Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cthulu2016

(10,960 posts)
Thu Aug 15, 2013, 01:13 PM Aug 2013

Having a clear moral sense of the Egyptian situation...

requires over-looking one or another parts of the picture.

The reason the Obama administration cannot seem to handle the Egyptian situation clearly is that there is no clear way to handle it.

The situation is equivalent to the KKK or Tea Party getting elected and then, once in office, setting the Constitution aside and installing itself up as a dictatorship, and then being ousted by the military, which installs itself as a dictatorship.

Anyone who is "clear-minded" in this situation is shirking the burden of cognitive dissonance.

The deposed government posed as great a threat to whatever we liberal types stand for as the current coup government does.

I doubt the Egyptian left (I think most American liberal Democrats would be on the left in the Egyptian political spectrum) are fans of the coup, nor are the Egyptian left hankering for the reinstallation of Mursi as a right-wing dictator.

21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Having a clear moral sense of the Egyptian situation... (Original Post) cthulu2016 Aug 2013 OP
Interesting take. My own take is its none of our business quinnox Aug 2013 #1
That, Sir, Is A Pretty Clear-Minded View The Magistrate Aug 2013 #2
That seems like a good take on the situation. pennylane100 Aug 2013 #3
What difference does it make to the dead, the orphans and the homeless, whether the mad Tierra_y_Libertad Aug 2013 #4
Same with Syria. The window of time to deal with Syria was 2008-2011. blm Aug 2013 #5
I disagree. Pretzel_Warrior Aug 2013 #6
In what way do you think the US can change the situation in Syria at this point? blm Aug 2013 #10
help rebels topple Assad and then clean up the rebels by weeding out terrorist groups Pretzel_Warrior Aug 2013 #11
While you arm Al-Qaeda Aerows Aug 2013 #14
You're funny. Comrade Grumpy Aug 2013 #17
That sounds like the road to war to me. blm Aug 2013 #21
It seems to me like Aerows Aug 2013 #12
that may or may not be true of the situation overall. it is decidedly not true cali Aug 2013 #7
I understated liberal coup support to avoid tangential contentiousness cthulu2016 Aug 2013 #9
you misstated it- no offense. cali Aug 2013 #13
Seems like damned if you do Aerows Aug 2013 #8
The Egyptians need to sort this out on their own. MADem Aug 2013 #15
I think that's mostly accurate, apart from the dictatorship part. Donald Ian Rankin Aug 2013 #16
This fight is not ours to decide. Skidmore Aug 2013 #18
There are no 'good guys' in this story. n/t X_Digger Aug 2013 #19
Actually, significant parts of the Egyptian left supported and support the coup. David__77 Aug 2013 #20
 

quinnox

(20,600 posts)
1. Interesting take. My own take is its none of our business
Thu Aug 15, 2013, 01:16 PM
Aug 2013

I have had it up to here of our country meddling and getting involved in other nations and their internal conflicts. We don't need to control the whole world, or everything that happens in it.

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
4. What difference does it make to the dead, the orphans and the homeless, whether the mad
Thu Aug 15, 2013, 01:25 PM
Aug 2013
What difference does it make to the dead, the orphans and the homeless, whether the mad destruction is wrought under the name of totalitarianism or the holy name of liberty or democracy? Gandhi

blm

(113,057 posts)
5. Same with Syria. The window of time to deal with Syria was 2008-2011.
Thu Aug 15, 2013, 01:26 PM
Aug 2013

It was completely closed by the end of 2012. Now, there are so many different layers of bad characters that the good guys are scarce and difficult to identify.

 

Pretzel_Warrior

(8,361 posts)
11. help rebels topple Assad and then clean up the rebels by weeding out terrorist groups
Thu Aug 15, 2013, 01:32 PM
Aug 2013

to ensure they don't create more violence and terrorism in Syria and surrounding countries.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
14. While you arm Al-Qaeda
Thu Aug 15, 2013, 01:34 PM
Aug 2013

None of that sounds like a good plan. Staying the hell out of it sounds sensible to me.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
12. It seems to me like
Thu Aug 15, 2013, 01:32 PM
Aug 2013

we'd be siding with either a hungry alligator or an angry crocodile. Getting in the middle of that is asking to get shredded.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
7. that may or may not be true of the situation overall. it is decidedly not true
Thu Aug 15, 2013, 01:29 PM
Aug 2013

of the massacres of hundreds of unarmed protesters in the sit ins yesterday.

And you are quite wrong about Egyptian liberals who overwhelmingly supported the coup. Read Cole, Murphy, Feldman and Engel for more information, context and analysis.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
15. The Egyptians need to sort this out on their own.
Thu Aug 15, 2013, 01:34 PM
Aug 2013

We can offer friendly advice, as can other regional actors, who should also be the ones to offer any sort of negotiating teams, if they ever come into the equation, but this is one we need to stay the hell away from, beyond making sympathetic noises that wish the "Egyptian people" the very best and a "swift resolution" to their domestic turmoil..

We don't have a leg to stand on here. Supporting "democracy" in this case means supporting a nutjob who is destroying the Egyptian economy and discriminating against women and minorities in a very brutal way. Supporting "coup" or "revolution" goes against our 'democratic' grain. Best bet? Leave them to sort it out--they're an ancient culture, not stupid by a long stretch, they can manage without us.

I hope Al-Sisi does establish a timeline for elections and that this "reset" works. If he does that soon enough, and they get back on a path towards something that is "sufficiently democratic," at least for that neck of the woods, we need to go with the flow.

Donald Ian Rankin

(13,598 posts)
16. I think that's mostly accurate, apart from the dictatorship part.
Thu Aug 15, 2013, 01:40 PM
Aug 2013

Morsi was an appalling autocrat who clearly believed in the tyranny of the majority, but he hadn't set he constitution aside or made himself a dictator.

It's possibly also worth noting that while the situation is morally ambiguous, it's legally unambiguous - the Obama administration has a black-and-white legal obligation to stop all aid to Egypt immediately. Of course, doing that might well lead to it invading Israel, so arguably ignoring that law is the right call (I think it *probably* isn't, but I'm far from confident of that), but moral justification doesn't make doing so any less illegal.

Skidmore

(37,364 posts)
18. This fight is not ours to decide.
Thu Aug 15, 2013, 01:45 PM
Aug 2013

Nor should we be picking teams. Look for the neocons to crawl out from under their logs for this one though. They and everyone like them who seem to think that democracy can be spread at gunpoint will continue to be wrong. You may get an election for a people but you ultimately must live with the outcomes whether you like them or not.

David__77

(23,384 posts)
20. Actually, significant parts of the Egyptian left supported and support the coup.
Thu Aug 15, 2013, 02:17 PM
Aug 2013

Others are silent because they do have mixed feelings, but they certainly won't speak out against it.

I generally agree with your characterization.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Having a clear moral sens...