I never treat any of your victims!
Good bye and good ridance!!
Tasers KILL!! But of course they're so much more convenient!
Sickening.
Niceguy1
(2,467 posts)Have unanticipated consequnces.
In this case he made the choice to vandalize.
Bad decision #1
Then he made the choice to run.
Bad decision #2
Then he made the choice to resist arrest.
Bad decision #3
The outcome sucks, but he was in the drivers seat the entire time.
rdking647
(5,113 posts)same result... more risk to the cop
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)Taser-related deaths in the US:
http://electronicvillage.blogspot.com/2009/05/taser-related-deaths-in-united-states.html
darkangel218
(13,985 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)and fill him full of holes. Charging cops is an easy way to commit suicide in America. I doubt that was the kids intentions, but he would be alive (maybe) if he would have gotten 'into the position'. Can't charge cops in 2013. Not unless you want to die.
darkangel218
(13,985 posts)Does that give them the right to tase the shit out of him?? Was he armed?? Was he overpowering them???
What about old school subduing the suspect???
Rex
(65,616 posts)Just a sad comment about cops in 2013. Heaven forbid anyone try and TALK anymore. No, much easier to just pull a trigger.
darkangel218
(13,985 posts)Cops are abusing their power though, and its well documented. How many more unnecessary deaths before anyone says anything??
Rex
(65,616 posts)Probably going to take some uber rich and connected person, maybe it happens to their son, before anyone will do anything about it. It is obvious that the working class doesn't count for anything.
rdking647
(5,113 posts)the cops hit him with their night stick and cracked his skull or tackled him and he hit his head on the ground and died.
same result and no one would really br calling the cops out for excess force.
the fact is if your stupid enough to charge a cop your risking your life. and sometimes you lose
and graffiti is vandalism.
darkangel218
(13,985 posts)He would be alive today if not jolted with a taser.
I protect and save. Why can't LE do the same??
In my rounds in the ER I met many LEOs who were pissed off beyond belief that they had to " write reports" when they were supposed to get off their shift.
Excuse me, is writing reports more important than someones life?????
Sick!!! All around.
rdking647
(5,113 posts)all the cop knows is someone is coming at him after being ordered to stop.
ill criticsize a cop when needed but this time i cant blame them
darkangel218
(13,985 posts)Just pray it doesn't happen to you.
boomer55
(592 posts)The police responded appropriately.
darkangel218
(13,985 posts)So he painted a MC D wall. Legally, vandalized it.
They could have let him go and picked him up in the morning. I don't believe the whole charging the officers claim. He wasn't even armed!!!
I call BS. They plain and simple killed him.
rdking647
(5,113 posts)anyone who doesnt know charging a cop is supremely stupid is an idiot
0rganism
(23,937 posts)how closely it aligns with reality may be a matter for further debate; there were other eyewitnesses.
0rganism
(23,937 posts)"Artist" and "vandal" are not mutually exclusive categories. If you read the article:
"He was a sculptor, painter, writer and photographer" -- at 17, he may have just been beginning the exploration of his artistic potential, but I see no reason to deny him the label. Especially when the article says this:
"a number of his pieces were exhibited at various galleries and museums in the area"
Whether the police responded appropriately is another question -- of course, all we have to go on is their account of how events transpired.
-- edit --
I was wrong about that last bit. Reading the linked article more closely, it's got eyewitness accounts that appear to be at odds with the officers' claims that Hernandez charged them.
"Félix Hernández said he saw about five police officers chasing Hernández and shoving him against a wall. Then he saw his friend on the ground, surrounded by police."
Doesn't read like he charged them at all, and frankly I don't see why he would -- any vandal with living brain cells would be more interested in escape than confrontation, and surrender over attack.
boomer55
(592 posts)Kid sounds like he had potential and he wasted it by engaging in criminal activity.
0rganism
(23,937 posts)Plenty of accounts of drug raids by police that hit the wrong address, people set free after decades of imprisonment for crimes they didn't commit, etcetera. Now whether that's pertinent in this case is another story, but it runs counter to your boiled-down assertion.
I do think most Americans, even most Floridians, would concur that a juvenile's acts of vandalism and resisting arrest hardly merit a death sentence.
Agree with you about the wasted potential, but he didn't waste it without help from the cops.
frylock
(34,825 posts)i'm not buying the police account either.
Their notion of him posing a threat is hard to fathom -- I might buy that he was running towards the police trying to dodge around them if he was cornered, since he apparently led them on quite the chase before that, but it's a stretch.
frylock
(34,825 posts)BeyondGeography
(39,367 posts)KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)sketches to show prospective patrons.
As for gang members and idiots marking their territory like animals? Guess what, if the police spot you do NOT charge them.
frylock
(34,825 posts)there appears to be some confusion regarding graffiti and tagging. these are tags:
this is also a form of tagging called a throw up. somewhat more artistic than just a simple tag, no?
this is graffiti art:
you'll note the tags on the paper vending machine in the foreground. can anyone honestly state that there is no difference between the two?
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)tagging to me.
frylock
(34,825 posts)so much fucking binary thinking in this thread.