Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kpete

(71,986 posts)
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 09:55 AM Aug 2013

"I wonder how many have truly understood The Absolute Threat"

Alan Rushbridger, editor of the Guardian, wrote this:

The state that is building such a formidable apparatus of surveillance will do its best to prevent journalists from reporting on it. Most journalists can see that. But I wonder how many have truly understood the absolute threat to journalism implicit in the idea of total surveillance, when or if it comes -- and, increasingly, it looks like "when".

from here, more:
http://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2013/08/snowden-wars-episode-v-surveillance-state-strikes-back
30 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"I wonder how many have truly understood The Absolute Threat" (Original Post) kpete Aug 2013 OP
"total surveillance" snooper2 Aug 2013 #1
Watched this for free on Youtube this afternoon and am amazed snappyturtle Aug 2013 #30
Thanks Kpete! k&r Plus I found the end of the piece pure truth telling..... Little Star Aug 2013 #2
Agreed! n/t Aerows Aug 2013 #3
Yep. East Coast Pirate Aug 2013 #4
let's not forget the murder of Michael Hastings NoMoreWarNow Aug 2013 #13
It totally was Hydra Aug 2013 #14
forget about it, indeed NoMoreWarNow Aug 2013 #27
I admit it wasn't in the front of my mind in this Hydra Aug 2013 #28
Just came here to paste that....somehow I missed this OP snappyturtle Aug 2013 #23
I say most not an apologist stupidicus Aug 2013 #5
Big Q Cryptoad Aug 2013 #6
Can Terrorism be conducted in Journalism Clothing, a Priest's collar, a blogger? Lets investigate Katashi_itto Aug 2013 #8
Thank you Cryptoad Aug 2013 #9
Oh look, I totally called it! Hydra Aug 2013 #15
Still unable to answer the Q? nt Cryptoad Aug 2013 #17
You didn't submit a question Hydra Aug 2013 #18
Well worth the few minutes to read. CrispyQ Aug 2013 #7
Funny how all the usual suspects are already falling in line. Spitfire of ATJ Aug 2013 #10
Some said the NDAA was the absolute threat. midnight Aug 2013 #11
The NDAA combined with the total surveillance of metadata - horrible. JDPriestly Aug 2013 #21
YES! I mention the NDAA and the total surveillance of metadata snappyturtle Aug 2013 #24
K&R. blackspade Aug 2013 #12
given much of the CRAP that passes for journalism these days hfojvt Aug 2013 #16
"I am not sure why we are supposed to be worried about journalism" Maedhros Aug 2013 #20
+100000000000000 Little Star Aug 2013 #25
again, we have not had a "healthy, free press" for decades hfojvt Aug 2013 #26
Kick And Recommend cantbeserious Aug 2013 #19
K&R idwiyo Aug 2013 #22
The Authoritarians among us dont care. They have chosen a leader and they rhett o rick Aug 2013 #29
 

snooper2

(30,151 posts)
1. "total surveillance"
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 10:05 AM
Aug 2013

Be nice if Alan would take the time to expand on what "total surveillance" is comprised of.


Does he have something like this scene in his head?

snappyturtle

(14,656 posts)
30. Watched this for free on Youtube this afternoon and am amazed
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 09:16 PM
Aug 2013

at how pertinent it is today! I've seen it before...but NOW...wow!
Thanks for posting the clip..

Little Star

(17,055 posts)
2. Thanks Kpete! k&r Plus I found the end of the piece pure truth telling.....
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 10:41 AM
Aug 2013
I don't know how this turns out any more than you do. In the end, maybe the centrifugal forces of the internet really will win the day. After all, as Rusbridger pointed out to the GCHQ folks, destroying a few hard drives in London didn't make the slightest difference to the Guardian's ability to report the Snowden story.

On the other hand, Snowden himself is bottled up in Russia. Julian Assange is trapped like a rat in the Ecuadorian embassy in London. Wikileaks has been crippled by concerted international sanctions. Bradley Manning will spend the rest of his life in jail. And even the thickest-skinned journalists will think twice before tackling sensitive subjects now that they know their spouses, family, and friends are considered fair game for harassment by any sufficiently annoyed security agency. If even the president of Bolivia can't escape harassment, what chance do you have?

 

NoMoreWarNow

(1,259 posts)
13. let's not forget the murder of Michael Hastings
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 11:52 AM
Aug 2013

I suspect that was part and parcel of this whole intimidation ploy.

Hydra

(14,459 posts)
14. It totally was
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 12:19 PM
Aug 2013

And it was directed at a specific group of people. The rest of us were supposed to forget about it.

Hydra

(14,459 posts)
28. I admit it wasn't in the front of my mind in this
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 03:47 PM
Aug 2013

And it probably should have been. He was killed to silence him and send a message to others, not unlike how Greenwald's partner was detained and threatened.

It's all related. They bank on us not seeing all of it as a whole pattern.

snappyturtle

(14,656 posts)
23. Just came here to paste that....somehow I missed this OP
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 01:58 PM
Aug 2013

entirely! Glad to have found it as I think it makes a case to those
who think we protest too much.....time will tell.

 

stupidicus

(2,570 posts)
5. I say most not an apologist
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 10:53 AM
Aug 2013

it doesn't really take genius to figure out what the many ramifications of TS can be.

I'd say the goal is obviously approximating as closely as possible, total control in deed if not thought.

Welcome to the beehive

 

Katashi_itto

(10,175 posts)
8. Can Terrorism be conducted in Journalism Clothing, a Priest's collar, a blogger? Lets investigate
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 11:15 AM
Aug 2013

everyone. Since it's all just a slippery slope...

Hydra

(14,459 posts)
15. Oh look, I totally called it!
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 12:21 PM
Aug 2013

Journalism = Terrorism when it's not state approved.

But isn't that the essence of "Terrorism"? Any act or belief not sanctioned by the Gov't?

Hydra

(14,459 posts)
18. You didn't submit a question
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 12:37 PM
Aug 2013

You posted a talking point that I predicted.

Also, I already answered you. Who is defining the word "Terror"? If it's just one government's opinion, why would it matter? We laugh when Putin puts people like Pussy Riot in jail rather than agreeing that they are a threat to society.

Why should it be different if it's the US is doing it? I laugh when they claim to have killed "The #2 Al-Qaeda _____."

snappyturtle

(14,656 posts)
24. YES! I mention the NDAA and the total surveillance of metadata
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 02:01 PM
Aug 2013

to people I talk with, and it's like talking to the carpet! They
don't have a clue about any of this!!?? THAT scares me.

hfojvt

(37,573 posts)
16. given much of the CRAP that passes for journalism these days
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 12:22 PM
Aug 2013

and I include the latest issue of Mother Jones in that crap, unfortunately, Drums article on austerity includes a fair amount of ridiculous nonsense passing as "populist economics". (example - "the desperately needed" accursed payroll tax cut that Drum mourns the expiration of).

I am not sure why we are supposed to be worried about "journalism".

Where the hell has this guy been? Most "journalism" got bought up over twenty years ago and is a bane to the existence of ordinary society.

 

Maedhros

(10,007 posts)
20. "I am not sure why we are supposed to be worried about journalism"
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 12:49 PM
Aug 2013

This is a stunning admission on your part. A healthy, free press is absolutely necessary for a functioning democracy.

Your answer to a sick and dying free press is to neglect it further? That will not solve the problem.

hfojvt

(37,573 posts)
26. again, we have not had a "healthy, free press" for decades
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 03:30 PM
Aug 2013

The question is whether I am gonna get all excited somehow about the loss of crap like Fox News, The NY Times, the WaPo, MSNBC, CBS News.

Those places are not part of a "healthy, free press" they are part of corporate propaganda. They are junk. They are rot. So I am not cry if they die. Maybe the death of those corrupt and rotten old institutions will allow something new and vibrant to grow from their ashes. Fighting to save the rot, is not gonna suddenly make it healthy and vibrant.

Even the left wing press does not seem much better to me. In the last year, I have quit my subscriptions to Mother Jones, The Nation, and The Progressive, because they struck me as useless at best.

I too, like journalism in theory, but not so much in actual practice.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
29. The Authoritarians among us dont care. They have chosen a leader and they
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 07:07 PM
Aug 2013

will follow him off the cliff. Life is so much easier or should I say bliss.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"I wonder how many have t...