Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
135 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Some have mentioned: Why bring up NSA Spying now and not back in 2006? (Original Post) Octafish Aug 2013 OP
Because Bush. n/t librechik Aug 2013 #1
Bush tried making it illegal to point out illegal FISA policies. Octafish Aug 2013 #10
Obama, being a Constitutional scholar Aerows Aug 2013 #32
Bush didn't like people reporting his administration's illegal activities, but Obama's admin has hughee99 Aug 2013 #62
That's all okay Aerows Aug 2013 #63
There is something striking about that specific contrast. Octafish Aug 2013 #102
You think he suceeded!! nt Progressive dog Aug 2013 #98
Apparently. He's not in jail, nor are his warmonger cronies. Octafish Aug 2013 #99
But that's not what you were claiming he was doing. Progressive dog Aug 2013 #100
Help me understand what you are talking about, then. Octafish Aug 2013 #104
Just go back and read your posts, Progressive dog Aug 2013 #106
''Money trumps peace.'' -- George Walker Bush*, ''president'' of the United States, Feb. 14, 2007 Octafish Aug 2013 #111
The issue back then was warrantless wiretapping. And many of us demanded we go back to FISA. stevenleser Aug 2013 #2
You forgot the sarcasm tag... villager Aug 2013 #3
You forgot the sarcasm tag when you just attacked Kennedy and Carter's law. stevenleser Aug 2013 #4
+1 Thank You dennis4868 Aug 2013 #6
I'm sure you'd acknowledge that things have changed quite a bit since the PATRIOT Act. EOTE Aug 2013 #8
+1 Thank you nt villager Aug 2013 #16
Probably not, for this particular person Aerows Aug 2013 #36
What a shame. EOTE Aug 2013 #41
To throw 1st Amendment rights to the wolves Aerows Aug 2013 #43
Jury result. Aerows Aug 2013 #107
So the FISA Act from 1977 is Kennedy's law? villager Aug 2013 #13
Google is your friend stevenleser Aug 2013 #15
So are non-hasty replies villager Aug 2013 #17
Prior to FISA the executive's surveillance power was inherent and unchecked Recursion Aug 2013 #119
The Church Committee and FISA (Bill Moyers) Octafish Aug 2013 #126
A law that is unconstitutional, has not worked and needs to be repealed. JDPriestly Aug 2013 #20
A law that has been upheld dozens of times in appeals courts you mean? nt stevenleser Aug 2013 #50
Have they approved the current interpretation? lark Aug 2013 #65
Have they struck down the current interpretation? nt stevenleser Aug 2013 #69
nice. Eko Aug 2013 #129
+1 uponit7771 Aug 2013 #30
Weak, man. Really weak. MNBrewer Aug 2013 #39
I explained all that when I covered it. Not knowing the facts and history and commenting? Thats weak stevenleser Aug 2013 #64
THE FISA COURT IS A RUBBER STAMP MNBrewer Aug 2013 #76
Oh, CAPS, well why didn't you use CAPS to begin with? That changes everything. stevenleser Aug 2013 #87
Post removed Post removed Aug 2013 #96
Since you offer no knowledge at all, I'll assume you are projecting. Besides... stevenleser Aug 2013 #110
I can't believe the vile shit slung at you by some DUers. SunSeeker Aug 2013 #132
I think it's an expression of their feelings of powerlessness and lack of a voice stevenleser Aug 2013 #134
You're a good egg, Steve. SunSeeker Aug 2013 #135
And of course your blog is the last word on this subject. East Coast Pirate Aug 2013 #97
Glad I could be of assistance. nt stevenleser Aug 2013 #108
+1 Thank you. nt snappyturtle Aug 2013 #5
No, he's serious. Aerows Aug 2013 #35
I don't know. Kinda sad, really. villager Aug 2013 #37
"This is the Central Scrutinizer, all subsequent critical thinking is now banned." Enthusiast Aug 2013 #89
No Eko Aug 2013 #130
J. Edgar Hoover with Supercomputers Octafish Aug 2013 #21
SCREW FACTS!!! /sarcasm <---- cause this is needed here uponit7771 Aug 2013 #29
No offense Aerows Aug 2013 #42
REALLY!?! How is agreeing with a post with sarcasm (now noted) shouting neener neener!? uponit7771 Aug 2013 #48
Objection noted n/t Aerows Aug 2013 #52
Yes the pre-Patriot Act FISA. Do you support Obama's use of the Patriot Act? rhett o rick Aug 2013 #44
BUT there was NO teevee gnews HUGH & CRY! no stirring of the sheeples fears as now. pansypoo53219 Aug 2013 #46
Nope. bvar22 Aug 2013 #71
You should post that clip as an OP. It pretty much says it all. dawg Aug 2013 #80
Because... dennis4868 Aug 2013 #7
The great DUer bobthedrummer did the job back in 2003... Octafish Aug 2013 #25
"Conspiracy Theorists"?? Wilms Aug 2013 #9
CT is a pejorative term over used by those that blindly follow their leaders. rhett o rick Aug 2013 #45
I think that was sarcasm Aerows Aug 2013 #53
I recognized the sarcasm. Just saw an opportunity to put in my two rhett o rick Aug 2013 #78
LOL! n/t Aerows Aug 2013 #92
I really should consider the sarcasm tag. Wilms Aug 2013 #90
No it's cool. I got it and I am usually the one that doesnt. See post #78 above. nm rhett o rick Aug 2013 #103
The story officially starts in 1981... Octafish Aug 2013 #86
Why do I find myself bookmarking ALL your threads? Thanks, so much for the history and perspective. chimpymustgo Aug 2013 #113
Well,the hair on fire crowd needs some kind of justification for not caring until now. railsback Aug 2013 #11
Before Obama tripled the amount of oversight? pnwmom Aug 2013 #12
Snowden provided the evidence for that Recursion Aug 2013 #120
Thanks for explaining. I had misunderstood "oversight" to mean "surveillance." pnwmom Aug 2013 #121
Gotcha. "Oversight" is one of those weird words that means its own opposite Recursion Aug 2013 #123
With over 2000 abuses that they are admitting. Savannahmann Aug 2013 #14
So which is it, there are no audits/oversight or there is? Pick a lane. KittyWampus Aug 2013 #28
Doesn't matter what lane they pick the NSA will never ever be able to meet the standard of HOF uponit7771 Aug 2013 #34
There are oversights Aerows Aug 2013 #58
----asdlkfae'ek##--- oops, mistypedd… crap.. mispelled… darn railsback Aug 2013 #51
Boston Marathon Aerows Aug 2013 #60
Oh, I thought the U.S. was spying on EVERYBODY railsback Aug 2013 #93
Tripled the oversight - that's a lie Capt. Obvious Aug 2013 #18
4 X 0 = 0 rhett o rick Aug 2013 #22
Oversight now-a-days means to fly a drone over the site and take pictures. RC Aug 2013 #82
+1 uponit7771 Aug 2013 #31
Let's talk about this "triple oversight". Looks to me like there is zero oversight. rhett o rick Aug 2013 #40
It will never be enough railsback Aug 2013 #49
Snort.... blackspade Aug 2013 #59
Stop laughing. Enthusiast Aug 2013 #91
Yeah, kills the Greenwald action movie coming out railsback Aug 2013 #95
Because there was still hope that a government headed by Cerridwen Aug 2013 #19
The treatment afforded RFK, Jr. made me wonder if this was Parallel Hell Hole Bus Stop No. 9. Octafish Aug 2013 #88
Remember them? Hell, I are one 'o them. Cerridwen Aug 2013 #94
K&R! Octafish, rockin' the spot since forever! n/t Fire Walk With Me Aug 2013 #23
Others have changed their mind and now think it's peachy. hootinholler Aug 2013 #24
Tip of the iceberg. JEB Aug 2013 #26
K&R. The excuses and deflections never stop. AnotherMcIntosh Aug 2013 #27
Deja DU: Are ALL COMMUNICATIONS routed overseas to circumvent US law and the Constitution? Coyotl Aug 2013 #33
WE DID ..... Triana Aug 2013 #38
This is all a part of the "Its not real" propaganda campaign. bvar22 Aug 2013 #77
Many of us fought for our fourth Amendment rights then as now. rhett o rick Aug 2013 #47
Dont'cha know once Obama got in all of the Republicans in charge at the NSA were transformed,... Spitfire of ATJ Aug 2013 #57
kick for truth... Blue_Tires Aug 2013 #54
I was posting Glenn Greenwald's columns about it back in the day ... meegbear Aug 2013 #55
I knew it was a threat the moment I saw the movie Sneakers PatrynXX Aug 2013 #56
Truth! k&r Little Star Aug 2013 #61
Because The Black Tax is in full effect. Has been since the guy raised Liberal_Stalwart71 Aug 2013 #66
Thanks for this! I thought it was just me (I'm a "conspiracy theorist" from way back). nt silvershadow Aug 2013 #67
2006 bigtree Aug 2013 #68
Thanks, bigtree! Great information, yours. Octafish Aug 2013 #127
Probably they did not have such Helen Borg Aug 2013 #70
because it's being pushed by the right wing after being started by haters/clowns S.&G. ...nt uhnope Aug 2013 #72
Yes it CAN Happen Here – The Impending Death of American Democracy Octafish Aug 2013 #115
finally we go Godwin with this NSA panic. uhnope Aug 2013 #116
The hell with Godwin. Nothing funny about the NAZI influence on America's secret government. Octafish Aug 2013 #122
Obama wasn't President and an easy target of DUers like he is today George II Aug 2013 #73
Sen. Obama warned about Patriot Act abuses. President Obama proved him right. Octafish Aug 2013 #124
An excellent bookmarkable answer, but the question is silly as hell. Waiting For Everyman Aug 2013 #74
Well you have not changed Octafish zeemike Aug 2013 #75
Yes, many of us were called 'paranoid' especially after it was discovered that some Democrats sabrina 1 Aug 2013 #79
The Professional Paranoid Octafish Aug 2013 #83
Post removed Post removed Aug 2013 #81
I remember, Octafish. Blue_In_AK Aug 2013 #84
WE expected this from THEM. nt ileus Aug 2013 #85
I notice something Octafish. Rex Aug 2013 #101
DU can be a Truth Machine Octafish Aug 2013 #105
Same here bro. Rex Aug 2013 #109
"Time Wasters" How accurate!!!!! n/t slipslidingaway Aug 2013 #118
New generation has turned up. Neoma Aug 2013 #112
Some sure did! robertpaulsen Aug 2013 #114
This message was self-deleted by its author mother earth Aug 2013 #117
K&R. Yes indeed. Overseas Aug 2013 #125
Why not quarbis Aug 2013 #128
It was then (by some of us)..... DeSwiss Aug 2013 #131
because a democrat is in office and they know we will pile on..... spanone Aug 2013 #133

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
10. Bush tried making it illegal to point out illegal FISA policies.
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 11:40 AM
Aug 2013

From a blog, ca. 2006:



New crime to report Bush violating FISA

Patriot Daily News Clearinghouse, Daily kos
March 12, 2006

While a draft of the GOP proposed legislation sponsored by DeWine, Snowe, Graham and Hagel is not yet publicly available, some reporters have written about the substantive provisions after receiving a copy of the draft legislation. Not only does this legislation codify the existing illegal NSA program, but it creates new crimes to prevent the press from reporting on any FISA surveillance programs and Bush is the person who writes a list of the terrorists to be subjected to surveillance.

Some of the provisions of this new legislation include:

(1) The law will make it a crime for reporters and newspapers to publish stories that Bush violated the law or to simply report on the existence of the various FISA surveillance programs to the public. This handy provision protects Bush from any future leaks that he is violating the law governing surveillance of Americans. Criminal penalties would be applied to anyone who "intentionally discloses information identifying or describing" Bush's NSA program or any other surveillance of Americans under FISA. In addition, the scope of activities covered by criminal penalties is expanded by not including a requirement that the "information has to be harmful to national security or classified." Increased penalties of $1 million fines and/or 15 years in jail should be plenty deterrence for the media to not report on such surveillance in the future.

(2) The legislation codifies the primary components of Bush's existing illegal NSA surveillance of Americans. In other words, Bush may continue the surveillance program which violated American's rights, but now he may continue with the cover that Congress is making the program legal. The problem with Bush's NSA program was not just that it was illegal because it violated wiretapping laws and Congressional oversight laws, but also because it violated and lowered American civil right standards by permitting political appointees to make decisions that our system has wisely reserved to judges. These problems remain:

CONTINUED...

http://www.uruknet.info/?p=m21467&l=i&size=1&hd=0



I think he succeeded, seeing how he's not in jail.

Since time immemorial, war is money. Now it's against the law to point it out.
 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
32. Obama, being a Constitutional scholar
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 12:27 PM
Aug 2013

waved a magic wand or something because he is infallibly awesome and that doesn't matter anymore. Because Obama.

hughee99

(16,113 posts)
62. Bush didn't like people reporting his administration's illegal activities, but Obama's admin has
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 01:08 PM
Aug 2013

been much smarter. They got secret courts, whose rulings we can't challenge (or often even see), to declare the activities legal (as far as we know).

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
102. There is something striking about that specific contrast.
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 05:54 PM
Aug 2013

Turning a 16-year-old American kid into "bug splat" without due process of any kind did something to my hope for change.

Perhaps he had too. Then again, perhaps he wanted to. Either way, it was not a power assigned to the President in the Constitution of the United States, a copy of which can still be downloaded here for free, although in PDF form.

PS: Thank you for standing up to the nonsense about secret government, secret laws, secret surveillance, secret state, secret privilege, secret benefit and all the rest of the secret stuff, Aerows. It's starting to feel a lot like Krystallnacht.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
99. Apparently. He's not in jail, nor are his warmonger cronies.
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 05:42 PM
Aug 2013
Know your BFEE: Siegelman Judge is a big-time War Profiteer

Perhaps if enough people learned about the true extent of the war profiteering, they'd be mad, especially considering how the NSA enables the war profiteering.

Know your BFEE: WikiLeaks Stratfor Dump Exposes Continued Secret Government Warmongering

Progressive dog

(6,900 posts)
100. But that's not what you were claiming he was doing.
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 05:46 PM
Aug 2013
Bush tried making it illegal to point out illegal FISA policies.

War profiteering now, I almost think this is the Twilight Zone.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
104. Help me understand what you are talking about, then.
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 06:00 PM
Aug 2013

While I can't read your mind, war profiteering is what Bush and his family are all about. The fact they are not in jail says a lot to me. What is says to you is your business, thankfully.



Octafish

(55,745 posts)
111. ''Money trumps peace.'' -- George Walker Bush*, ''president'' of the United States, Feb. 14, 2007
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 06:29 PM
Aug 2013

Uttered at a press conference in which not a single member of the callow, cowed press corpse saw fit to ask a follow-up. Don't know what you think about it, Progressive dog, but, to me, that is criminal.



I remember Cindy Sheehan tried to bring it to our nation's attention.
 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
2. The issue back then was warrantless wiretapping. And many of us demanded we go back to FISA.
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 11:27 AM
Aug 2013

Which is what happened. Hence the difference between then and now and why it was so bad then and not now.

 

villager

(26,001 posts)
3. You forgot the sarcasm tag...
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 11:29 AM
Aug 2013

...when you mentioned with a straight face that the rubber-stamping FISA "court" makes things "not so bad" now...

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
4. You forgot the sarcasm tag when you just attacked Kennedy and Carter's law.
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 11:31 AM
Aug 2013

A law that the ACLU lauded when Kennedy died.

EOTE

(13,409 posts)
8. I'm sure you'd acknowledge that things have changed quite a bit since the PATRIOT Act.
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 11:38 AM
Aug 2013

Are endless rubber stamps really much better than the warrantless wiretapping done under Bush? Especially considering that the scope and scale of this has most likely simply grown since the Bush administration. As a journalist, do these revelations not provide a chilling effect?

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
36. Probably not, for this particular person
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 12:29 PM
Aug 2013

Let your imagination wander why that might be. The word "funding" and "appearances" would be the first place my mind might go.

EOTE

(13,409 posts)
41. What a shame.
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 12:33 PM
Aug 2013

I'd think that journalists would realize that they have the most to lose here. Yet so many are willing accomplices.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
43. To throw 1st Amendment rights to the wolves
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 12:35 PM
Aug 2013

right along with 4th Amendment search and seizure laws.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
107. Jury result.
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 06:11 PM
Aug 2013

This is a personal attack on stephenleser, the "particular person" referred to. It is openly suggesting he is paid to be here and is only appearing to be a Democrat/progressive.
> >
> > You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Tue Aug 20, 2013, 01:32 PM, and the Jury voted 0-6 to LEAVE IT.
> >
> > Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: I believe Aerows is referring to stevenleser's appearances on Fox News and such.
> > Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
> > Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: Steven promotes himself openly as a party operative. It is not offensive to highlight that.
> > Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
> > Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: Please. Grow a skin.
> > Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: I can't read into that even though there has been some ridiculous claims of payments and "personas" recently it seems
> >

 

villager

(26,001 posts)
13. So the FISA Act from 1977 is Kennedy's law?
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 11:50 AM
Aug 2013

On Edit:

You weren't citing Democratic Presidents in succession, but meant, I gather, Ted Kennedy and Jimmy Carter.

That's fine, but affixing Democratic names to what's become a rubber-stamping secret "court" stacked with John Roberts' appointees, isn't, for some of us, license to keep slumbering.

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
15. Google is your friend
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 11:54 AM
Aug 2013
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreign_Intelligence_Surveillance_Act

The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) was introduced on May 18, 1977, by Senator Ted Kennedy and was signed into law by President Carter in 1978. The bill was cosponsored by nine Senators: Birch Bayh, James O. Eastland, Jake Garn, Walter Huddleston, Daniel Inouye, Charles Mathias, John L. McClellan, Gaylord Nelson, and Strom Thurmond.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I've covered the history of FISA extensively so that people understand why it was enacted and the legal decisions around it, presidential powers, etc. http://steveleser.blogspot.com/2013/08/repost-transcript-of-nsa-surveillance.html and http://steveleser.blogspot.com/2013/08/full-transcript-for-my-segment-on.html
 

villager

(26,001 posts)
17. So are non-hasty replies
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 11:56 AM
Aug 2013

...if you read my revised reply.

You meant Sen. Kennedy, and not JFK, which I realized.

Still has become a rubber-stamp, John Roberts-appointed court.

Wonder what Ted Kennedy would think of it now?

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
119. Prior to FISA the executive's surveillance power was inherent and unchecked
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 09:20 PM
Aug 2013

The only limits being what could be introduced into evidence in court. So for stuff that wasn't going to court, anything went.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
126. The Church Committee and FISA (Bill Moyers)
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 09:41 PM
Aug 2013

EXCERPT...

The Origins of FISA

As chief counsel of the Church Committee, Frederick Schwarz tells Bill Moyers that the most fundamental lessons learned from the Committee include that "when you start small, you go big...When you start in a way that seems legitimate, it inevitably goes too far."

In reaction to the Church Committee reports pushing for oversight, Congress passed the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) of 1978, which established a secret FISA court responsible for issuing warrants for domestic wiretapping activity. The FISA court consists of seven judges appointed by the Chief Justice and who serve for seven years.

In December 2005, the NEW YORK TIMES reported that President Bush had authorized the NSA to eavesdrop on American phone calls and emails without obtaining a warrant from the FISA court. That revelation was met with consternation, and investigations, by many in and outside of the political realm.

In August 2007, a temporary amendment to FISA passed called the Protect America Act, which as President Bush explains, modernizes FISA by "accounting for changes in technology and restoring the statute to its original focus on appropriate protections for the rights of persons in the United States - and not foreign targets located in foreign lands." But the battle's not over yet — civil libertarians on both the left and right accused the Democratic Congress of giving in easily on wiretapping and several Members of Congress have vowed to readdress the issue.

Project Shamrock

One important program brought to light by the Committee was Project Shamrock — domestic surveilliance that was subsequently prohibited by FISA. Shamrock was a NSA surveillance program stretching from 1947 to the mid-70's that involved the copying of telegrams sent by American citizens to international organizations. L. Britt Snider, former CIA Inspector General and council on the Church Committee, describes the project he was tasked to investigate:

Every day, a courier went up to New York on the train and returned to Fort Meade with large reels of magnetic tape, which were copies of the international telegrams sent from New York the preceding day using the facilities of three telegraph companies. The tapes would then be electronically processed for items of foreign intelligence interest, typically telegrams sent by foreign establishments in the United States or telegrams that appeared to be encrypted.

Shamrock actually predated the NSA, which was created by President Truman in 1952, and began as a continuation of censorship efforts conducted by the the Army Security Agency during WWII. As Fritz Schwarz explains to Bill Moyers, the program began with benign intentions, yet, "if you have secrecy and lack of oversight, you're going to get abuse." By the time the hearings began, many estimate the NSA was analyzing 150,000 messages a month.

When Snider submitted his report to chief counsel Schwarz, he initially recommended leaving out the names of the three telegram companies since they could be subject to litigation and that "the companies had cooperated purely out of patriotic motives." Schwarz decided to leave the names in the report, even after repeated pressing by the Ford Administration that such disclosure would damage national security.

CONTINUED w/links, videos, stuff that gets forgotten by most everybody else...

http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/10262007/profile2.html

I haven't had a chance to explore all the info there, but it's something that may come in useful.

lark

(23,083 posts)
65. Have they approved the current interpretation?
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 01:21 PM
Aug 2013

I don't think so. Remember, this administration had a re-interpretation done that they have refused to share with even the Intelligence Committee.

Eko

(7,272 posts)
129. nice.
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 11:27 PM
Aug 2013

its always interesting when you have to deal with someone trying to prove a negative. Good smack down stevenleser.

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
64. I explained all that when I covered it. Not knowing the facts and history and commenting? Thats weak
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 01:19 PM
Aug 2013
 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
87. Oh, CAPS, well why didn't you use CAPS to begin with? That changes everything.
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 03:21 PM
Aug 2013

The fact that you assert what you have just asserted makes it clear that you don't understand this issue at all.

I've covered this.

http://steveleser.blogspot.com/2013/08/repost-transcript-of-nsa-surveillance.html

Response to stevenleser (Reply #87)

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
110. Since you offer no knowledge at all, I'll assume you are projecting. Besides...
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 06:16 PM
Aug 2013

there are no tool sheds in Manhattan.

SunSeeker

(51,550 posts)
132. I can't believe the vile shit slung at you by some DUers.
Wed Aug 21, 2013, 02:15 PM
Aug 2013

Shows the vacuousness of their argument. I'm glad at least that post was hidden.

Please keep posting on DU. I hope this sort of crap does not drive you out of here, like it has other rational progressives. We desperately need more people like you.

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
134. I think it's an expression of their feelings of powerlessness and lack of a voice
Wed Aug 21, 2013, 03:55 PM
Aug 2013

Ranting with an anonymous account on the internet at someone who is perceived to have a following or celebrity is the only thing that makes some folks feel like they are doing something.

People who disagree with me who feel empowered to act on their beliefs in constructive ways don't get nearly as upset.

 

villager

(26,001 posts)
37. I don't know. Kinda sad, really.
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 12:30 PM
Aug 2013

Some now exploited, misbegotten law had some Democratic names affixed to it once upon a time, so all subsequent critical thinking is therefore banned, no new questions ever need be asked, etc...

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
42. No offense
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 12:33 PM
Aug 2013

but I have to wonder, do you actually *READ* the posts you reply to, or do you just randomly go into a thread and shout NEENER-NEENER regardless of what the actual discussion is?

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
44. Yes the pre-Patriot Act FISA. Do you support Obama's use of the Patriot Act?
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 12:38 PM
Aug 2013

I think it should be repealed. But then I am an anti-authoritarian.

pansypoo53219

(20,968 posts)
46. BUT there was NO teevee gnews HUGH & CRY! no stirring of the sheeples fears as now.
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 12:43 PM
Aug 2013

where were the paranoid then?

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
71. Nope.
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 01:34 PM
Aug 2013

The issues of Domestic Spying and the collection of Metadata was ALSO big in 2006.
Here, I'll let Joe explain it to you:




Just because some people don't remember
is no reason to start rewriting History.

dawg

(10,622 posts)
80. You should post that clip as an OP. It pretty much says it all.
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 02:22 PM
Aug 2013

I wonder if he still feels that way? There isn't much he could do about it from his current position (other than complain from behind the scenes).

dennis4868

(9,774 posts)
7. Because...
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 11:34 AM
Aug 2013

Republicans are "great" on national security issues so they know what they're doing. Media therefore cannot question them.

 

Wilms

(26,795 posts)
9. "Conspiracy Theorists"??
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 11:40 AM
Aug 2013

Ya mean people who consider the possibility that two or more individuals planned and executed a crime, and even stranger, that aspects of the crime were covered up??

Where do people get such silly ideas? It couldn't possibly ever happen. Why are people so paranoid and, well, nutty?


 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
45. CT is a pejorative term over used by those that blindly follow their leaders.
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 12:42 PM
Aug 2013

Conspiracies abound especially in politics. Those that deny that have their heads in the sand.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
78. I recognized the sarcasm. Just saw an opportunity to put in my two
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 01:47 PM
Aug 2013

cents about CT. And I assure it's worth every cent.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
86. The story officially starts in 1981...
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 03:02 PM
Aug 2013

From Christopher Simpson, info on how Poppy started the big ball of wax when he pried control out of the bed-ridden Pruneface:



George Bush Takes Charge: The Uses of "Counter-Terrorism"

By Christopher Simpson
Covert Action Quarterly 58

A paper trail of declassified documents from the Reagan-Bush era yields valuable information on how counter-terrorism provided a powerful mechanism for solidifying Bush's power base and launching a broad range of national security initiatives.

During the Reagan years, George Bush used "crisis management" and "counter-terrorism" as vehicles for running key parts of the clandestine side of the US government.

Bush proved especially adept at plausible denial. Some measure of his skill in avoiding responsibility can be taken from the fact that even after the Iran-Contra affair blew the Reagan administration apart, Bush went on to become the "foreign policy president," while CIA Director William Casey, by then conveniently dead, took most of the blame for a number of covert foreign policy debacles that Bush had set in motion.

The trail of National Security Decision Directives (NSDDS) left by the Reagan administration begins to tell the story. True, much remains classified, and still more was never committed to paper in the first place. Even so, the main picture is clear: As vice president, George Bush was at the center of secret wars, political murders, and America's convoluted oil politics in the Middle East.

SNIP...

Reagan and the NSC also used NSDDs to settle conflicts among security agencies over bureaucratic turf and lines of command. It is through that prism that we see the first glimmers of Vice President Bush's role in clandestine operations during the 1980s.

CONTINUED...

http://books.google.com/books?id=YZqRyj_QXf8C&pg=PA75&lpg=PA75&dq=christopher+simpson+The+Uses+of+%E2%80%98Counter-Terrorism%E2%80%99&source=bl&ots=8klB0PzATX&sig=hi9DpE3qF43Oefh7iGn79W4jXQs&hl=en&ei=zAFQTeriBsr2gAfu1Mgc&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CBYQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=christopher%20simpson%20The%20Uses%20of%20%E2%80%98Counter-Terrorism%E2%80%99&f=false



Of course, those like you, Wilms, who pay attention know the unofficial secret state story goes back 18 years before then.

chimpymustgo

(12,774 posts)
113. Why do I find myself bookmarking ALL your threads? Thanks, so much for the history and perspective.
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 07:35 PM
Aug 2013
 

railsback

(1,881 posts)
11. Well,the hair on fire crowd needs some kind of justification for not caring until now.
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 11:46 AM
Aug 2013

Unfortunately, all of Greenwald's 'bombshells' have 'exposed' massive oversight and monitoring within the NSA. Would have been much
easier back in '06, before Obama took office and tripled the amount of oversight.

pnwmom

(108,973 posts)
12. Before Obama tripled the amount of oversight?
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 11:48 AM
Aug 2013

Where is your evidence for that? Or is this an evidence-free all-speculation-all-the-time zone?

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
120. Snowden provided the evidence for that
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 09:22 PM
Aug 2013

There are three levels of checks to keep US citizens out of PRISM, as opposed to 1 under Bush.

We know that because Snowden leaked the documents describing them.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
123. Gotcha. "Oversight" is one of those weird words that means its own opposite
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 09:30 PM
Aug 2013

So is "sanction".

"Because of the regulators' oversight, the company's actions were sanctioned" can mean two completely opposite things...

 

Savannahmann

(3,891 posts)
14. With over 2000 abuses that they are admitting.
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 11:50 AM
Aug 2013

God alone knows how many there actually were, I think we can say that oversight hasn't really tripled. I'm going to say that without proof, that is conspiracy theory.

uponit7771

(90,329 posts)
34. Doesn't matter what lane they pick the NSA will never ever be able to meet the standard of HOF
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 12:28 PM
Aug 2013

...folk

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
58. There are oversights
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 01:00 PM
Aug 2013

Looking at everything but actual terrorism, or does the Boston Marathon escape you? They knew these assholes were terrorists and dangerous, but did absolutely nothing.

You don't think people have the right to rage over that shit?

 

railsback

(1,881 posts)
51. ----asdlkfae'ek##--- oops, mistypedd… crap.. mispelled… darn
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 12:48 PM
Aug 2013

THAT is an 'abuse' that gets logged. Maybe go back and read that part.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
60. Boston Marathon
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 01:04 PM
Aug 2013

Russia: "This man is a terrorist
Chechnya: Man visited area.
International: "This man is a terrorist"
Boston: Man kills a 9 year old and blows the legs off of a person, and kills over 30 people.
US Statement: How could we have ever known this was going to happen.

Capt. Obvious

(9,002 posts)
18. Tripled the oversight - that's a lie
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 11:59 AM
Aug 2013

He quintupled the oversight!

It's led by Professor Droney.

?1360594247

 

RC

(25,592 posts)
82. Oversight now-a-days means to fly a drone over the site and take pictures.
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 02:35 PM
Aug 2013

For later "correction" of the situation down there. The first correction sometime involves more correction a short time later.
See how clean multiple murders can be?

How many meanings can "He quintupled the oversight" have?

Sorry, the graphic set me off.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
40. Let's talk about this "triple oversight". Looks to me like there is zero oversight.
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 12:31 PM
Aug 2013

Gen Clapper and Gen Alexander have "interpreted" to allow massive surveillance without warrants. Who specifically is overseeing those interpretations? And are those interpretations of the law and subsequent oversight available to the public?

Congress is supposed to have "oversight" but as you can clearly see from Sen Wyden's and Sen Udall's frustrations, that mode of oversight has failed.

The FISA courts are supposed to provide oversight. The judges are hand picked hard line Republicans not at all interested in the Constitution. They act as a rubber stamp for the hard line conservative run NSA. And they have admitted that they do not verify that the conditions of the warrants are met by the NSA. No one ensures that the warrants are enforced. And in at least one case, a warrant was issued that said the NSA could surveil anyone, anywhere, any time. One doesnt have to be a constitutional lawyer to recognize that warrant violates the Constitution.

It's ironic that some here that are so adamantly against the REpublican Party would embrace surveillance programs built, run, and overseen by hard line Republicans.

When it comes to believing Democrats Sen Wyden and Sen Udall, or Republican hard-line authoritarians like Gen Clapper and Gen Alexander, I choose the Democrats.

 

railsback

(1,881 posts)
95. Yeah, kills the Greenwald action movie coming out
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 04:37 PM
Aug 2013

which will end up on the shelf next to Atlas Shrugged.

Cerridwen

(13,252 posts)
19. Because there was still hope that a government headed by
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 12:02 PM
Aug 2013

and/or run by a Democrat might, at the very least, trim-back the excesses of all the alphabet soup of police agencies.

As many of us tried to point out at the time, a D behind a candidate's name does not denote concern for human rights. That of course, brought the "Democrats are NOT just like republicans" Abortion! Gay rights! Civil Ri....er, uhm....

Detention for guilt-by-association, it's "only meta-data," Greenwald's a poo-poo head, and other fun and exciting phrases are entering the New Democrat's vocabulary.

Oh, and did you hear? The ACLU has had 2 cases in almost 100 years of advocating for civil rights that can be completely misunderstood and selectively quoted and used to prove it is not a "liberal bastion" fighting for "liberals everywhere," and with massive amounts of links to fives of r/wers who agree with me. Well, of course it's about civil liberties and that used to mean it dove-tailed nicely with liberal policies and positions. But, I guess those were those old, "far-left" liberals of myth, and song, and r/w nightmares.

Meanwhile, aei and american conservative are being posted as reliable sources of factual information and educated opinion.

I can't decide if I'm sitting under the bus or down the freaking rabbit-hole. Hmm, maybe the bus is in the rabbit-hole?




Octafish

(55,745 posts)
88. The treatment afforded RFK, Jr. made me wonder if this was Parallel Hell Hole Bus Stop No. 9.
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 03:33 PM
Aug 2013
From DU in January...



Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy believed President Kennedy was killed by a conspiracy.

That's what his son and daughter, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and Rory Kennedy, reported in an interview with Charlie Rose last weekend in Dallas.



It's also what author and Salon founder David Talbot reported, when he called Robert F. Kennedy the "first conspiracy theorist" in 2007.

Here's why the news from Robert and Rory is so important:

The important issue is that he and his sister reported their father -- the president's principal counselor and the nation's chief law enforcement officer -- privately thought a conspiracy was behind the assassination of President Kennedy.

RFK called the Warren Commission report "shoddy workmanship."

Attorney General Kennedy knew about the Ruby-Mafia connections immediately, which is vital when considering the Mafia were hired by Allen Dulles and the CIA during Eisenhower's administration to murder Fidel Castro -- an operation which the CIA failed to inform the president and attorney general.

The interview with Charlie Rose marked the first time members of the immediate Kennedy family have voiced the attorney general's doubts about the Warren Commission and its lone gunman theory.


Those are the facts we learned Friday, Jan. 11, 2013. It's called history.



As far as I know, that Charlie Rose interview has never aired.

PS: The hatred some expressed reminded me of a conditioned reflex I have often heard when bringing up the subject of liberal politics in general, the Kennedys in particular, with very conservative individuals and groups over the last 40 years. To see it on DU has been saddening, if not eye-opening.

PPS: It's like a garage, there's so much room and everything. Not much in the First-Aid kit, unfortunately, besides an IOU from some guy named Milo Minderbinder made out to Kid Snowden.

PPPS: Very much appreciate that you remember those kind of Democrats, Cerridwen, the ones that cared about democracy, justice, peace, prosperity, equal rights, and a better tomorrow for all.

Cerridwen

(13,252 posts)
94. Remember them? Hell, I are one 'o them.
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 04:36 PM
Aug 2013

I was too young to be a hippy but I was plenty old enough to see the world wasn't what I was being told it was. My elders said one thing yet did another. I heard them complain about politicians over and over and over again then do nothing about them. My family is mostly apolitical. Except for various union memberships and union positions over the years. When it came to electoral politics they complained but were absent.

I was just about 5 when JFK was assassinated. My mother explained it as 2 children, mine and my brother's age, had just lost their father. I remember we went straight to her parent's house when she heard. I didn't quite get the words but the emotions were obvious. She needed to be with her parents. She was about 25. It was horrible.

Most of what followed was kept from me as I was "too sensitive" to the emotions around the unmatching words.

Back then, school reform was teaching to the child; unions provided the best jobs, pay, and benefits; poverty was to be addressed rather than those in poverty to be jailed; addictions to various substances was just hitting the criminalize or treat as medical conditions controversy; there was debate about incarcerating to punish or to rehabilitate (a re-tread debate from the late 19th century, I think); conservationism was a conservative concept; and that old Eisenhower had just warned people my parents and grandparents age about the MIC.

Then came...well, you know the history. The establishment Dems started more noticeably taking over the party. 1968 DNC. Some non-conformists started to conform because it was easier to go along to get along. Other non-conformists just faded away and stayed away from the party machinery and the electoral process. So much changed; so fast.

It reverted to the power-mongering status quo of the newly branded robber barons and the idle rich were described as hard workers.

The anita bryant promoted "moral majority" that was neither, morphed into the pat robertson "christian right" and was spewed all over the 700 club and it was neither Christian nor right though it was most definitely right-wing. The vast right-wing conspiracy was launched with full force and with talking points faxed each day or phoned in each evening. They started small; on the school boards and planning commissions and the gablers destroyed the textbooks. But, of course they never, ever, and don't you say they did, enter the Democratic Party as "Democrats" to undermine any and all progress the people had made in the arena of people's rights.

And history was gradually re-written to hide the multi-party system of the US; the early corruption and racism of the old Democratic Party was momentarily replaced by a Party for the People to shut-up the complaints; and on, and on.

1st Lt. Milo Minderbinder: Nately died a wealthy man, Yossarian. He had over sixty shares in the syndicate.
Yossarian: What difference does that make? He's dead.
1st Lt. Milo Minderbinder: Then his family will get it.
Yossarian: He didn't have time to have a family.
1st Lt. Milo Minderbinder: Then his parents will get it.
Yossarian: They don't need it, they're rich.
1st Lt. Milo Minderbinder: Then they'll understand.


By the way, I think we're at the corner of Parallel Hell Hole and Underthebus Rabbit Hole at Bus Stop No. 9.

Next stop...The Twilight Zone.

 

Coyotl

(15,262 posts)
33. Deja DU: Are ALL COMMUNICATIONS routed overseas to circumvent US law and the Constitution?
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 12:27 PM
Aug 2013

Not to mention: Are ALL COMMUNICATIONS routed overseas to circumvent US law and the Constitution?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x2245762

A question that should still be asked today!

 

Triana

(22,666 posts)
38. WE DID .....
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 12:30 PM
Aug 2013

.... I was here on DU when all this was exposed. No one listened. NOW they're listening.

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
77. This is all a part of the "Its not real" propaganda campaign.
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 01:46 PM
Aug 2013

I was here.
I remember.
The posts are in the archives.

Governmental Spying, the "Unitary Executive, dragnet monitoring by the Telecoms, 1st Amendment Zones, The AUMF, The Patriot Act, and Governmental Over Reach have been BIG issues at DU since 9-11 among those of us who were paying attention.

Those pushing the meme that "nobody cared in 2006"
are full of revisionist BS.

Even Joe Biden was on our side in 2006:


The above is about the danger of trusting the government with collecting "metadata"
....back in 2006???!!!
 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
47. Many of us fought for our fourth Amendment rights then as now.
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 12:45 PM
Aug 2013

Then we had a Republican President with Republican run intelligence agencies.

Now we have a Democratic President with Republican run intelligence agencies. The same programs and the same people.

 

Spitfire of ATJ

(32,723 posts)
57. Dont'cha know once Obama got in all of the Republicans in charge at the NSA were transformed,...
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 12:59 PM
Aug 2013

....into Teabaggers?

meegbear

(25,438 posts)
55. I was posting Glenn Greenwald's columns about it back in the day ...
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 12:58 PM
Aug 2013

Before it was cool to like him (you were supposed to hate him here because he called out Keith Olbermann).

Helen Borg

(3,963 posts)
70. Probably they did not have such
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 01:32 PM
Aug 2013

extensive capability back in 2006. But I vaguely remember a program that was shut down a few years ago because of public outcry, called TIA, Total Information Awareness. It sounds like one of the precursor to current systems.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
124. Sen. Obama warned about Patriot Act abuses. President Obama proved him right.
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 09:33 PM
Aug 2013

By Timothy B. Lee
Washington Post, Published: August 2 at 12:31 pm

In recent months, Barack Obama has forcefully defended the use of the Patriot Act to gather the phone records of every American. But before he was elected president, he had a very different perspective on the issue.

In December 2005, Congress was debating the first re-authorization of the Patriot Act, a controversial 2001 law that gave the federal government expanded power to spy on Americans. And Barack Obama was one of nine senators who signed a letter criticizing the then-current version of the legislation for providing insufficient protections for civil liberties.

The senators focused on Section 215 of the Patriot Act, which allows the government to obtain “business records” that are “relevant” to a terrorism investigation. Sen. Obama and eight of his colleagues worried that the provision would “allow government fishing expeditions targeting innocent Americans. We believe the government should be required to convince a judge that the records they are seeking have some connection to a suspected terrorist or spy.”

Congress eventually re-authorized the Patriot Act, including Section 215. A few years later, Obama was elected president of the United States. And under President Obama’s watch, the NSA engaged in surveillance suspiciously similar to the broad “fishing expeditions” Sen. Obama warned about.

The government has argued that records of every phone call made in the United States are “relevant” to counter-terrorism investigations generally, allowing them to obtain information about the private phone calls of millions of Americans — exactly the kind of argument Sen. Obama warned the government would make if the language of Section 215 wasn’t tightened.

Sen. Obama and his colleagues also objected to the lack of transparency and due process in Section 215. “The target of a Section 215 order never receives notice that the government has obtained his sensitive personal information and never has an opportunity to challenge the use of this information in a trial or other proceeding,” they wrote.

CONTINUED...

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-switch/wp/2013/08/02/sen-obama-warned-about-patriot-act-abuses-president-obama-proved-him-right/

Waiting For Everyman

(9,385 posts)
74. An excellent bookmarkable answer, but the question is silly as hell.
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 01:35 PM
Aug 2013

The past is water under the bridge, nothing whatever can be done about that.

It strikes me as a pretext for a finger-pointing exercise while Rome burns.

zeemike

(18,998 posts)
75. Well you have not changed Octafish
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 01:36 PM
Aug 2013

And I remember you back then...
K&R and thank you for what you have done in the past and now.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
79. Yes, many of us were called 'paranoid' especially after it was discovered that some Democrats
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 01:53 PM
Aug 2013

were voting for these Bush policies.

Imagine if Democrats all voted against Bush policies how different things might be. But after a while it was obvious that that was not going to happen, and when we would be angry at Democrats for their pro-Bush votes, the next time, THAT group would get to vote 'no' while another group took over the pro-Bush vote. Always with enough to make him successful.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
83. The Professional Paranoid
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 02:51 PM
Aug 2013
Uncle Jed, I told Mr. Drysdale I was going to be a double-naught spy!



The Professional Paranoid

Why NSA whistle-blower Russ Tice may be right.

By Patrick Radden Keefe|Posted Tuesday, Jan. 17, 2006, at 5:15 PM

If the congressional hearings on domestic spying have anything like a star witness when they get under way next month, it will probably be a 43-year-old intelligence officer named Russ Tice. Until last May, Tice worked at the National Security Agency, on what are known as Special Access Programs—the umbrella designation for "black world" operations that includes the Bush administration's warrantless eavesdropping. In December, Tice said he was willing to testify about "probable unlawful and unconstitutional acts" by the NSA, and he has since acknowledged that he was one of the sources for James Risen's original scoop in the New YorkTimes.

This appears to be great news for Congress: Because current NSA officials are likely to stonewall when asked about "sources and methods," arguing that even closed-session testimony could jeopardize national security, a chatty insider like Tice might save the investigation. But there's a catch. Shrill, twitchy, and Manichaean, your average whistle-blower often comes off as more crazy than confidence-inspiring. And when the whistle-blower happens also to be a professional eavesdropper—which is effectively to say, a professional paranoid—the weird factor can be especially pronounced. It may be tempting to write Tice off. But that would be a mistake. His intimate knowledge of America's surveillance apparatus might make him a little paranoid. In this case, however, it might also make him right.
Advertisement

Whenever a whistle-blower parts rank with a government agency or a major corporation, it's in the interests of the betrayed employer to depict the whistle-blower as unhinged. This skillfully plays on the public's preconceptions. If there's one naysayer in an institution of thousands, we're more apt to believe that she's nuts than that she's the only one who hasn't drunk the Kool-Aid. So far, the NSA hasn't responded to Tice. But if he holds forth before Congress about spying abuses, the agency will reply that he was dismissed last year after a pair of psychiatric evaluations deemed him "mentally unbalanced." In 2001, while he was working for the Defense Intelligence Agency, Tice became convinced that an Asian-American woman he was working with was a Chinese spy. He reported his suspicions and was told they were unfounded. When he transferred to NSA the following year, he continued to report his concerns to DIA. Learning of his persistence, NSA administered the psychiatric evaluations, which led to what is known as "red badge" status, or suspension of security clearance, a stigma that in Tice's secretive business can be professionally debilitating.

So, Tice's departure from the agency had nothing to do with the misgivings about domestic eavesdropping that he now professes. This isn't unusual. In the eavesdropping business, which relies for its survival on a code of silence more entrenched than anything the Mafia ever came up with, defectors seem to simmer in silence for years and then suddenly—and perhaps opportunistically—to blow their tops, detailing every infraction and violation they observed throughout their careers.

Tice's bid for credibility isn't helped by some whistle-blowers who have come before him. In 1988 a recently fired NSA contractor, Margaret Newsham, went public with an alarming story. Newsham had worked at Menwith Hill, the biggest eavesdropping base on the planet, located in England's Yorkshire moors but home to 1,400 American spies. One day, she said, a colleague handed her a pair of headphones and let her listen to a conversation in Washington. One voice sounded familiar and when Newsham asked who it was, her colleague told her the speaker was Sen. Strom Thurmond. But Newsham did not protest this violation of protocol at the time. She waited until she'd been fired and was embroiled in a wrongful termination suit. Then she blew the whistle with such promiscuity—alleging not only privacy violations, but also over-charging by contractors and sexual harassment—that she accomplished little. It didn't help that Newsham seemed like a textbook paranoid: She lived alone with a 120-pound guard dog named Mr. Gunther and once told a reporter she sleeps with a gun under her pillow for fear of government reprisals.

Another recent eavesdropper-turned-whistle-blower was Canadian spy Mike Frost, who was featured on 60 Minutes II in 2000. He made news by claiming that the United States and Canada were working together to wiretap civilians as part of the Echelon eavesdropping network. Frost related an alarming story about a soccer mom who ended up on a terrorist watch-list because she telephoned a friend to describe how her son had "bombed" in the elementary school play. But experts soon poked holes in this story. Frost tended to describe surveillance systems as all-powerful and omniscient; like Newsham, he sounded a little paranoid. And also like Newsham, he had held his tongue about his reservations until he parted ways with his agency for an unrelated reason. (In this case the reason was alcoholism—Frost's tell-all book reveals that he and his ghostwriter first met in AA.)

CONTINUED...

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2006/01/the_professional_paranoid.html

PS: Thank you, sabrina1. You have carried a lot of the load over the years, alone, on DU, and with our fellow Democrats. Words can't adequately express what your presence and friendship have meant to me. So, I haul out Jethro, my Doppelgänger.

Response to Octafish (Original post)

Blue_In_AK

(46,436 posts)
84. I remember, Octafish.
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 02:56 PM
Aug 2013

I have yet to figure out why people think it's okay now just because someone has decided that it's all "legal."

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
101. I notice something Octafish.
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 05:50 PM
Aug 2013

Going back and looking at DU1 and DU2...we actually had intelligent and meaningful conversations back then...certainly worth noting the tone here on DU3 is somewhat more hostile to the truth.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
105. DU can be a Truth Machine
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 06:06 PM
Aug 2013

Thanks for pointing that out, Rex. And no matter what side of an issue DUers were on, there was a respect for one another that comes from "knowing" that other person as a human being and not as a virtual opponent or stranger.

What gets me in looking back at the old threads is how they represent a virtual storehouse of information. Even if the links are dead, the names and dates are there with which to launch a search for more information. Using GOOGLE now turns up all sorts of important stuff that never gets mentioned on television, let alone in the classroom or at most American dinner tables. DU helps change that.

Something else: DU3 is noteworthy for the Time Wasters and the absence of many a good DUer. Glad to know you are not one of them, my Friend.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
109. Same here bro.
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 06:14 PM
Aug 2013

Somehow we are still here. I guess we never let the CT haters chase us off the site.

Neoma

(10,039 posts)
112. New generation has turned up.
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 07:16 PM
Aug 2013

New people are old enough to vote. They couldn't do much then, now they can do things.

That's just one point out of a bundle, but it's worth noting.

robertpaulsen

(8,632 posts)
114. Some sure did!
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 07:36 PM
Aug 2013
ABC Is Lying About NSA

EXPOSING Bush's Spying:Salon Uncovers New Evidence Spying On Americans That Could Rival WATERGATE

Breaking: Massive Domestic Spying Uncovered-TPM: Here's The Way The Whole Thing Works

Court Papers: NSA Warrantless wiretapping, "The Program", started pre-9/11.

Sibel Edmonds, NSA Spying, State Secrets and Kafka

READ!! -- NSA doc proves "Bush Authorized Domestic Spying BEFORE 9/11"



These links are all just from a brief perusal of my bookmarks from 2006-2008, prior to President Obama's inauguration. I haven't even looked at my 2005 bookmarks when the Risen story broke, nor have I looked at my journal, where I was yelling holy hell on multiple occasions.

On a side note, I noticed there were a number of links in my bookmarks on Wikileaks revelations regarding US government malfeasance from 2007-2009 that received pretty much unanimous praise. Isn't it interesting how the praise for Julian Assange's efforts to expose the truth were not so unanimous on this site after January 20, 2009? Some people here seem more interested in prioritizing party over justice.

Response to Octafish (Original post)

 

DeSwiss

(27,137 posts)
131. It was then (by some of us).....
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 11:39 PM
Aug 2013

...and we are again.

But many people didn't want to know then, and many don't want to know now.

Not knowing or acknowledging the TRUTH is denial of the first order and an indication of the level of FEAR that people live under.

And they've accepted this FEAR as ''normal.''

So they turn themselves into compliant sheeple.

- But they -- and ALL OF US -- will soon have to decide if we want to continue to live in FEAR or in TRUTH.

K&R

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Some have mentioned: Why ...