General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWho’s afraid of a little sodomy? Mark Morford
There is something a little sad, if not enormously disturbing, about people like Ken Cuccinelli, the intensely troubled AG of Virginia and one-man Tea Party sideshow who is currently running for governor and who, if he has his way, will hereby outlaw sodomy and oral sex. For everyone. Forevermore.
Something desperate. Something lost. Something demented and strange, like rolling around on broken glass, like slapping yourself in the face with a furious eel, like openly molesting a bunch of baby asparagus. Thats Ken for you.
Have you heard? Virginias deepest embarrassment is making national news, again, for out-Rick Santoruming the legend himself.
Yes, Ken Cuccinelli is apparently so disgusted by human sexuality that he is trying to circumvent the Supreme Courts own 2003 sodomy ruling and reinstate Crimes Against Nature legislation that makes both oral and anal sex a Class 6 felony, so he may freely arrest anyone married, single, gay or straight who wishes to indulge in either of these ancient and time-honored, God-blessed, Greek-sanctioned sexual acts the likes of which, along with whisky, puppies, yoga, Black Sabbath reunions and ecstatic dendrology, help make life worth living.
The rest: http://blog.sfgate.com/morford/2013/08/13/whos-afraid-of-a-little-sodomy/
theHandpuppet
(19,964 posts)A zinger of a commentary.
madokie
(51,076 posts)Morford is always worth reading. The man has a way with words
Something is really missing in one's life when he feels his/her views supersede an individual's right to choose. That is arrogance on steroids.
RKP5637
(67,104 posts)certain levels of office. What a cat fight that would be to establish them, but I think it's very naive to believe bizarre personality aspects will be revealed simply in the campaigning process.
nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)BillStein
(758 posts)as long as they are married xians who only use the missionary position
theHandpuppet
(19,964 posts)Not allowed to dance in the garden of earthly delights without planting a turnip!
marble falls
(57,077 posts)awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)The irrational fear that someone, somewhere, is having a good time.
mountain grammy
(26,619 posts)At some point, someone decided to market "Virginia is for lovers." What a cruel joke that is now with this weirdo running for governor. If he's not soundly rejected by the voters, the world will know: Virginia is for haters.
niyad
(113,265 posts)Botany
(70,496 posts).... just when will he be caught outside of some gay night club or trolling
for sex in some public park?
theHandpuppet
(19,964 posts)... is just a heterosexual bigot.
dickthegrouch
(3,172 posts)A whole lot of sodomy occurs in prisons (Whether sanctioned or not, and whether consensual or not).
Therefore the punishment for transgression is going to have to be something that doesn't make the incidence of the "crime" higher.
Xyzse
(8,217 posts)Thing is, the reason they kept that is that it is a felony, and can be used to add time and punishment for sex offenders.
Those they could not get for anything more, since the sentences of some sex offenders are more like a slap on the wrist.
However, I think it is completely idiotic, and they should re-word that law to implicity state that this is only in cases of sex offenders and molesters.
I don't agree with the law at all, but I can see why they kept it, to lengthen sentences of sex offenders and molesters who get misdemeanor charges instead of a felony. Breaking that law is considered a felony which carries stiffer penalties.
I am not excusing the stupidity of Cuccinelli, but I must for the sake of balance mention what that particular law is being used for.
I still think they should change it.