General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNYT to Obama: A Weak Agenda on Spying Reform
A Weak Agenda on Spying Reform
By THE EDITORIAL BOARD
Published: August 9, 2013 76 Comments
President Obama, who seems to think the American people simply need some reassurance that their privacy rights are intact, proposed a series of measures on Friday that only tinker around the edges of the nations abusive surveillance programs.
-edit-
Fundamentally, Mr. Obama does not seem to understand that the nation needs to hear more than soothing words about the governments spying enterprise. He suggested that if ordinary people trusted the government not to abuse their privacy, they wouldnt mind the vast collection of phone and e-mail data.
Bizarrely, he compared the need for transparency to showing his wife that he had done the dishes, rather than just telling her he had done so. Out-of-control surveillance is a bit more serious than kitchen chores. It is the existence of these programs that is the problem, not whether they are modestly transparent. As long as the N.S.A. believes it has the right to collect records of every phone call and the administration released a white paper Friday that explained, unconvincingly, why it is perfectly legal then none of the promises to stay within the law will mean a thing.
If all Mr. Obama is inclined to do is tweak these programs, then Congress will have to step in to curb these abuses, a path many lawmakers of both parties are already pursuing. There are bills pending that would stop the bulk collection of communications data, restricting it to those under suspicion of terrorism. Other measures would require the surveillance court to make public far more of its work. If the president is truly concerned about public anxiety, he can vocally support legislation to make meaningful changes, rather than urging people to trust him that the dishes are clean.
www.nytimes.com/2013/08/10/opinion/a-weak-agenda-on-spying-reform.html?smid=tw-share
And this comment from reader Karen Garcia sums it up:
That kitchen analogy not only fell flat, it reeked of the desperation of a demagogue who feels his control slipping away. The president essentially compared the Surveillance State to a henpecked husband (himself.) And we, the victims of government overreach, are the hysterical overbearing Lucy Ricardos with our silly concerns and demands for proof of his divine benevolence.
We won't be invited to the show or get a seat at the table, but he'll put up a webpage, maybe have another Google+ Hangout, invite a bunch of Villagers to meet behind closed doors, order a few more drone strikes, croon out a few more love songs, and proclaim that all is well in Happy Land, all the while reminding God to bless America.
This must be what Hannah Arendt meant by the banality of evil.
xchrom
(108,903 posts)kelliekat44
(7,759 posts)dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)rec
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
forestpath
(3,102 posts)contempt for them and for anyone who believes in them.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023439446