General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPress Corps Fails To Ask Any NSA Questions At Obama’s NSA Press Conference
Press Corps Fails To Ask Any NSA Questions At Obamas NSA Press Conference
Gregory Ferenstein
kid-head-slap
The White House Press Corps just completely botched the one opportunity we had to learn details about the National Security Agencys spying program, and the rationale for sweeping government surveillance. During the hour-long press conference President Obama held specifically to answer questions about the NSA, not a single journalist asked him details about the NSA. As a result, we learned precisely zero information from something slated to be critically informative.
-edit-
Lets review:
Today, President Obama held a last-minute press conference to announce 4 vague reforms to the intelligence community. We have more details here, but essentially, it boils down to 1) a new independent NSA review board that will publish recommendations on protecting civil liberties 2) a new website detailing the surveillance activities 3) changes to the Patriot Act authorizing the spying, and 4) a new public advocate to argue cases in the secret court that grants the NSA spying requests.
After the announcements, Obama opened himself up to questions. Because no one asked any details about the NSA, Heres what we still dont know:
1). Do foreign governments swap information with one another to skirt spying laws? British spy agencies reportedly tap the undersea cables used to carry Internet data and share it with the NSA. The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) may forbid American agencies from collecting information on domestic targets, but we have no idea whether Britains equivalent, the GCHQ, is listening in on American phone calls abroad or watching their Internet behavior (then sharing it with US agents).
2). Have the NSA programs ever actually stopped an attack? A new NSA report [PDF] released today defending its practices notes that surveillance practices helped stop Najibullah Zazi from bombing the New York City Subway. But, as Ben Smith from BuzzFeed argues, its likely the first tip came from local police officers, who discovered evidence from a hard-drive of a co-conspirator, collected during the course of normal policy work. Will this new agency have to prove that the programs have ever been useful?
Senator Ron Wyden, who has seen the intelligence reports, likewise does not think theyve been effective.
As far as we can see, all of the useful information that it has provided appears to have also been available through other collection methods, he wrote in a letter.
3). Why is it OK to monitor activity, even if its not read? The NSA reportedly keeps data for 5 years. More importantly, it looks at the communications of anyone who is 3 hops from a suspect (a friend of a friend of a friend). The average person is 3 degrees away from millions of people, which effectively allows the NSA to spy on anyone adult they want. Simply holding the data may be ripe for abuse.
-edit-
http://techcrunch.com/2013/08/09/press-corps-fails-to-ask-any-nsa-questions-at-obamas-nsa-press-conference/
~~~~
Do the people who have access ("journalists" , even care?
Roselma
(540 posts)just didn't like the questions or answers. Transcript of full presser here:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/transcript-president-obamas-august-9-2013-news-conference-at-the-white-house/2013/08/09/5a6c21e8-011c-11e3-9a3e-916de805f65d_story.html
chimpymustgo
(12,774 posts)-edit-
In fairness, Chuck Todd of MSNBC did ask about whistleblower Edward Snowden. Obama replied, No, I do not think Mr. Snowden is a patriot. Its an important question, if only symbolically, since the U.S. will be seeking legal action regardless of how Obama talks about Snowden.
-edit-
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)Plus you misspelled "corpse".