Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
81 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Greenwald---just release everything and be done with it.... (Original Post) trumad Aug 2013 OP
+1 one_voice Aug 2013 #1
He has vowed to bring the UK to its knees Cali_Democrat Aug 2013 #2
He has puffed himself up to the fullest extent, MineralMan Aug 2013 #5
LOL! Perfect. nt SunSeeker Aug 2013 #49
That's an interesting choice of words ... sabrina 1 Aug 2013 #75
Thanks. I thought so too. MineralMan Aug 2013 #79
I thought you would. A lot of things have been Biblically inspired. sabrina 1 Aug 2013 #80
Someone warn the Queen SummerSnow Aug 2013 #31
Will he be using the Spanish Armada? LordGlenconner Aug 2013 #54
Link? cui bono Aug 2013 #60
I "think" this is what the poster is referring to: snappyturtle Aug 2013 #77
Yeah, I'm sure his words were twisted and exaggerated. cui bono Aug 2013 #78
I hope the info keeps being released slowly quinnox Aug 2013 #3
That's where I'm at! Keep the issue front and center, wake up people. Little Star Aug 2013 #8
And remember how the same people slammed Manning for just 'releasing everything without sabrina 1 Aug 2013 #21
You said it. It makes perfect sense to release this slowly, it has been working like a charm quinnox Aug 2013 #22
You do realize there is no amorphous 'they', right? randome Aug 2013 #23
When the same people all say the same thing then all change their minds about the same thing, sabrina 1 Aug 2013 #30
If it walks like a cult and talks like a cult reusrename Aug 2013 #72
Same here. Let it dribble out and remain in the news cycles. nt Mojorabbit Aug 2013 #81
Oh I forgot... Cali_Democrat Aug 2013 #4
Great! ocpagu Aug 2013 #17
... SaveOurDemocracy Aug 2013 #47
I want it out a little at a time. Keep it front and center. Autumn Aug 2013 #6
Bad strategy... trumad Aug 2013 #7
in whose opinion? grasswire Aug 2013 #9
No, you see your little clique on DU. And it isn't growing. KittyWampus Aug 2013 #11
The guardian comments section is not exactly a representative sample. nt geek tragedy Aug 2013 #28
I respectfully disagree that he is losing high ground fast. Little Star Aug 2013 #10
I really don't see it that way. Autumn Aug 2013 #35
I have to say---this is the longest last story ever on DU. trumad Aug 2013 #42
I thought that at first, I was like oh shit, you idiot Autumn Aug 2013 #58
I think the longer is carries out.. trumad Aug 2013 #62
I think it's going to get bad no matter what Autumn Aug 2013 #65
Reporters Without Borders; terror law reviewer; shadow home secretary; Liberty muriel_volestrangler Aug 2013 #67
I'm saying he will lose it by threatening the UK and USA. trumad Aug 2013 #73
Standing up to thugs is the correct thing to do muriel_volestrangler Aug 2013 #74
Look--- trumad Aug 2013 #76
Yes, I remain surprised TPTB are being so helpful in that process. bemildred Aug 2013 #24
DUrec...nt SidDithers Aug 2013 #12
He loves the attention. bravenak Aug 2013 #13
No, he is probably very pissed off at the high handed manner in which TPTB are acting. Th1onein Aug 2013 #34
Yeah, I don't think so. bravenak Aug 2013 #36
Believe what you want. Your opinion matters nothing to me. Th1onein Aug 2013 #37
It's nice here. bravenak Aug 2013 #38
Also well-populated Hekate Aug 2013 #50
Cheers! bravenak Aug 2013 #53
He wants to use the info to his advantage, obviously. He'll hold onto it, or release it, when it TwilightGardener Aug 2013 #14
then he also has to expect the fallout from doing things that way... VanillaRhapsody Aug 2013 #27
+1 CakeGrrl Aug 2013 #15
He is not trying to report now....he is trying to shape the narrative to his advantage VanillaRhapsody Aug 2013 #29
Thank you...Been asking for this from day one.... Blue_Tires Aug 2013 #16
I said that a month ago...don't be a poser, release it all snooper2 Aug 2013 #18
He already showed his best hand. randome Aug 2013 #19
really power point? tell me you are kidding.... madrchsod Aug 2013 #43
So you're no longer "waiting for the facts"? DisgustipatedinCA Aug 2013 #45
But, but that would interfere with... stevenleser Aug 2013 #20
It's more effective to put it out in bits to keep the spotlight on the issue. Tierra_y_Libertad Aug 2013 #25
My longstanding fear is still that Blue_Tires Aug 2013 #71
NSA---just release everything and be done with it... Waiting For Everyman Aug 2013 #26
+1 But they should do it truthfully next time around. cui bono Aug 2013 #64
Gauging from the mounting overreaction by the US, UK and NATO, the current approach is working leveymg Aug 2013 #32
So the U.S. and Russia are going to bomb Europe? Pretzel_Warrior Aug 2013 #46
Couldn't find an illustration of Brazil being blown up - but London N1 will do in a pinch. ;-) leveymg Aug 2013 #66
But the drama is such fun! JNelson6563 Aug 2013 #33
Someday. randome Aug 2013 #39
I'd actually like to see that; or, if nothing else, a large info dump of the allegedly critical info LanternWaste Aug 2013 #40
then he`d go away! madrchsod Aug 2013 #41
yeah. you're being a shock tease Pretzel_Warrior Aug 2013 #44
Maybe he doesn't think all of the information should be released. BlueCheese Aug 2013 #48
OK---I'll buy that...BUT... trumad Aug 2013 #52
He's not holding it back for "corroborating evidence." SunSeeker Aug 2013 #59
Yep Andy823 Aug 2013 #69
That ship has sailed Blue_Tires Aug 2013 #70
We won't be 'done' with this Lonr Aug 2013 #51
Hey, authoritarian, why do you hate America? LordGlenconner Aug 2013 #55
Release everything from on and around 09/11/2001 KansDem Aug 2013 #56
Good idea... ljm2002 Aug 2013 #57
K & R SunSeeker Aug 2013 #61
That wouldn't be very effective. cui bono Aug 2013 #63
It takes time to analyze the files David Krout Aug 2013 #68

snappyturtle

(14,656 posts)
77. I "think" this is what the poster is referring to:
Mon Aug 19, 2013, 06:46 PM
Aug 2013
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/20/world/europe/britain-detains-the-partner-of-glen-greenwald.html?pagewanted=2&_r=0


Mr. Miranda arrived Monday in Rio de Janeiro and was greeted by Mr. Greenwald, who said that in response to the detention, he planned “to write much more aggressively than before” about government snooping. “I’m going to publish many more things about England as well,” he said. “I have many documents about the system of espionage of England, and now my focus will be there, too. I think they’ll regret what they’ve done.”


...........................
I don't believe Greenwald's words warrant, "bringing a country to its knees"....but by now
we both know how the hyperbole concerning Greenwald invariably tilts. imho

cui bono

(19,926 posts)
78. Yeah, I'm sure his words were twisted and exaggerated.
Mon Aug 19, 2013, 07:38 PM
Aug 2013

but we'll see if that poster can provide anything to back up what they said...

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
21. And remember how the same people slammed Manning for just 'releasing everything without
Mon Aug 19, 2013, 02:14 PM
Aug 2013

careful review'!! Lol, they don't know which way to turn.

Greenwald has explained WHY he is releasing it all slowly. He is doing exactly what the detractors demanded. Do not release anything until it has been carefully reviewed.

So shouldn't they now be praising him for his care in making sure that what he has should be released or should not be, working with others to make that determination??

This is why they have no credibility. There is zero consistently in their attacks on the messengers.

 

quinnox

(20,600 posts)
22. You said it. It makes perfect sense to release this slowly, it has been working like a charm
Mon Aug 19, 2013, 02:16 PM
Aug 2013

The NSA spying has remained in the spotlight ever since. "Don't fix what isn't broken".

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
23. You do realize there is no amorphous 'they', right?
Mon Aug 19, 2013, 02:19 PM
Aug 2013

Everyone has an opinion. With 20,000 people or so, you will probably find 60,000 opinions.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Don't ever underestimate the long-term effects of a good night's sleep.[/center][/font][hr]

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
30. When the same people all say the same thing then all change their minds about the same thing,
Mon Aug 19, 2013, 02:39 PM
Aug 2013

they become an 'amorphous they'. When a number of people all at the same time change their minds on a matter of importance, then collectively change it back again, they are an 'amorphous they'.

 

reusrename

(1,716 posts)
72. If it walks like a cult and talks like a cult
Mon Aug 19, 2013, 05:50 PM
Aug 2013

it's probably just a group of independent thinkers who share the same views and yet deny it.

 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
4. Oh I forgot...
Mon Aug 19, 2013, 01:56 PM
Aug 2013

He's got a book coming out.

It wouldn't be beneficial for him financially to release all the information.

He's gotta save a lot for the book release.

 

ocpagu

(1,954 posts)
17. Great!
Mon Aug 19, 2013, 02:11 PM
Aug 2013

Hope his book becomes a blockbuster. He deserves it. And he also deserves all financial gains he obtains from his job. He's a journalist, after all, it's his profession.

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
9. in whose opinion?
Mon Aug 19, 2013, 02:01 PM
Aug 2013

I see his support growing.

Head over to the Guardian and read the comments sections.

Autumn

(45,082 posts)
35. I really don't see it that way.
Mon Aug 19, 2013, 03:29 PM
Aug 2013

It keeps the discussion going and the longer it goes on the better it is, as to losing the high ground I guess that depends on which OP you are looking at. Right now, there is a lot of chatter on both side of the issue but no one as of yet knows all the facts. I expect we will hear more as this story plays out today .

 

trumad

(41,692 posts)
42. I have to say---this is the longest last story ever on DU.
Mon Aug 19, 2013, 04:26 PM
Aug 2013

I understand it's implications and am on Snowden's side with this.

But--- Glenn lashing out like this is not smart in mho.

Autumn

(45,082 posts)
58. I thought that at first, I was like oh shit, you idiot
Mon Aug 19, 2013, 04:48 PM
Aug 2013

Then I realized I would fucking be furious if that happened to my spouse. As for him having all those electronics, I have a lot of that same crap when I travel, just because I have to keep myself amused or I drive my husband crazy.

As for him carrying documents, Glen didn't say that. Everything else was attributed to Glen by the reporter, except that little blurb. I don't know if anything has changed on that but if it has that will be posted of that I'm sure.

muriel_volestrangler

(101,316 posts)
67. Reporters Without Borders; terror law reviewer; shadow home secretary; Liberty
Mon Aug 19, 2013, 05:10 PM
Aug 2013
Reporters Without Borders is outraged that US journalist Glen Greenwald’s Brazilian partner David Miranda was detained and questioned for nine hours yesterday at London’s Heathrow airport under the UK’s Terrorism Act, and that his mobile phone, laptop and other computer equipment were all seized.

Greenwald is the Guardian journalist who has played a leading role in analysing and publishing US whistleblower Edward Snowden’s revelations about the NSA’s electronic surveillance programmes.

“The world’s most repressive states often identify journalism with terrorism and now the British authorities have crossed a red line by resorting to this practice,” Reporters Without Borders said.

“We are very disturbed by this unacceptable violation of the UK’s obligations to respect freedom of information and the confidentiality of journalists’ sources. By acting in this arbitrary way, the British authorities have just emphasized how necessary and legitimate Snowden’s and Greenwald’s revelations were.

http://en.rsf.org/united-kingdom-snowden-journalist-glenn-greenwald-19-08-2013,45062.html


Britain's anti-terrorist legislation watchdog has called on the Home Office and Metropolitan police to explain why anti-terror laws were used to detain the partner of the Guardian journalist Glenn Greenwald for nine hours at Heathrow airport.

Amid mounting concern across the political spectrum over the treatment of David Miranda, David Anderson QC said the detention of Greenwald's partner on Sunday appeared to be "unusual".
...
The intervention by Anderson came as the shadow home secretary, Yvette Cooper, called for an urgent investigation into the use of schedule 7 of the Terrorism Act 2000 to detain Miranda. Cooper said ministers must find out whether anti-terror laws had been misused after detention caused "considerable consternation".

Cooper said public support for schedule 7 of the Terrorism Act could be undermined if there was a perception it was not being used for the right purposes. "Any suggestion that terror powers are being misused must be investigated and clarified urgently," she said. "The public support for these powers must not be endangered by a perception of misuse.

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/aug/19/david-miranda-detention-terrorism-law-watchdog


Liberty has long argued that Schedule 7 is overbroad legislation, ripe for misuse and discrimination, and currently has a case pending at the European Court of Human Rights challenging the power. The case involves a British citizen of Asian origin who was detained at Heathrow under Schedule 7 for four and a half hours in November 2010. During his detention, he was questioned about his salary, his voting habits and the trip he had been on, among other matters. Copies were taken of all his paperwork and credit cards and the police kept his mobile phone, which was only returned to him eight days later after having to pay for its return himself. He had never previously been arrested or detained by the police and was travelling entirely lawfully.

Shami Chakrabarti, Director of Liberty, said:

"David Miranda's chilling 9-hour detention was possible due to the breathtakingly broad Schedule 7 power, which requires no suspicion and is routinely abused. People are held for long periods, subject to strip searches, saliva swabbing and confiscation of property - all without access to a publicly funded lawyer. Liberty is already challenging this law in the Court of Human Rights but MPs disturbed by this latest scandal should repeal it without delay.”

http://www.liberty-human-rights.org.uk/media/press/2013/Detention-of-journalists-partner-highlights-the-scandal-of-Schedule-7.php


Juan Cole: Greenwald Partner falsely detained as Terrorist: How to Create a Dictatorship

Andrew Sullivan: Cameron Proves Greenwald Right

Kevin Drum: security authorities can't be trusted with the power we've given them

Amnesty International: Detention of Guardian journalist's partner at Heathrow unlawful and unwarranted


You think he's 'losing high ground'? It's hard to see how he could get much higher now.

muriel_volestrangler

(101,316 posts)
74. Standing up to thugs is the correct thing to do
Mon Aug 19, 2013, 06:16 PM
Aug 2013

Is your avatar a reference to a hoodie, likeTrayvon Martin? The US and UK governments are in the role of Zimmerman here.

 

trumad

(41,692 posts)
76. Look---
Mon Aug 19, 2013, 06:42 PM
Aug 2013

That's fine and dandy...

But I'm telling you..public opinion will turn against him.

Watch and see.

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
24. Yes, I remain surprised TPTB are being so helpful in that process.
Mon Aug 19, 2013, 02:21 PM
Aug 2013

It's like they want the fuss to get bigger.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
13. He loves the attention.
Mon Aug 19, 2013, 02:05 PM
Aug 2013

I like his views on the Middle East. I agree with him a lot. But now he's just showing out and needs to reassess.

Th1onein

(8,514 posts)
34. No, he is probably very pissed off at the high handed manner in which TPTB are acting.
Mon Aug 19, 2013, 03:27 PM
Aug 2013

And I can't say that I blame him.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
36. Yeah, I don't think so.
Mon Aug 19, 2013, 03:37 PM
Aug 2013

I think he enjoys it. Or he would have FedEx'd it and we would have never known what he was doing. I was the admin and payroll admin at my previous employer and I did some serious mailing. Never had a package lost or stolen or even opened by FedEx. Or even the USPS. It's cheaper too. And you don't get caught at the airport trying to pass thumb drives and such. He knew he was being looked at since he called so much attention to himself and by extension his spouse.
Isn't this the same country who wouldn't let snoop dog in?
He likes the attention. Yes he does.

TwilightGardener

(46,416 posts)
14. He wants to use the info to his advantage, obviously. He'll hold onto it, or release it, when it
Mon Aug 19, 2013, 02:07 PM
Aug 2013

benefits him.

CakeGrrl

(10,611 posts)
15. +1
Mon Aug 19, 2013, 02:09 PM
Aug 2013

He looks more and more like an attention shill every day.

And he doesn't care who he uses (his own partner now) to keep the spotlight on him.

He's going to brag and blowhard about how the information he's holding could bring everything down, and then NOT expect eyes to be on his partner making a trip to Poitras, but then go all "VICTIM!" when the man is detained?

Attention shill.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
29. He is not trying to report now....he is trying to shape the narrative to his advantage
Mon Aug 19, 2013, 02:29 PM
Aug 2013

he kinda loses credibility by doing that...

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
16. Thank you...Been asking for this from day one....
Mon Aug 19, 2013, 02:11 PM
Aug 2013

Especially since there have been nonstop teases of "earth-shattering, tip of the iceberg" documents...

 

snooper2

(30,151 posts)
18. I said that a month ago...don't be a poser, release it all
Mon Aug 19, 2013, 02:12 PM
Aug 2013

Snowy should have done it himself instead of hiding out in a Russian pub LOL

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
19. He already showed his best hand.
Mon Aug 19, 2013, 02:12 PM
Aug 2013

PowerPoint slides!

That's almost as funny as "I am not here to hide from justice."
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Don't ever underestimate the long-term effects of a good night's sleep.[/center][/font][hr]

 

DisgustipatedinCA

(12,530 posts)
45. So you're no longer "waiting for the facts"?
Mon Aug 19, 2013, 04:28 PM
Aug 2013

I'll just mark that in the "all facts established via PowerPoint" column.

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
25. It's more effective to put it out in bits to keep the spotlight on the issue.
Mon Aug 19, 2013, 02:24 PM
Aug 2013

That way the regime can't cover it up with a few CYA statements and promises of "reform".

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
71. My longstanding fear is still that
Mon Aug 19, 2013, 05:41 PM
Aug 2013

the longer he holds on to unreleased info, the more likely governments will find *some* way sooner or later to make a deal...

And as I said in another thread, if he has the bombshells, why am I forced to wait for verification/vindication of certain crimes I've long suspected?

If nothing else, he could at least release stuff more often than he's doing now...

Waiting For Everyman

(9,385 posts)
26. NSA---just release everything and be done with it...
Mon Aug 19, 2013, 02:27 PM
Aug 2013

NSA's information "drip" is much slower than Greenwald's.

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
32. Gauging from the mounting overreaction by the US, UK and NATO, the current approach is working
Mon Aug 19, 2013, 02:54 PM
Aug 2013

splendidly. By this point next month, StratCom should be at DefCon4 and Southern Brazil may seem unseasonably warm:



leveymg

(36,418 posts)
66. Couldn't find an illustration of Brazil being blown up - but London N1 will do in a pinch. ;-)
Mon Aug 19, 2013, 05:03 PM
Aug 2013

Can't even find a photo of war that Brazil was involved in going back to the "Acre War" with Bolivia which ended in 1903. This is best I could come up with on short notice:

JNelson6563

(28,151 posts)
33. But the drama is such fun!
Mon Aug 19, 2013, 03:11 PM
Aug 2013

Isn't it amazing how there is no talk about actual revelations, just GG and of course occasional references about all the stuff he's gonna tell us, someday.

Says it all, dontcha think?

Julie

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
39. Someday.
Mon Aug 19, 2013, 04:00 PM
Aug 2013

[hr][font color="blue"][center]Don't ever underestimate the long-term effects of a good night's sleep.[/center][/font][hr]
 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
40. I'd actually like to see that; or, if nothing else, a large info dump of the allegedly critical info
Mon Aug 19, 2013, 04:02 PM
Aug 2013

I'd actually like to see that; or, if nothing else, a large info dump of the allegedly critical information.

I'm not pretending to know about this circus one way or the other, but these guys certainly do seem to be dragging this story out for little more than dragging the story out.

Hunter Thompson is the only journalist to date that can make a story about himself entertaining. Anyone else doing it begins to lose credibility as time goes on.

BlueCheese

(2,522 posts)
48. Maybe he doesn't think all of the information should be released.
Mon Aug 19, 2013, 04:34 PM
Aug 2013

Some of it is probably legitimately should remain classified, and it takes time to go through all of it, get corroborating evidence, etc. Note that the Guardian and other papers redacted parts of the documents they released. They don't want to just dump it all out irresponsibly.

SunSeeker

(51,554 posts)
59. He's not holding it back for "corroborating evidence."
Mon Aug 19, 2013, 04:49 PM
Aug 2013

He is already describing it as true-- and marketing it as mind-blowing information. As someone up the thread said, it's a shock tease. And he's doing it for his own personal benefit.

If the actions described by the info he has are so awful, why is he letting them go on by not revealing them?

Andy823

(11,495 posts)
69. Yep
Mon Aug 19, 2013, 05:34 PM
Aug 2013

All you have to do to get "all" the "shocking", "mind blowing", "world changing" facts is simply wait till the BOOK comes out, and you can pay for the "privilege" of getting it all at once. Of course if it's not as mind blowing as he says, to bad, no refunds on the book!

 

Lonr

(103 posts)
51. We won't be 'done' with this
Mon Aug 19, 2013, 04:40 PM
Aug 2013

until we regain our freedom!!!! Get used to it, the ride gets a LOT bumpier from here on!

 

LordGlenconner

(1,348 posts)
55. Hey, authoritarian, why do you hate America?
Mon Aug 19, 2013, 04:45 PM
Aug 2013

And specifically the Constitution?

Surely you must if you are not a Greenwald-Snowden devotee?



ljm2002

(10,751 posts)
57. Good idea...
Mon Aug 19, 2013, 04:47 PM
Aug 2013

...then people can run around claiming he dumped documents with no thought as to what was in them or what effects their release might have on sources and agents on the ground.

Yeah, that's a real good idea.



cui bono

(19,926 posts)
63. That wouldn't be very effective.
Mon Aug 19, 2013, 04:53 PM
Aug 2013

It would just bury the story. Too much info to work through by a lazy press. It would be unorganized, too much for the general public to sift through and digest in any logical manner.

Also, this way each time more info is released the story stays alive, which it needs to if we have any glimmer of hope of changing the way the NSA operates.

And as the NSA lies about what they do or do not do, out comes leaks proving they are lying to us. Way better this way.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Greenwald---just release ...