Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

boston bean

(36,221 posts)
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 08:52 AM Aug 2013

One reason only for these recent abuses

To preface:

1) Both the UK and the US know what is contained in the info Snowden released, if they don't they are incompetent buffoons.
2) There are multiple electronic copies of these leaked documents. They don't exist in one place. If authorities in the UK and US don't know this, it is more evidence that they are incompetent buffoons.
3) It is unlikely they are incompetent buffoons of this magnitude.

So, why:

1) Detain Greenwalds partner at Heathrow and confiscate, drives, thumb drives, phones, etc, that may contain info that they know the contents of and can't control further dissemination?
2) Destroy the electronic appliances containing these documents, that they strong arm the Guardian into letting them destroy?

Reason:

Intimidate journalists who may be leaked sensitive documents of government wrong doing, in the future. Make them unlikely to report abuses, that have been leaked to them.

You OK with that? If so, why?

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
One reason only for these recent abuses (Original Post) boston bean Aug 2013 OP
Not exactly TomClash Aug 2013 #1
OK, still wouldn't the above still be true? boston bean Aug 2013 #2
Oh, I agree with all that TomClash Aug 2013 #3

TomClash

(11,344 posts)
1. Not exactly
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 09:28 AM
Aug 2013

Not exactly, I think the UK is trying to interrupt the communications flow between Greenwald and Poitras.

boston bean

(36,221 posts)
2. OK, still wouldn't the above still be true?
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 09:31 AM
Aug 2013

Plus therre's a lot of talk about "stolen documents".

They think Poitras doesn't have copies, and is this something we want th gov't interfering with... This isn't the definition of a free press, at least to me.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»One reason only for these...