Going Outside The Bubble
Going back to the idea of having shock jocks and other friendly outlets host the Republican debates, it's instructive to see what Mr. Limbaugh has to say about it.
Put together your own debates with your own moderators, whoever you want, and focus on real Republican issues in these debates rather than whether theyre going to do a Hillary Clinton miniseries or not, Limbaugh said on his show last week. In this current modern age, theres no reason anymore to treat these mainstream media people as mainstream objective and non-aligned reporters.
Without offering evidence, he speculated that ABCs George Stephanopoulos coordinated with the Obama campaign to ask Romney about contraception during a primary debate so they could create the war on women narrative.
Wherever you go outside of Fox, you are going up against the Democrat Party with people disguised as journalists, said Limbaugh. Why do it?
Why is it that whenever the Republicans appear anywhere other than on hate radio or Fox News they feel like they're not getting a fair shake?
It's because anything outside of The Bubble feels unfamiliar and unsafe. People don't nod in agreement when you say crazy, unsubstantiated things. They don't swallow misleading or inaccurate statistics. They push back against demonstrable lies. They have a different, more accurate version of history. Sometimes, this makes you look dishonest, or even stupid.
Who wants to look dishonest and stupid? Who wants to feel dishonest and stupid?
Everything inside The Bubble is protected, padded, safe, and soft. Unlike Democrats, Republican lawmakers don't have to worry about some Rachel Maddow figure querying them about drone strikes, the NSA, the treatment of Bradley Manning, or the prison at Guantanamo Bay. Adversarial journalism is almost non-existent inside the Bubble, except to enforce adherence to Borg orthodoxy.
http://www.boomantribune.com/story/2013/8/16/11182/9999