Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHow NSA surveillance endangers the Fourth Amendment
Sorry, this may not be of interest to those posters furiously dragging the internet for personal attacks on the whisteleblower, Snowden, who brought this to the public's attention so I apologize for the "dry" nature of this OP.----------------------------------------------------------------
http://news.yahoo.com/nsa-surveillance-endangers-fourth-amendment-100208289.html
Jonathan Hafetz from Seton Hall Law School, in a commentary, says the NSAs surveillance programs undermine Fourth Amendment protections and they could affect the conduct of ordinary citizens.
The New York Times has reported that the National Security Agency (NSA) is combing through vast amounts of Americans email and text communications into and out of the country. This latest revelationpart of the continuing fallout from the disclosures of government documents by former NSA contractor Edward J. Snowdenunderscores the frayed fabric of the Constitutions Fourth Amendment and the threat to the values it protects.
We already knew that the government was sweeping up international communications of American citizens under the FISA Amendments Act of 2008 (FAA). While the FAA authorizes the government to target foreigners abroad, it also permits the government to collect Americans communications with those foreign targets, as well as to retain and disseminate that information to other government agencies and foreign governments.
The Times story, however, makes clear that the NSA is also acquiringwithout a warrantthe communications of any foreigner about the target, once a target has been identified, thus sweeping in an even wider range of communications by U.S. citizens than previously believed.
The Fourth Amendment provides a bulwark against this type of dragnet surveillance. Before searching Americans private communications, the Fourth Amendment requires that the government demonstrate probable cause or individualized suspicion.
The NSAs widespread, suspicionless surveillance of Americans private communications will not only impact the work of journalists, lawyers, and others who frequently communicate with people abroad. It will also affect the conduct of ordinary citizens, now fearful of visiting a controversial website or discussing a particular topic via email.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
8 replies, 1070 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (8)
ReplyReply to this post
8 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How NSA surveillance endangers the Fourth Amendment (Original Post)
Bonobo
Aug 2013
OP
Socal31
(2,484 posts)1. "How a drought may endanger water levels"
"How a nuclear war may endanger life on earth"
"How injecting Heroin and Coke at the same time while car-surfing may endanger your health"
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)2. By simply existing they defy the 4th .
pscot
(21,024 posts)3. The Patriot act endangers the 1st, the 4th, the 5th
and probably a bunch more.
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)7. It should never have been passed!
hootinholler
(26,449 posts)5. Rec for the opening paragraph!
Shame I can't get another for the article.
nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)6. +1
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)8. you just have to look at the votes on the FISA Ammendments Act of 2008