Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

madokie

(51,076 posts)
Wed Aug 14, 2013, 07:57 AM Aug 2013

Who’s afraid of a little sodomy? Mark Morford

There is something a little sad, if not enormously disturbing, about people like Ken Cuccinelli, the intensely troubled AG of Virginia and one-man Tea Party sideshow who is currently running for governor and who, if he has his way, will hereby outlaw sodomy and oral sex. For everyone. Forevermore.

Something desperate. Something lost. Something demented and strange, like rolling around on broken glass, like slapping yourself in the face with a furious eel, like openly molesting a bunch of baby asparagus. That’s Ken for you.

Have you heard? Virginia’s deepest embarrassment is making national news, again, for out-Rick Santoruming the legend himself.

Yes, Ken Cuccinelli is apparently so disgusted by human sexuality that he is trying to circumvent the Supreme Court’s own 2003 sodomy ruling and reinstate Crimes Against Nature legislation that makes both oral and anal sex a Class 6 felony, so he may freely arrest anyone – married, single, gay or straight – who wishes to indulge in either of these ancient and time-honored, God-blessed, Greek-sanctioned sexual acts the likes of which, along with whisky, puppies, yoga, Black Sabbath reunions and ecstatic dendrology, help make life worth living.

The rest: http://blog.sfgate.com/morford/2013/08/13/whos-afraid-of-a-little-sodomy/

15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Who’s afraid of a little sodomy? Mark Morford (Original Post) madokie Aug 2013 OP
Very much worth reading in its entirety theHandpuppet Aug 2013 #1
In my opinion madokie Aug 2013 #3
+1,000 malaise Aug 2013 #5
I've always felt psychological profiles should be established as a requirement for RKP5637 Aug 2013 #2
Virginia is not for lovers. nashville_brook Aug 2013 #4
virginia is for lovers BillStein Aug 2013 #8
And only with the intent to procreate theHandpuppet Aug 2013 #10
rec for the title alone. marble falls Aug 2013 #6
Puritanism... awoke_in_2003 Aug 2013 #7
Excellent, well said commentary on the teabaggers and Cuccinelli.. mountain grammy Aug 2013 #9
k and r--mark nails it, as always niyad Aug 2013 #11
"The Cooch's" interest in all of the mechanics of gay sex makes me wonder .... Botany Aug 2013 #12
And sometimes a heterosexual bigot... theHandpuppet Aug 2013 #13
Cuccinelli had better specify the form of punishment dickthegrouch Aug 2013 #14
I've been reading in to this a bit more Xyzse Aug 2013 #15

malaise

(268,949 posts)
5. +1,000
Wed Aug 14, 2013, 09:23 AM
Aug 2013

Something is really missing in one's life when he feels his/her views supersede an individual's right to choose. That is arrogance on steroids.

RKP5637

(67,104 posts)
2. I've always felt psychological profiles should be established as a requirement for
Wed Aug 14, 2013, 08:05 AM
Aug 2013

certain levels of office. What a cat fight that would be to establish them, but I think it's very naive to believe bizarre personality aspects will be revealed simply in the campaigning process.

theHandpuppet

(19,964 posts)
10. And only with the intent to procreate
Wed Aug 14, 2013, 10:13 AM
Aug 2013

Not allowed to dance in the garden of earthly delights without planting a turnip!

mountain grammy

(26,619 posts)
9. Excellent, well said commentary on the teabaggers and Cuccinelli..
Wed Aug 14, 2013, 10:12 AM
Aug 2013

At some point, someone decided to market "Virginia is for lovers." What a cruel joke that is now with this weirdo running for governor. If he's not soundly rejected by the voters, the world will know: Virginia is for haters.

Botany

(70,496 posts)
12. "The Cooch's" interest in all of the mechanics of gay sex makes me wonder ....
Wed Aug 14, 2013, 10:36 AM
Aug 2013

.... just when will he be caught outside of some gay night club or trolling
for sex in some public park?

dickthegrouch

(3,172 posts)
14. Cuccinelli had better specify the form of punishment
Wed Aug 14, 2013, 01:59 PM
Aug 2013

A whole lot of sodomy occurs in prisons (Whether sanctioned or not, and whether consensual or not).

Therefore the punishment for transgression is going to have to be something that doesn't make the incidence of the "crime" higher.

Xyzse

(8,217 posts)
15. I've been reading in to this a bit more
Wed Aug 14, 2013, 02:04 PM
Aug 2013

Thing is, the reason they kept that is that it is a felony, and can be used to add time and punishment for sex offenders.

Those they could not get for anything more, since the sentences of some sex offenders are more like a slap on the wrist.

However, I think it is completely idiotic, and they should re-word that law to implicity state that this is only in cases of sex offenders and molesters.

I don't agree with the law at all, but I can see why they kept it, to lengthen sentences of sex offenders and molesters who get misdemeanor charges instead of a felony. Breaking that law is considered a felony which carries stiffer penalties.

I am not excusing the stupidity of Cuccinelli, but I must for the sake of balance mention what that particular law is being used for.

I still think they should change it.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Who’s afraid of a little ...