Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Archae

(46,325 posts)
Fri Aug 9, 2013, 12:17 AM Aug 2013

Why is the Nagasaki bomb the "Forgotten Bomb?" Even here?

I saw lots of articles, posts and comments on August 6th.

I saw none so far, today.

And while the Nagasaki bomb was more powerful, due to terrain, the damage and death was less.

But still horrible.

Did we "burn ourselves out" on the 6th?

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why is the Nagasaki bomb the "Forgotten Bomb?" Even here? (Original Post) Archae Aug 2013 OP
Hiroshima is the 2nd most horrid word in the American lexicon, succeeded only by NAGASAKI usGovOwesUs3Trillion Aug 2013 #1
Not a valid argument. Agschmid Aug 2013 #4
Post removed Post removed Aug 2013 #5
Because Hiroshima was the first atomic weapon used. n/t PoliticAverse Aug 2013 #2
I wrote about Nagasaki on the 5th, in my only comment about the bombings. . . Journeyman Aug 2013 #3
Because it sickens me too much to talk about here. nt Bonobo Aug 2013 #6
Who was the second person to fly across the Atlantic? nt Deep13 Aug 2013 #7
Well-the first wasn't who you think... catnhatnh Aug 2013 #10
Because Nagasaki is the more disturbing event... hunter Aug 2013 #8
Not everyone forgets... sarisataka Aug 2013 #9
 

usGovOwesUs3Trillion

(2,022 posts)
1. Hiroshima is the 2nd most horrid word in the American lexicon, succeeded only by NAGASAKI
Fri Aug 9, 2013, 12:18 AM
Aug 2013

Imagine How Many Lives Would Have Been Saved IF We Had Accepted Japans 1 Condition Earlier? http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023417433

Never Forget!

peace

Response to Agschmid (Reply #4)

Journeyman

(15,031 posts)
3. I wrote about Nagasaki on the 5th, in my only comment about the bombings. . .
Fri Aug 9, 2013, 12:29 AM
Aug 2013

In it, I point out that deaths attributed to leukemia occurred more often at Hiroshima than Nagasaki, for the United States experimented with uranium on the first city, plutonium on the next.

As I concluded then, we can pray for ourselves, if we like. Not that I believe it will matter.

hunter

(38,311 posts)
8. Because Nagasaki is the more disturbing event...
Fri Aug 9, 2013, 01:24 AM
Aug 2013

... it was an experimental test of "the bomb of the future."

The U.S.A. made five Hiroshima type bombs.This design was considered too dangerous and too expensive to stockpile. Nobody wants to be around an atomic bomb that can go off by accident, in a plane crash, lightning strike, etc...

U.S.A. military leaders knew we'd be making hundreds, maybe thousands of plutonium implosion bombs, and wanted to see what one would do to a living city. Nagasaki was crawling with U.S. researchers soon after Japan surrendered.

120 of those "Fat Man" bombs were made; in 1950 had all been replaced with more sophisticated designs.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why is the Nagasaki bomb ...