Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Capt. Obvious

(9,002 posts)
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 12:07 PM Aug 2013

Scalia: High court shouldn’t ‘invent new minorities that get special protections’

Justice Antonin Scalia warned Monday that the Supreme Court is overstepping its authority on matters that should be left to Congress or voters.

Speaking at an event sponsored by the Federalist Society in Montana, Scalia said the high court should not intervene on issues such as wiretapping and “inventing” new minorities, according to reports.

“It's not up to the courts to invent new minorities that get special protections,” Scalia said, in an apparent reference to the court's recent decisions on gay marriage and federal benefits for same-sex couples.

Scalia said courts should not create new rights, leaving that to constitutional changes or to Congress.

Asshole

I wonder how he would have worded the dissent to Brown V Board Of Education and Loving V Virginia?

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Scalia: High court shouldn’t ‘invent new minorities that get special protections’ (Original Post) Capt. Obvious Aug 2013 OP
This whole "special protections" meme is such bullshit Ohio Joe Aug 2013 #1
but groups of minorities EC Aug 2013 #2
Damn those new minorities!!! The Orginal Constitution didn't need women, blacks, gays.....nt msanthrope Aug 2013 #3
Excuse me, Tony, but your pants are on fire MFrohike Aug 2013 #4

EC

(12,287 posts)
2. but groups of minorities
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 12:52 PM
Aug 2013

that have no protections are okay? Asking for the same treatment as everyone else is not creating special accommodations but equalizing them.

MFrohike

(1,980 posts)
4. Excuse me, Tony, but your pants are on fire
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 01:08 PM
Aug 2013

You were part of the majority in City of Boerne that denied Congress the power, under Section 5 of the 14th Amendment, to create new substantive rights.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Scalia: High court should...