Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

KansDem

(28,498 posts)
Sat Aug 10, 2013, 10:03 AM Aug 2013

Development near Hollywood fault allowed without seismic study

LA Times

A sprawling $200-million commercial and residential development under construction next to the Pantages Theatre on Hollywood Boulevard was approved by Los Angeles city officials without a seismic evaluation, even though it sits next to an active earthquake fault capable of producing a devastating temblor, according to records and interviews.

Under California law, developers building in seismic zones mapped by the state are required to study the exact location of all active faults it has mapped. Those studies involve digging into the ground, looking for signs of the fault. But the state has not yet mapped the Hollywood fault zone, leaving enforcement of the law in a gray area.

Although the city could require a seismic evaluation, it didn’t do so in the case of Blvd6200.



6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Development near Hollywood fault allowed without seismic study (Original Post) KansDem Aug 2013 OP
If the city didn't require the fault to be found, you'd think LuvNewcastle Aug 2013 #1
Here's what happened there during the Northridge quake. Wilms Aug 2013 #2
Was that the quake of 1971? KansDem Aug 2013 #4
This one was 1994. n/t Wilms Aug 2013 #5
'71 was the Sylmar quake. LWolf Aug 2013 #6
Maybe the developer met and exceeded all the structural standards for building.. Tikki Aug 2013 #3

LuvNewcastle

(16,846 posts)
1. If the city didn't require the fault to be found, you'd think
Sat Aug 10, 2013, 10:28 AM
Aug 2013

their insurer would want to have that information. They must have spread a lot of grease on the wheels to get this project approved. I would like to know how much of a return they expect to get from this investment.

KansDem

(28,498 posts)
4. Was that the quake of 1971?
Sat Aug 10, 2013, 04:53 PM
Aug 2013

I was living in Long Beach then. I had an early class at LBCC and was debating getting out of bed. It was around 6am and my class was at 7am.

The quake hit and I got out of bed in a hurry!

LWolf

(46,179 posts)
6. '71 was the Sylmar quake.
Sat Aug 10, 2013, 10:46 PM
Aug 2013

A 6.6, iir.

Northridge was '94, a 6.7. It was scarier, because my family was scattered over a wide distance that morning, and it was a few days before we were able to locate all of them and get them home.

Tikki

(14,557 posts)
3. Maybe the developer met and exceeded all the structural standards for building..
Sat Aug 10, 2013, 12:23 PM
Aug 2013

in So. Cal. There are other buildings in that zone. Should they be torn down or
retro-fitted to meet Earthquake Standards?
Knowing that area, bet they were retro-fitted and retro-fitted well above standard.


Tikki

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Development near Hollywoo...