General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDevelopment near Hollywood fault allowed without seismic study
LA TimesUnder California law, developers building in seismic zones mapped by the state are required to study the exact location of all active faults it has mapped. Those studies involve digging into the ground, looking for signs of the fault. But the state has not yet mapped the Hollywood fault zone, leaving enforcement of the law in a gray area.
Although the city could require a seismic evaluation, it didnt do so in the case of Blvd6200.
LuvNewcastle
(16,846 posts)their insurer would want to have that information. They must have spread a lot of grease on the wheels to get this project approved. I would like to know how much of a return they expect to get from this investment.
Wilms
(26,795 posts)KansDem
(28,498 posts)I was living in Long Beach then. I had an early class at LBCC and was debating getting out of bed. It was around 6am and my class was at 7am.
The quake hit and I got out of bed in a hurry!
Wilms
(26,795 posts)LWolf
(46,179 posts)A 6.6, iir.
Northridge was '94, a 6.7. It was scarier, because my family was scattered over a wide distance that morning, and it was a few days before we were able to locate all of them and get them home.
Tikki
(14,557 posts)in So. Cal. There are other buildings in that zone. Should they be torn down or
retro-fitted to meet Earthquake Standards?
Knowing that area, bet they were retro-fitted and retro-fitted well above standard.
Tikki