Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWho's Afraid of the People's History?
http://www.alternet.org/civil-liberties/whos-afraid-peoples-historyA recent Associated Press exposedrawing on e-mails obtained under the Freedom of Information Actrevealed that in 2010, Mitch Daniels, then Indianas Republican governor, covertly set out to ban Howard Zinns best-selling A Peoples History of the United States from Indianas classrooms. Daniels had privately responded to Zinns death that year with unseemly glee; This terrible anti-American academic has finally passed away, he crowed. Daniels attempted to banish Zinns book on the grounds that it was a truly execrable, anti-factual piece of disinformation that misstates American history on every page . How do we get rid of it before more young people are force-fed a totally false version of our history? When Danielss education adviser replied that A Peoples History was being used in a social movements course for teachers at Indiana University, the governor insisted that this crap should not be accepted for any credit by the state, sparking a proposed statewide review of university courses designed to disqualify propaganda from Indianas curriculum.
This view of A Peoples History as propaganda was not shared by the historians who named it a finalist for the American Book Award in 1981an honor virtually never accorded to historical surveysor by the more than 2 million readers who made A Peoples History the most popular radical history in the United States during the last three decades.
As governor, Daniels seemed unconcerned that purging Zinn from Indianas educational system constituted a violation of academic freedom. But this issue emerged in the political storm unleashed by the AP story, in part because Daniels is currently president of Purdue University. Aware that trampling academic freedom is incompatible with leadership in higher education, Daniels sought to evade the issue by claiming (falsely) that he had respected academic freedom at the university level and only sought to keep Zinn out of the K-12 educational curriculum.
Upset by Danielss refusal to admit last week that he had erred in seeking to ban Zinn, dozens of Purdues faculty, including some of its most prominent historians, wrote an open letter explaining how troubled they were by his failure either to stand up for academic inquiry and exchange or to realize that academic freedom is essential to all levels of education. The American Historical Association condemned Danielss war on Zinn as inappropriate and a violation of academic freedom, and championed open discussion of controversial books, which benefits students, historians, and the general public alike. Attempts to single out particular texts for suppression from a school or university curriculum, the AHA wrote, have no place in a democratic society.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 721 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Who's Afraid of the People's History? (Original Post)
xchrom
Aug 2013
OP
Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)1. Oy vey!
I love this: "anti-factual piece of disinformation that misstates American history on every page
."
So, when I was in school back I the 1840's, we learned about ONE female in history, Betsy Ross, who sewed a flag. We learned about ONE African-American, George Washington Carver. Hispanics. Nope. Apparently you guys didn't exist even though I was in CALIFORNIA at the time. We learned that Columbus "discovered" America and that what we did to the "Indians" was OK because it was all in the name of progress. Is this what Daniels wants to go back to?
And he's the President of Perdue? Again, Oy vey!
onethatcares
(16,165 posts)2. I just received my copy
from Alternative Radio.