Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTaibbi: We're Saddling College Students with Crushing Debt and the Govt. Is Acting Like a Profiteer
http://www.alternet.org/economy/matt-taibbi-were-saddling-college-students-crushing-debt-and-govt-acting-greedy-profiteer***SNIP
Matt, welcome to Democracy Now!
MATT TAIBBI: Good morning.
AMY GOODMAN: So, lay it out for us. What is this scandal, as you describe it?
MATT TAIBBI: Well, theres this overall connection between the sort of endits very much like the housing crisis, where there was a limitless availability of credit that drove housing prices upward and upward until finally they collapsed. We have a similar dynamic going on here, where theres sort of this bottomless well of government credit that keeps driving college costs up. And the difference here is not that its a market-based problem; its more that the government has limitless collection powers, so it has no fear of lending, and it continues to lend and lend and lend. And no matter how many defaults they get, they actuallysome have argued that they actually make money on defaults, and theyre projecting a profit of $185 billion over the next 10 years.
AMY GOODMAN: How do they make money on the defaults?
MATT TAIBBI: Through fees and penalties. So, even when people default, evenand its not clear exactly how high the number is of defaults, but theyre able to farm those accounts out to collection services and thefor instance, a couple of years ago the government projected a recovery rate of 122 percent for all forms of Stafford loans that were in default. Now this year its a little bit lower; its somewhere between 103 and 109 percent. But its still above 100 percent, which gives you an indication of how easily theyre able to collect from people in default.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 955 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (25)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Taibbi: We're Saddling College Students with Crushing Debt and the Govt. Is Acting Like a Profiteer (Original Post)
xchrom
Aug 2013
OP
the gov. and their owners, the banksters,. the 1% will happily "profit" from ANYTHING!
Civilization2
Aug 2013
#2
LuvNewcastle
(16,844 posts)1. K&R Good article.
Civilization2
(649 posts)2. the gov. and their owners, the banksters,. the 1% will happily "profit" from ANYTHING!
In some counties all higher education is payed for,. if you can make the grades, you can get a publicly funded education. Why is education in america a capitalist activity?
The U.S. economy is based on usury these days.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)4. Taibbi doesn't understand financial terms. Embarrassing.
http://febp.newamerica.net/background-analysis/federal-student-loan-default-rates
In short, he ignores the fact that it costs money to collect debt (duh) and the time value of money.
For loans issued in fiscal year 2013, the Department reports three separate measures of default recovery rates as a percentage of outstanding principal and interest at the time of default. These include a cash recovery rate that includes the principal, interest, and penalty fees that that the Department expects to collect on defaulted loans made in fiscal year 2013; a cash recovery rate net of collection costs that measures recoveries after excluding collection fees assessed on the borrower that the Department of Education must pay to private collection agencies it hires to recover defaulted loans; and a net present value recovery rate that measures recoveries net of all collection costs that is adjusted for the time it takes to collect an a defaulted using the time-value of money. The later measure is the most comprehensive measure of a recovery rate. According to the presidents fiscal year 2013 budget request, the federal government expects to eventually recover only 81.8 percent of the principal and interest due at the time of default on Subsidized Stafford loans made in fiscal year 2013 that go into default at any point during repayment.
Fiscal Year 2013 Estimated Federal Student Loan Default and Recovery Rates
Loan Type New Loan Volume ($ Billions) Lifetime Default Rate Recovery Rate (pre-collection costs) Recovery Rate (post-collection costs) Net Recovery Rate*
Stafford $32 23.3% 109.8% 95.7% 81.8%
Unsubsidized Stafford $66 16.6% 104.2% 90.9% 78.3%
PLUS $23 9.7% 103.5% 90.1% 75.6%
*Recovery rate net of collection costs adjusted for collection time using risk-free time value of money.
Fiscal Year 2013 Estimated Federal Student Loan Default and Recovery Rates
Loan Type New Loan Volume ($ Billions) Lifetime Default Rate Recovery Rate (pre-collection costs) Recovery Rate (post-collection costs) Net Recovery Rate*
Stafford $32 23.3% 109.8% 95.7% 81.8%
Unsubsidized Stafford $66 16.6% 104.2% 90.9% 78.3%
PLUS $23 9.7% 103.5% 90.1% 75.6%
*Recovery rate net of collection costs adjusted for collection time using risk-free time value of money.
In short, he ignores the fact that it costs money to collect debt (duh) and the time value of money.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)5. Kicked and Recommended! nt