General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsOf Iraq, WMDs, Hidden Agendas(?) Intellectual Dishonesty, Education and The New York Times
"Note: I have read the Times consistently my entire adult life and I do not recall a single instance in which two writers wrote essentially the same article two days in a row on the same subject." - Raging Horse blog
Me neither. What's up on W43rd Street? They seem to have a " horse in this race." But it sure ain't Raging Horse.
And he's OFF:
>>>But two days after a sizable anti-Common Core rally in suburban Port Jefferson, Long Island, the venerable New York Times saw fit to publish not one but two editorials in two days, not merely praising the Common Core, but attempting to reduce almost all criticism of it to right wing nut jobs like Glenn Beck and the Tea Party. To make matters worse, the editorials were written by Times heavy hitters Bill Keller and, sadly, Paul Krugman. Both articles reveal Keller and Krugman to be completely ignorant of both the Common Core Standards themselves, their genesis, as well as to the ever widening and deepening political opposition to the entire billion-dollar Common Core campaign.
Nonetheless both articles are a massive public relations gift to corporate education reformers nation wide and you can rest assured they will make use of them. Moreover, by insinuating that most opposition to the CCSS derives from the far right, the articles are simultaneously an insult to the hundreds of thousands of educators from coast to coast who distrust or even loathe the Common Core and all that it stands for particularly the very real fear that intrinsically related high stakes testing combined with junk science testing will lead to their termination as well as to leading education scholars and activists such as Diane Ravitch, Lois Wiener, Gary Rubinstein, Leonie Haimson, Arthur Goldstein, Carol Burris, Anthony Cody, and Susan OHanian, to name but a few. Both Keller and Krugman seem oblivious to them all.
Neither seems to be aware of the fact that the Common Core has never even been field tested.
Neither writer seems to be aware that states were pressured if not coerced into adopting the Common Core because they were bankrupt.
Neither writer seems aware of the fact that, so great are the potential corporate profits, states were pressured into signing on to the Common Core before it was even finished.
Neither writer seems to be aware than prominent educators ( as opposed to politicians and billionaires) and have very serious issues with how developmentally appropriate the Common Core actually is and some are nothing less than appalled.
Neither writer, that is, seems to have a clue.
Whereas Kellers piece reads as if it were cribbed from Arne Duncan press releases with political slants provided by Thomas Friedman and David Brooks, Krugmans piece reads like a dashed off afterthought, seemingly composed solely to support Kellers would-be -arguments, and, highly uncharacteristic of Krugmans work, contains not a single original thought. For his sake, I hope Krugman, always the most prescient and intrepid of the Times scribes, was drunk when he wrote it so that he might be excused for employing such extravagant language such as entirely praiseworthy to describe a subject he clearly knows absolutely nothing about.
Note: I have read the Times consistently my entire adult life and I do not recall a single instance in which two writers wrote essentially the same article two days in a row on the same subject.>>> more at:
http://raginghorse.wordpress.com/2013/08/20/the-new-york-times-reveals-a-complete-ignorance-of-common-core/
LWolf
(46,179 posts)"The War on the Core." I am beyond sick of corporate spin, propaganda, and political manipulation.
Structurally, minus the bloodshed and the bombs, something similar is afoot with the plutocrats and corporate America ceaseless campaign for the Common Core. So here we are a decade later with that debacle having receded from American consciousness altogether, and here is the same Bill Keller pontificating about yet another war ( The War on the Core ) based on falsified data, widely exaggerated threats with equal ignorance and hubris.
Arne doesn't have to be anything but what he is, a corporate deform cheerleader, when you've got Gates and some others at the helm.
Whereas in Iraq there was falsified evidence, with the Core there simply is no evidence at all: the Common Core, like much of corporate education reform, is entirely faith based. It troubles Keller not at all that the deceptively named Common Core Starts Standards are yet another extra legislative imposition created and engendered by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation which has become the de facto US Department of Education with Bill, in the words of Diane Ravitch, the nations Superintendent of schools.
Keller essentially repeats a more conversational version of Common Core press releases including the outright lies that the Common Core was created with a broad, nonpartisan consensus of educators, convinced that after decades of embarrassing decline in K-12 education, the country had to come together on a way to hold our public schools accountable. Virtually nothing of the above sentence is true. If there were any educators present in the creation of The Core they were tokens, there to give cover for its corporate genesis. Keller seems utterly unaware of the fact that The Core is, at best, a vast taxpayer funded experiment on American school children based on nothing but rhetoric. Everything that can be said about it is pure speculation.
Who, these days, expects the truth?
Smarmie Doofus
(14,498 posts)He's not teaching the next couple of weeks. So he's got more left in the tank, I figure.
Compare that kind of productivity with the people he's critiquing: self-appointed ed "experts" who have NEVER taught.
And, who, it now appears very likely, will never do *anything* productive.
LWolf
(46,179 posts)but I'm back in the classroom setting up, so I'll be online a lot less myself. I'm going to have to get choosy about where to put what little time I've got once the students show up.
Smarmie Doofus
(14,498 posts)"Professional Development", ironically named by the ed czars who are consumed by politics.... not even "education", much less "professionalism".
But I'm not telling you anything you don't know.; although it seems like this system is a year or two ahead of yours down the road to oblivion.
Good luck with the new term.
LWolf
(46,179 posts)My first contractual day is next week, and there will be exactly one day without meetings with which to set up the room, get the computers, phone, projector, etc. working, and pull some plans together.
Since I can't do that in one day, I go in early. I know I shouldn't, but the stress of not being ready is worse than giving them the free time. So far, 9 out of the other 15 have been there with me this week.
I was there for 3 days last week setting up the room, so this week is all planning for the year.
Smarmie Doofus
(14,498 posts)No more.
Our Francesco Portelos... got accused of breaking Adm. Memo 4328.12erw... "staying in the building after 5:30 pm.deadline". They added it to a slew of bogus allegations to railroad him into a rubber room and ... if they get their way... out of education.
What really happened was this: he insisted that the School Leadership Team ( parents+teachers+principal) review the school budget. ( The teams are supposed to do that by law but no one ever has the courage to bring it up. The budget is where the "bodies are buried."
Principal predictably freaked. Things spiraled from there, resulting in one of the most remarkable websites in all of internet-dom:
http://protectportelos.org/
Oh those "reformers". It's just their way.
LWolf
(46,179 posts)they are only too happy to have us in there working for free. I think the system survives on teachers working outside their contractual hours. What I'd like to see is an organized movement that would really make a statement: NONE of us will work outside that contract. Do that for awhile, and watch everything fall apart.
Response to LWolf (Reply #1)
Smarmie Doofus This message was self-deleted by its author.
Smarmie Doofus
(14,498 posts)'Smatterwitcha?