Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

G_j

(40,367 posts)
Sun Aug 18, 2013, 11:21 PM Aug 2013

only one in 2,000 people detained are kept for more than six hours.

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/aug/18/glenn-greenwald-guardian-partner-detained-heathrow


Sunday 18 August 2013 19.33 EDT

Glenn Greenwald's partner detained at Heathrow airport for nine hours
David Miranda, partner of Guardian interviewer of whistleblower Edward Snowden, questioned under Terrorism Act

---

David Miranda, who lives with Glenn Greenwald, was returning from a trip to Berlin when he was stopped by officers at 8.05am and informed that he was to be questioned under schedule 7 of the Terrorism Act 2000. The controversial law, which applies only at airports, ports and border areas, allows officers to stop, search, question and detain individuals.

The 28-year-old was held for nine hours, the maximum the law allows before officers must release or formally arrest the individual. According to official figures, most examinations under schedule 7 – over 97% – last less than an hour, and only one in 2,000 people detained are kept for more than six hours.]/b]

Miranda was released, but officials confiscated electronics equipment including his mobile phone, laptop, camera, memory sticks, DVDs and games consoles.
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
only one in 2,000 people detained are kept for more than six hours. (Original Post) G_j Aug 2013 OP
how many in those 2000 Egnever Aug 2013 #1
So "access" warrants detention? ForgoTheConsequence Aug 2013 #2
Funny how these after the fact justifications seem to be rolling forward, isn't it? Scootaloo Aug 2013 #3
I guess we just make up laws as we go along now. ForgoTheConsequence Aug 2013 #5
And I guess you live in a fantasy land where there are no secrets Egnever Aug 2013 #8
I didn't say that. ForgoTheConsequence Aug 2013 #9
Absofrickenlutley Egnever Aug 2013 #6
What access? Downwinder Aug 2013 #4
Are you kidding me? Egnever Aug 2013 #7
I see, the problem was meeting with G_j Aug 2013 #10
A filmaker working on the release of stolen classified documents Egnever Aug 2013 #11
 

Egnever

(21,506 posts)
1. how many in those 2000
Sun Aug 18, 2013, 11:23 PM
Aug 2013

have access to stolen classified intelligence documents?

Get back to me with that number.


ForgoTheConsequence

(4,868 posts)
5. I guess we just make up laws as we go along now.
Sun Aug 18, 2013, 11:31 PM
Aug 2013

Its now illegal to travel if you have possibly had access to classified materials.

 

Egnever

(21,506 posts)
8. And I guess you live in a fantasy land where there are no secrets
Sun Aug 18, 2013, 11:41 PM
Aug 2013

And there are no laws concerning stealing them.

 

Egnever

(21,506 posts)
6. Absofrickenlutley
Sun Aug 18, 2013, 11:37 PM
Aug 2013

You think people who are known to have access to stolen government intell should be allowed to roam freely with no questions asked?

You have no idea whats in those documents some of that info could be devastating to US intel on foreign threats. In fact GG and Snowden themselves have suggested it is. Yet you have absolutely no problem with these bozos traipsing it all over the world.

Is there never anything the american government is allowed to do to gather intel that you wouldnt be willing to share with our adversaries?


 

Egnever

(21,506 posts)
7. Are you kidding me?
Sun Aug 18, 2013, 11:39 PM
Aug 2013

From the story all this nonsense is based on.

While in Berlin, Miranda had visited Laura Poitras, the US film-maker who has also been working on the Snowden files with Greenwald and the Guardian. The Guardian paid for Miranda's flights

Yea he has no involvement whatsoever...

G_j

(40,367 posts)
10. I see, the problem was meeting with
Sun Aug 18, 2013, 11:48 PM
Aug 2013

a film maker...
As others have stated, this at least appears to be an act of deliberate intimidation toward Greenwald & certain types of investigative journalism.

 

Egnever

(21,506 posts)
11. A filmaker working on the release of stolen classified documents
Sun Aug 18, 2013, 11:57 PM
Aug 2013

You act like they are making a film about bunnies or something.

These folks are playing with fire and they know it. The poor me act is bullshit.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»only one in 2,000 people ...