Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kpete

(71,979 posts)
Fri Aug 16, 2013, 05:45 PM Aug 2013

White House Tried To Interfere With Washington Post's Report, And To Change Quotes From NSA

White House Tried To Interfere With Washington Post's Report, And To Change Quotes From NSA

Among the many, many incredible revelations from the Washington Post report on the abuses by the NSA is a tidbit about an interview that the Post was able to do with the NSA's director of compliance, John DeLong, followed by the White House's attempt to completely whitewash the interview and block his quotes from being used, despite the Post being told otherwise initially:

The Obama administration referred all questions for this article to John DeLong, the NSA’s director of compliance, who answered questions freely in a 90-minute interview. DeLong and members of the NSA communications staff said he could be quoted “by name and title” on some of his answers after an unspecified internal review. The Post said it would not permit the editing of quotes. Two days later, White House and NSA spokesmen said that none of DeLong’s comments could be quoted on the record and sent instead a prepared statement in his name. The Post declines to accept the substitute language as quotations from DeLong.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/nsa-statements-to-the-post/2013/08/15/f40dd2c4-05d6-11e3-a07f-49ddc7417125_story.html

Read that again. This is the same White House that has been saying that they want to be as transparent as possible and to rebuild trust. And yet, here they are trying to block the Post from using an interview -- an interview they suggested in the first place -- and then to replace it with a bland and bogus "statement."

http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130816/01314924200/white-house-tried-to-interfere-with-washington-posts-report-to-change-quotes-nsa.shtml
33 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
White House Tried To Interfere With Washington Post's Report, And To Change Quotes From NSA (Original Post) kpete Aug 2013 OP
It's all getting so ridiculous. Autumn Aug 2013 #1
It's getting desperate. nt bemildred Aug 2013 #3
very nixonian to do this kind of crap roguevalley Aug 2013 #8
If you care to look, the lies are transparent. Eddie Haskell Aug 2013 #2
NDAA: It is legal for the government to lie to your face. Fire Walk With Me Aug 2013 #4
What they say...vs...What they do. bvar22 Aug 2013 #5
Government tries to spin every story, not sure why people expect otherwise, nt geek tragedy Aug 2013 #6
Shall we lower the bar for them some more? Hydra Aug 2013 #10
Big difference between spin and active cover-up,. "least untruthful" indeed. Civilization2 Aug 2013 #13
Lies, lies, manipulation, intimidation, and more lies. woo me with science Aug 2013 #7
The repubs wanted their scandal and now they may have it. last1standing Aug 2013 #9
Not likely Hydra Aug 2013 #11
Obamacare was substantially written by the Heritage Foundation. last1standing Aug 2013 #12
They don't object to Obamacare Hydra Aug 2013 #24
I personally Tiredofthesame Aug 2013 #14
Welcome to DU! Hydra Aug 2013 #27
Good point. I'll skip the wager. Haha Tiredofthesame Aug 2013 #32
The fact that our Democratic president is betraying all of us is much worse FiveGoodMen Aug 2013 #19
I can't disagree with that. last1standing Aug 2013 #25
remember when you voted for change? Doctor_J Aug 2013 #15
Apparently lost... no1uno Aug 2013 #16
Facts are stubborn things. WilliamPitt Aug 2013 #17
It appears that only thing that has crossed over is our President LondonReign2 Aug 2013 #20
Of course AgingAmerican Aug 2013 #23
But wait, East Coast Pirate Aug 2013 #18
I had high hopes in 08 Chuuku Davis Aug 2013 #21
I can't believe BobbyBoring Aug 2013 #22
is this 1awake Aug 2013 #26
Actually, some surprising breaks in ranks the last few weeks Hydra Aug 2013 #28
All ten of her? last1standing Aug 2013 #29
I may need a break for a bit, 1awake Aug 2013 #30
I didn't have much hope Hydra Aug 2013 #33
When First We Practice To Deceive - Oh The Wicked Web We Weave cantbeserious Aug 2013 #31
 

Fire Walk With Me

(38,893 posts)
4. NDAA: It is legal for the government to lie to your face.
Fri Aug 16, 2013, 06:14 PM
Aug 2013
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023438872

So much for "transparency and the rule of law will be the touchstones of this administration."

Good intentional mockery, though.

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
5. What they say...vs...What they do.
Fri Aug 16, 2013, 06:18 PM
Aug 2013

Two different worlds.



You will know them by their [font size=3]WORKS,[/font]
not by their speeches, promises, or excuses.

 

Civilization2

(649 posts)
13. Big difference between spin and active cover-up,. "least untruthful" indeed.
Fri Aug 16, 2013, 07:43 PM
Aug 2013

free and open society, a democracy,. is that what we see???

last1standing

(11,709 posts)
9. The repubs wanted their scandal and now they may have it.
Fri Aug 16, 2013, 07:28 PM
Aug 2013

Five years of bullshit faux scandals couldn't take Obama down, but if he doesn't change course and denounce these actions, this one real scandal may just do it.

Hydra

(14,459 posts)
11. Not likely
Fri Aug 16, 2013, 07:36 PM
Aug 2013

This is a Republican program the President is protecting. More than half backed him up on the Amash/Conyers amendment, which would have been a good time to shove a knife in his back.

They'd rather it be a blowjob or something equally embarrassing. Maybe being President while Black.

last1standing

(11,709 posts)
12. Obamacare was substantially written by the Heritage Foundation.
Fri Aug 16, 2013, 07:42 PM
Aug 2013

And don't forget that Amash is an extreme right winger.

The repubs don't care who's program it is, they just want to bring down the Democratic president. Just like they're willing to call a right wing insurance program "socialist," they'll have no problem calling a right wing domestic spy program "1984 redux." This isn't about ideology, it's about power and I believe the repubs are seeing a soft spot.

Hydra

(14,459 posts)
24. They don't object to Obamacare
Fri Aug 16, 2013, 08:09 PM
Aug 2013

They just loved that he put their program in place, and they get to take credit for voting against it if it fails. Why the President thought he could reach a happy little consensus with a bunch of snakes is beyond me.

Regarding Amash, there are some Republicans that don't agree with Constitutional shredding. The fact that it's a Dem doing it makes it easier, just as if it were a Repub in the WH we'd have an easier time of it on our side.

The MIC Repubs will quietly work to shore up the President on this. After all, it's their powers they are defending. Clapper certainly isn't a Dem, and the next President is unlikely to be one either.

Hydra

(14,459 posts)
27. Welcome to DU!
Fri Aug 16, 2013, 08:12 PM
Aug 2013

And friendly bet- the Repubs main party has had plenty of chances to bite the President on this issue, and the usual blowhards are surprisingly quiet.

They want this program in place for the next Bush. Impeachment for real crimes is a dangerous precedent- needs to be a blowjob or a pocket full of skittles.

FiveGoodMen

(20,018 posts)
19. The fact that our Democratic president is betraying all of us is much worse
Fri Aug 16, 2013, 07:56 PM
Aug 2013

than the fact that it may help the GOP betray us next.

1awake

(1,494 posts)
26. is this
Fri Aug 16, 2013, 08:11 PM
Aug 2013
IS this the last straw???????


Ha ha ha ha ha ha. Sorry, not laughing at you, just that will never happen.

Hydra

(14,459 posts)
28. Actually, some surprising breaks in ranks the last few weeks
Fri Aug 16, 2013, 08:14 PM
Aug 2013

It may come down to the queen of them all holding the line by herself, though.

1awake

(1,494 posts)
30. I may need a break for a bit,
Fri Aug 16, 2013, 08:20 PM
Aug 2013

The people that are touting "that" line here... I would be banned if I ever posted what I think about them. I expect it from Right wingers but.... doesn't matter. I hope your right, truly.

Hydra

(14,459 posts)
33. I didn't have much hope
Fri Aug 16, 2013, 10:09 PM
Aug 2013

But I popped into one of the threads of someone I should have had on my ignore list since day one...and he'd seen the light! After I got done picking my jaw off the floor, I decided that everyone can change except the ones who are directly benefiting from it.

Restored my faith in the common man, it did

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»White House Tried To Inte...