New York Times Dangerously Ignores Its Own Words In Calling For Extradition of Edward Snowden
New York Times Dangerously Ignores Its Own Words In Calling For Extradition of Edward Snowden
Its important to point out that the New York Times editorial board is independent of New York Times journalists, many of whom may be ashamed that their paper implicitly told future sources of secret information that they will not protect them under government pressure. Notably, just last week, after Jeffrey Toobin said on CNN that Edward Snowden committed a crime worthy of jail, New York Times reporter James Risen shot back: We wouldnt be having this discussion if it wasnt for him. Thats the thing I dont understand about the climate in Washington these days, is that people want to have debates on television and elsewhere, but then you want to throw the people who start the debates in jail.
................................
Finally, the New York Times ended its Snowden statement yesterday by saying this:
And does he really feel safer in a country where Mr. Putin, an increasingly authoritarian leader, has jailed and persecuted his critics?
It should go without saying that Putins treatment of whistleblowers and journalists in his own country is deplorable, but that does not delegitimize Snowdens asylum claim in any way. Right now, he is walking around a free man, able to contribute to the ongoing debate in the US if he so wishes. That almost certainly feels safer than being locked in a cage, held incommunicado, possibly surrounded by violent criminals, and facing life in prison, as he would be if he came home.
MORE:
https://pressfreedomfoundation.org/blog/2013/08/new-york-times-dangerously-ignores-its-own-words-calling-extradition-edward-snowden
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/07/opinion/whats-the-point-of-a-summit.html?ref=opinion