General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsACLU: How to Process Eric Holder’s Major Criminal Law Reform Speech
By Laura W. Murphy
Attorney General Eric Holder just called mass incarceration a moral and economic failure. He just outlined several major proposals that he says will help to ease major overcrowding in federal prisons. And he just suggested that federal prosecutors should avoid harsh mandatory minimums for certain low-level, non-violent drug offenses.
What should we make of the nations top prosecutor calling out the US for throwing too many people behind bars and challenging the failed war on drugs?
First off, we should acknowledge that this is a big deal! This is the first speech by any Attorney General calling for such massive criminal justice reforms. This is the first major address from the Obama Administration calling for action to end the mass incarceration crisis and reduce the racial disparities that plague our criminal justice system. In the same speech, the Attorney General committed to take on the school-to-prison pipeline and called on Congress to end the forced budget cuts that have decimated public defenders nationwide. This is great news.
The ACLU can proudly say that it has been deeply engaged in policy discussions with this administration, and Democrats and Republicans in Congress. Many of the reforms that we have long championed made it into the Attorney Generals speech, including:
- Developing guidelines to file fewer cases
- Directing a group of U.S. Attorneys to examine sentencing disparities and develop recommendations to address them
- Directing every U.S. Attorney to designate a Prevention and Reentry Coordinator
- Directing every DOJ component to consider whether regulations have collateral consequences that impair reentry
- Reducing mandatory minimum charging for low-level drug offenses
- Expanding eligibility for compassionate release; and
- Identifying and sharing best practices for diversion programs
- Calling into question zero tolerance policies and other policies that lead to the school to prison pipeline
- Challenging the legal community to make the promise of Gideon (right to counsel) more of a reality
- more -
http://www.aclu.org/blog/criminal-law-reform-racial-justice/how-process-eric-holders-major-criminal-law-reform-speech
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)It certainly does sound positive, and maybe a major step toward the necessary final state of decriminalization and treating addictions in a harm-reduction-based public health model.
villager
(26,001 posts)It does seem like a dare-we-say substantial move in the right direction on these issues...
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)The DEA itself, lots of local LE who have gotten hooked on money from property seizures, the private prison industry, the prison-labor industry, the guards unions in the public prisons--
You might be surprised at what comes crawling out from the Dark Realms to defend our current Draconian drug laws.
villager
(26,001 posts)because you are right, too much easy rip-off money for the "authorities" to be made, with the current set of "laws..."
immoderate
(20,885 posts)...maybe not.
--imm
ProSense
(116,464 posts)"In twenty or thirty years we may see some reforms, or...maybe not. "
...the Fair Sentencing Act was signed in 2010, and it's already working.
NYT editorial: Sentencing Reform Starts to Pay Off
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023393947
indepat
(20,899 posts)on this issue.
tridim
(45,358 posts)Prisons don't deal with justice, just locking lots of people in cages.
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)of bought politicians.
Surely you don't expect "justice" to triumph over greed.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)bigtree
(85,987 posts)Holder is calling for a change in Justice Department policies to reserve the most severe penalties for drug offenses for serious, high-level or violent drug traffickers. He has directed his 94 U.S. attorneys across the country to develop specific, locally tailored guidelines for determining when federal charges should be filed and when they should not.
The attorney general can make some changes to drug policy on his own. He is giving new instructions to federal prosecutors on how they should write their criminal complaints when charging low-level drug offenders, to avoid triggering the mandatory minimum sentences . . .
Holder said he has also revised the departments prison policy to allow for more compassionate releases of elderly inmates who did not commit violent crimes, have served significant portions of their sentences and pose no threat to the public.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/holder-seeks-to-avert-mandatory-minimum-sentences-for-some-low-level-drug-offenders/2013/08/11/343850c2-012c-11e3-96a8-d3b921c0924a_story.html
indepat
(20,899 posts)violent crimes even in prison? What kind of society willy-nilly incarcerates the elderly?
bigtree
(85,987 posts)"The ACLU can proudly say that it has been deeply engaged in policy discussions with this administration, and Democrats and Republicans in Congress. Many of the reforms that we have long championed made it into the Attorney Generals speech . . ."
ProSense
(116,464 posts)spanone
(135,826 posts)Scurrilous
(38,687 posts)Cha
(297,154 posts)People with criminal convictions have for too long been excluded from the economy. We should support Holder in calling for reforms to help people leaving the system, such as federal reentry coordinators and fewer collateral consequences facing people with criminal convictions (which would, in turn, make it easier for people with criminal convictions to obtain employment and housing).
Thanks ProSense
HardTimes99
(2,049 posts)incarceration policies?
I ask b/c Schwarzenegger took a run at the California Prison-Industrial Complex (the prison guards union) and got soundly rebuked for it. There's a lesson in there that bears heeding.
DainBramaged
(39,191 posts)prison pipeline ."
'bout time.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)Thanks.