General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHaving a clear moral sense of the Egyptian situation...
requires over-looking one or another parts of the picture.
The reason the Obama administration cannot seem to handle the Egyptian situation clearly is that there is no clear way to handle it.
The situation is equivalent to the KKK or Tea Party getting elected and then, once in office, setting the Constitution aside and installing itself up as a dictatorship, and then being ousted by the military, which installs itself as a dictatorship.
Anyone who is "clear-minded" in this situation is shirking the burden of cognitive dissonance.
The deposed government posed as great a threat to whatever we liberal types stand for as the current coup government does.
I doubt the Egyptian left (I think most American liberal Democrats would be on the left in the Egyptian political spectrum) are fans of the coup, nor are the Egyptian left hankering for the reinstallation of Mursi as a right-wing dictator.
quinnox
(20,600 posts)I have had it up to here of our country meddling and getting involved in other nations and their internal conflicts. We don't need to control the whole world, or everything that happens in it.
The Magistrate
(95,247 posts)Short and sweet and covers all the bases.
pennylane100
(3,425 posts)Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)blm
(113,057 posts)It was completely closed by the end of 2012. Now, there are so many different layers of bad characters that the good guys are scarce and difficult to identify.
Pretzel_Warrior
(8,361 posts)blm
(113,057 posts).
Pretzel_Warrior
(8,361 posts)to ensure they don't create more violence and terrorism in Syria and surrounding countries.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)None of that sounds like a good plan. Staying the hell out of it sounds sensible to me.
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)blm
(113,057 posts).
Aerows
(39,961 posts)we'd be siding with either a hungry alligator or an angry crocodile. Getting in the middle of that is asking to get shredded.
cali
(114,904 posts)of the massacres of hundreds of unarmed protesters in the sit ins yesterday.
And you are quite wrong about Egyptian liberals who overwhelmingly supported the coup. Read Cole, Murphy, Feldman and Engel for more information, context and analysis.
cthulu2016
(10,960 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)and it's a very salient piece of the puzzle.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)damned if you don't all the way around.
MADem
(135,425 posts)We can offer friendly advice, as can other regional actors, who should also be the ones to offer any sort of negotiating teams, if they ever come into the equation, but this is one we need to stay the hell away from, beyond making sympathetic noises that wish the "Egyptian people" the very best and a "swift resolution" to their domestic turmoil..
We don't have a leg to stand on here. Supporting "democracy" in this case means supporting a nutjob who is destroying the Egyptian economy and discriminating against women and minorities in a very brutal way. Supporting "coup" or "revolution" goes against our 'democratic' grain. Best bet? Leave them to sort it out--they're an ancient culture, not stupid by a long stretch, they can manage without us.
I hope Al-Sisi does establish a timeline for elections and that this "reset" works. If he does that soon enough, and they get back on a path towards something that is "sufficiently democratic," at least for that neck of the woods, we need to go with the flow.
Donald Ian Rankin
(13,598 posts)Morsi was an appalling autocrat who clearly believed in the tyranny of the majority, but he hadn't set he constitution aside or made himself a dictator.
It's possibly also worth noting that while the situation is morally ambiguous, it's legally unambiguous - the Obama administration has a black-and-white legal obligation to stop all aid to Egypt immediately. Of course, doing that might well lead to it invading Israel, so arguably ignoring that law is the right call (I think it *probably* isn't, but I'm far from confident of that), but moral justification doesn't make doing so any less illegal.
Skidmore
(37,364 posts)Nor should we be picking teams. Look for the neocons to crawl out from under their logs for this one though. They and everyone like them who seem to think that democracy can be spread at gunpoint will continue to be wrong. You may get an election for a people but you ultimately must live with the outcomes whether you like them or not.
X_Digger
(18,585 posts)David__77
(23,384 posts)Others are silent because they do have mixed feelings, but they certainly won't speak out against it.
I generally agree with your characterization.