Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
Mon Aug 12, 2013, 10:46 AM Aug 2013

FBI can remotely activate Android and laptop microphones, reports WSJ

Last month, we discussed whether the new Microsoft Kinect could be used as an NSA spying tool. When it comes to the microphones in Android cell phones and laptop computers, though, surveillance might not be a theoretical question. The Wall Street Journal reports that the FBI can already remotely activate those microphones to record conversations.

That's according to a single anonymous former US official, mind you, and neither the FBI nor Google was willing to confirm or deny the report, but remotely forcing a cellular mic to eavesdrop isn't a new idea. The FBI's so-called "roving bugs" were used against alleged mobsters in 2004, and in 2002 the FBI kept tabs on supposed criminals using the microphone in a vehicle's emergency call system. What's new, according to several former anonymous officials, is a dedicated FBI group which regularly hacks into computers, using both custom and off-the-shelf surveillance software which it buys from private companies.

According to one of the Journal's sources, the "Remote Operations Unit" will sometimes install that software by plugging in a physical device like a USB drive, but can also do it over the internet like any other trojan, by "using a document or link that loads software when the person clicks or views it." While that source also claims the FBI takes care to make sure that only "relevant data" gets collected, it's still a little troubling to know that such a thing is easily possible and regularly done. It's worth noting that the government generally needs a warrant to conduct such surveillance activity, particularly where private content like audio conversations are concerned, but that assumes the US government doesn't simply conduct a warrantless wiretap and call it a "state secret" to block lawsuits.

http://www.theverge.com/2013/8/1/4580718/fbi-can-remotely-activate-android-and-laptop-microphones-reports-wsj

33 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
FBI can remotely activate Android and laptop microphones, reports WSJ (Original Post) onehandle Aug 2013 OP
I've wondered about that for a long time... damyank913 Aug 2013 #1
I put tape over my cam. nm rhett o rick Aug 2013 #2
Whew. Then I'm not alone eh. damyank913 Aug 2013 #6
No you are not alone. In fact it looks like you have your teddy bear on your lap. rhett o rick Aug 2013 #18
HEY! Don't talk about Teddy... damyank913 Aug 2013 #30
TMI. And please put the cover over your cam. nm rhett o rick Aug 2013 #31
LOL. tridim Aug 2013 #8
IDGI. reformist2 Aug 2013 #10
If the bank was in my living room noamnety Aug 2013 #14
Psst, your phone isn't "recording you" either. tridim Aug 2013 #15
Well, let's say then noamnety Aug 2013 #21
I certainly act differently when I know I am being survielled. rhett o rick Aug 2013 #17
So basically, actual surveillance is a joke to you, while hyperbolic, worst-case, FUD based... tridim Aug 2013 #22
"actual surveillance is a joke to you."? What? How in the world did you get that? rhett o rick Aug 2013 #25
I do, however, find it necessary to adjust my glasses, with my middle finger. niyad Aug 2013 #24
I WILL KICK NOSE-PICKING PANTLESS RHETT O RICK ASS Skittles Aug 2013 #26
If you do, you really wont accomplish much. Just sayin. nm rhett o rick Aug 2013 #27
Me, too. Have done that for years now. closeupready Aug 2013 #19
Get phone with removable battery. Turn OFF, take out battery. hobbit709 Aug 2013 #3
Google started working on it in 06 I believe jakeXT Aug 2013 #4
I think about the people who accused me of being paranoid when I refused to get a tv set that niyad Aug 2013 #5
You're still paranoid. Obviously. tridim Aug 2013 #9
Some people actually care about privacy. Go back to your cartoons. DisgustipatedinCA Aug 2013 #11
The poster's paranoia has exactly nothing to do with my views on privacy issues. tridim Aug 2013 #13
wow, did I hit a nerve or something? pretty sure nobody outside of illinois had heard of him back niyad Aug 2013 #23
I guess your point is that "if you have done nothing wrong, dont worry." Where have I heard that rhett o rick Aug 2013 #32
Or maybe the idea was to build this phone? Egnever Aug 2013 #28
Probably time to install custom ROMs on my Android phone... backscatter712 Aug 2013 #7
And what does everyone do to their desktop PCs so they can chat on Skype? backscatter712 Aug 2013 #12
You can buy software online to do this FarCenter Aug 2013 #16
FBI can also just plant a bug in your house. cbdo2007 Aug 2013 #20
I find this very dificult to believe Egnever Aug 2013 #29
Did they report how long ago this info was on DU? Coyotl Aug 2013 #33

damyank913

(787 posts)
1. I've wondered about that for a long time...
Mon Aug 12, 2013, 11:04 AM
Aug 2013

...there was a teacher in our area that remotely activated the cameras in the laptops issued to his kids. I think this is an easy thing for our tech savvy government. My friends used to laugh at me for putting a hoody over my cam...

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
18. No you are not alone. In fact it looks like you have your teddy bear on your lap.
Mon Aug 12, 2013, 01:50 PM
Aug 2013

Apparently your camera is uncovered. And the teddy bear thing....will be just between us.

damyank913

(787 posts)
30. HEY! Don't talk about Teddy...
Tue Aug 13, 2013, 10:16 AM
Aug 2013

...He's my "special Friend". Besides, because of me he's anatomically correct.

 

noamnety

(20,234 posts)
14. If the bank was in my living room
Mon Aug 12, 2013, 01:20 PM
Aug 2013

recording me in the (falsely presumed) privacy of my own home, I would have a major problem with it.

 

noamnety

(20,234 posts)
21. Well, let's say then
Mon Aug 12, 2013, 02:45 PM
Aug 2013

that if the bank installed software to allow themselves to record me in my home, I would be pissed off. Even if they told me "don't worry, we installed it so we have the capability to film you in your bedroom, but we would never use it. And our operators would never abuse their access. So - you see - nothing to worry about."

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
17. I certainly act differently when I know I am being survielled.
Mon Aug 12, 2013, 01:48 PM
Aug 2013

I dont pick my nose for example. And I do wear pants.

tridim

(45,358 posts)
22. So basically, actual surveillance is a joke to you, while hyperbolic, worst-case, FUD based...
Mon Aug 12, 2013, 02:51 PM
Aug 2013

blame-Obama-first-always surveillance, that doesn't exist, causes you to shit yourself with fear. So much so that you tape up the camera on your phone.

Got it. Nuff said, really.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
25. "actual surveillance is a joke to you."? What? How in the world did you get that?
Tue Aug 13, 2013, 12:09 AM
Aug 2013

I think you know that's no way to present any kind of argument. I believe we need strong security, but I also believe that if we let the ultra-conservatives have carte blanche with tens of billions and with no oversite, we are apt to see a conservative monster created. If history has taught us any thing it's that there are those out there that want nothing more than to control of government at any cost. Maybe the Koch Brothers or the Bush Crime family. We know that during the Bush lost decade the conservatives installed conservatives in every agency in the government. To pretend that in 2008 all these conservatives changed their ideologies to that of the Democratic President is lunacy. Gen Clapper, Gen Alexander, Herr Mueller, and Comey are Bush conservatives. They still have conservative ideologies. They need to be kept under control via oversight.

Do you trust conservatives like Gen Clapper and Gen Alexander?

jakeXT

(10,575 posts)
4. Google started working on it in 06 I believe
Mon Aug 12, 2013, 11:08 AM
Aug 2013

Google developing eavesdropping software

Comment The first thing that came out of our mouths when we heard that Google is working on a system that listens to what's on your TV playing in the background, and then serves you relevant adverts, was "that's cool, but dangerous".

The idea appeared in Technology Review citing Peter Norvig, director of research at Google, who says these ideas will show up eventually in real Google products - sooner rather than later.

The idea is to use the existing PC microphone to listen to whatever is heard in the background, be it music, your phone going off or the TV turned down. The PC then identifies it, using fingerprinting, and then shows you relevant content, whether that's adverts or search results, or a chat room on the subject.

And, of course, we wouldn’t put it past Google to store that information away, along with the search terms it keeps that you've used, and the web pages you have visited, to help it create a personalised profile that feeds you just the right kind of adverts/content. And given that it is trying to develop alternative approaches to TV advertising, it could go the extra step and help send "content relevant" advertising to your TV as well.

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/09/03/google_eavesdropping_software/

niyad

(113,275 posts)
5. I think about the people who accused me of being paranoid when I refused to get a tv set that
Mon Aug 12, 2013, 11:11 AM
Aug 2013

would activate to give you alerts on weather. figured, if they could turn it on to talk to you, they could turn it on to listen to you.

tridim

(45,358 posts)
9. You're still paranoid. Obviously.
Mon Aug 12, 2013, 11:39 AM
Aug 2013

It's a fucking weather alert, not big brother. Listen to yourself.

Just do what Rick-rick-rick did and put tape over your cameras, then that mean old Obama can't spy on you.

tridim

(45,358 posts)
13. The poster's paranoia has exactly nothing to do with my views on privacy issues.
Mon Aug 12, 2013, 11:47 AM
Aug 2013

Are you implying that you have to be paranoid to understand the issue?

If so, no thanks. It's all yours.

niyad

(113,275 posts)
23. wow, did I hit a nerve or something? pretty sure nobody outside of illinois had heard of him back
Mon Aug 12, 2013, 07:20 PM
Aug 2013

then. but you just stay in your nice little cocoon, and stop telling those of us who actually have experience in this area that we are being paranoid.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
32. I guess your point is that "if you have done nothing wrong, dont worry." Where have I heard that
Tue Aug 13, 2013, 11:00 AM
Aug 2013

argument before? From our right-wing friends maybe?

For some, not knowing is bliss.

backscatter712

(26,355 posts)
7. Probably time to install custom ROMs on my Android phone...
Mon Aug 12, 2013, 11:34 AM
Aug 2013

There's always CyanogenMod or Paranoid Android, for example.

backscatter712

(26,355 posts)
12. And what does everyone do to their desktop PCs so they can chat on Skype?
Mon Aug 12, 2013, 11:43 AM
Aug 2013

Oh yeah, they install cameras and microphones.

Laptops have them already built in, as do most desktops.

And schools have already been using them to creeper-peep on children.

 

FarCenter

(19,429 posts)
16. You can buy software online to do this
Mon Aug 12, 2013, 01:40 PM
Aug 2013

It is especially useful for keeping tabs on your kids, spouse, etc .

 

Egnever

(21,506 posts)
29. I find this very dificult to believe
Tue Aug 13, 2013, 03:06 AM
Aug 2013

if theres a phone OS that has been ripped apart down to its last line of code its android. I highly doubt if this was possible it would be the WSJ that was breaking the news.

Dont let that stop the wild ass speculation though.

 

Coyotl

(15,262 posts)
33. Did they report how long ago this info was on DU?
Tue Aug 13, 2013, 11:04 AM
Aug 2013

News is no fun if you provide context--obliterates all the hype.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»FBI can remotely activate...