Paul Krugman Blog- Milton Friedman, Unperson
Brutal analysis:
Friedmans larger problem, Id argue, is that he was, when all is said and done, a man trying to straddle two competing world views and our political environment no longer has room for that kind of straddle.
Think of it this way: Friedman was an avid free-market advocate, who insisted that the market, left to itself, could solve almost any problem. Yet he was also a macroeconomic realist, who recognized that the market definitely did not solve the problem of recessions and depressions. So he tried to wall off macroeconomics from everything else, and make it as inoffensive to laissez-faire sensibilities as possible. Yes, he in effect admitted, we do need stabilization policy but we can minimize the governments role by relying only on monetary policy, none of that nasty fiscal stuff, and then not even allowing the monetary authority any discretion.
At a fundamental level, however, this was an inconsistent position: if markets can go so wrong that they cause Great Depressions, how can you be a free-market true believer on everything except macro? And as American conservatism moved ever further right, it had no room for any kind of interventionism, not even the sterilized, clean-room interventionism of Friedmans monetarism.
So Friedman has vanished from the policy scene so much so that I suspect that a few decades from now, historians of economic thought will regard him as little more than an extended footnote.
the rest-
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/08/08/milton-friedman-unperson/?_r=0