General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSo, how many of you still think Snowden should "come home and face the music?"
I mean, it's what Gandhi and MLK and this guy named Bradley Manning did, right? Of those three, two were assassinated and one's doing 35 years. Now why would Snowden not want that? He must be a fraud.
CBGLuthier
(12,723 posts)Now if only Snowden could achieve what the first two did maybe you would have something resembling a point.
Downtown Hound
(12,618 posts)So personally I think he achieved quite a lot.
hack89
(39,171 posts)a year or so from now we will be able to say exactly what he has accomplished.
Downtown Hound
(12,618 posts)I blame Obama and his many apologists here on DU and elsewhere for that. Snowden gave us the information. What we do with it is not up to him.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)You don't have to wait a year.
hack89
(39,171 posts)unless you really believe that the national security apparatus gives a shit about public sentiment.
Lets wait until strong laws are passed and the NSA is actually reigned in before starting the happy dance.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)would have no reason to.
hack89
(39,171 posts)Downtown Hound
(12,618 posts)are you going to give Snowden a little credit?
hack89
(39,171 posts)Downtown Hound
(12,618 posts)It has to start somewhere.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)You should wish him well
HardTimes99
(2,049 posts)Fire Walk With Me
(38,893 posts)99Forever
(14,524 posts)... American citizens UNCONSTITUTIONALLY are the actual cowards. Of the lowest variety.
Edward Snowden is a hero that you will NEVER be the equal of.
JoeyT
(6,785 posts)Wait Wut
(8,492 posts)It takes courage. Edward Snowden is not Bradley Manning, Martin Luther King, Jr. or Gandhi.
Bradley Manning made mistakes and has not only accepted his fate, but has shown us all that he is a brave young man. I wish him the very best and hope that he gets out as soon as possible.
Downtown Hound
(12,618 posts)and give up his home. I know you probably think it's easy being exiled to a foreign country, but I doubt that it is.
Wait Wut
(8,492 posts)He was not 'exiled'. He had the choice to stay. If you think hiding under Putin's wing is more courageous than what any of your three examples did, well...that's your opinion. I disagree.
Downtown Hound
(12,618 posts)Got it.
Oh and, that's really fucking dumb.
Wait Wut
(8,492 posts)I just have more respect for true courage than you do. It's obvious you aren't prepared for a real conversation, so I'll bow out of this ridiculous thread of yours and leave you to your hero worship.
Downtown Hound
(12,618 posts)that you sitting safe and smug behind your computer will never have to face. Basically what you're saying is one literally has to give their life or their freedom to be taken seriously by you. And while I do respect the courage of those who choose to do so, I don't consider it a requirement to be listened to or valued.
Response to Downtown Hound (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Downtown Hound
(12,618 posts)DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)I'm anti-NSA, and so are you. I hate guns, and you seem to also. But your celebration of a child's death, and your "doubling down" when called on it is so toxic that I'll never do or say anything in support of you, ever. I know you don't care about that, but you most certainly deserve all the scorn that can possibly be heaped upon a person.
Here's the vile subthread I'm referencing, in which you said "fuck 'em", about a dead child and his admittedly moronic father. When called to task, you stated that the kid probably would've grown up to be a fascist gun nut, so the world was better off without him. I can't stress enough: I hate guns, I hate gun culture, and I want to see much more rigid gun laws in place. But I'll never be able to make common cause with you, because you've ceded your humanity to something hateful and ugly.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023497213#post7
Downtown Hound
(12,618 posts)DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)That's not set in stone, but I can't think of much more I have to say to you that would be useful.
Wait Wut
(8,492 posts)I'm speechless.
Downtown Hound
(12,618 posts)And while I don't wish violence or death on anybody, I'm not going to freak out if they bring it on themselves.
Rather simple actually.
Cha
(297,119 posts)Downtown Hound
(12,618 posts)that I've come to expect from his detractors.
bvar22
(39,909 posts)They called them "cowards" and "traitors" who should turn themselves over to The Crown for punishment.
They called them "cowards" for not fighting a set piece battle against overwhelming odds.
I call them "pretty fucking smart."
I also call Snowden "pretty fucking smart" for the same reason.
In the same situation, I would do the same.
Would you like to call ME a "coward" to my face?
You will know them by their [font size=3]WORKS.[/font]
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)if they were in his shoes. Of course they'll smugly assert they'd never be in his shoes, which really means they don't even have the balls to expose government crimes. Such "patriots".
Downtown Hound
(12,618 posts)I wonder how many of these people have ever even been arrested for minor civil disobedience?
Posteritatis
(18,807 posts)I doubt the list of DUers who took on the government in the kind of ways that would lead to (at best) an effectively permanent prison sentence is a terribly large one.
Downtown Hound
(12,618 posts)for protesting the Iraq War. And I very quickly realized jail is not fun. If I had the choice between fleeing to Russia or spending the rest of my life there, I would very quickly choose Russia.
HardTimes99
(2,049 posts)this nation great and what little hope remains for this benighted land.
Downtown Hound
(12,618 posts)But I am more than willing to admit that my contribution was rather small. Snowden risked way more than I ever did, contrary to what many here say.
HardTimes99
(2,049 posts)sacrificed nothing for his act of patriotism. Of course, that same group has no friggin' idea what the word 'patriotism' means, confusing it with either 'nationalism' or, worse yet, 'idolatry'.
Demo_Chris
(6,234 posts)The SUBJECT is the NSA.
Downtown Hound
(12,618 posts)But that's not going to stop me from pointing out the hypocrisy of his many detractors.
Demo_Chris
(6,234 posts)warrprayer
(4,734 posts)Were attacked and smeared as hatefully by those resisting change in their time as Snowden and Manning are right now.
polichick
(37,152 posts)I don't think less of him for leaving the country when it's clear that "liberty and justice for all" is a myth.
MjolnirTime
(1,800 posts)Hydra
(14,459 posts)Downtown Hound
(12,618 posts)CakeGrrl
(10,611 posts)As for Gandhi and MLK, please. They were silenced by individuals who hated their pacifist message and wanted to silence them.
Whether people here want to acknowledge it or not, whistleblower protections are in place.
Manning was not convicted of his whistleblowing.
Lots of lawbreakers would rather not go to prison. Snowden shouldn't have stolen from his employer and peddled the information outside the U.S.
Downtown Hound
(12,618 posts)because, from a legal standpoint, that's not an actual crime. There is no going to jail for "whilstleblowing." But there is for things like treason and espionage, and what Manning did was akin to whistleblowing.
I brought up Gandhi and MLK because many people here have trashed Snowden by saying that if Gandhi and MLK were willing to go to jail, then Snowden should be too.
What I'm saying is, hey, if they want to go to jail, great. But just because Snowden doesn't want to doesn't make him a coward and doesn't negate what he did. Going to jail shouldn't be a litmus test by people who claim to value freedom.
We should be fighting for the freedom of people who take a stand for truth and justice, not demanding their incarceration. I was raised to believe that's what liberals stood for, freedom and fairness. Not jail and punishment for standing up for the constitution.
MotherPetrie
(3,145 posts)and disgrace that Obama has brought on himself, his party, and this country by his embrace of NSA and the illegal police state it is working toward.
Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)Let's talk about Snowald, or China, or Russia, or the law, or the time line, or anything else we can think of to avoid the issue. Just SOP for the comfortably guilty.
These are the people that would have been cheering in favor of the Chicago police riots in 1968.
& R
HardTimes99
(2,049 posts)would have sided with Daley and his goons. I'm not enough of a pollster or statistician to even begin to try. But I think you're onto something. (Once the historical verdict was safely in that it was a police riot, they might have felt safe to condemn Daley. But not before.)
Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)I was lucky(?) enough to be at a very impressionable age and the child of dedicated hippies when all that was happening. The looks on the faces and the lust in the eyes of those people standing on the side watching the cops beat the hell out people offering no resistance or just trying to get out of the way was disgusting, and I'm sure, helped to form my rather jaundiced view of people.
All these years later people have forgotten that the hippies were always a small minority that usually banded together with other minority groups. As you say, after it was all over and the DFHs were shown to be right, everybody claims to have either been a DFH or that they supported the DFHs.
Here's an old joke/factoid I remember; Number of people who attended Woodstock; 500,000. Number who later claim to have been at Woodstock; 5,000,000.
And for the record, my parents were not at Woodstock.
n2doc
(47,953 posts)AverageJoe90
(10,745 posts)Snowden IS a fraud. He stole classified material, knowing full well that there was potential of endangering American lives. And then he fled to China, then Russia, and gave this info to BOTH nations. Manning, for all his many failings, at least had a conscience and wasn't trying to endanger American lives or screw with the Obama administration. Snowden DID mess with Obama's admin from what can be seen, and didn't give two shits about who might be caught in the crosshairs.
davidn3600
(6,342 posts)The NSA spying on Americans is illegal and unconstitutional.
Snowden blew that whistle and the government would want to punish him severely for that. So he ran.
What else did you want him to do? Tell his superiors? LOL! Good luck with that getting anywhere.
The problem with this is there is practically no oversight. Even judges on the FISA court admits that they can't police the NSA. They dont have that ability.
AverageJoe90
(10,745 posts)He wouldn't have given that info to our rivals if he had been.....
Downtown Hound
(12,618 posts)oh, and not to mention, Wall Street's, then he wouldn't have had to "mess" with the Obama administration.
gopiscrap
(23,736 posts)DevonRex
(22,541 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)He loves it there. He can stay. No sneaking back.
BlueJazz
(25,348 posts)...private prisons full of simple drug offenders ? The poor go to rot in a cell ...the rich and powerful go to Hawaii.
brooklynite
(94,489 posts)Downtown Hound
(12,618 posts)And if we're not going to jail war criminals and banksters, then we should cut Snowden a break.
brooklynite
(94,489 posts)Downtown Hound
(12,618 posts)Today, hmmm...I'm not so sure. Given that they stole my girlfriend's house by illegally foreclosing on it, I really don't give a shit if somebody steals from them.
Response to brooklynite (Reply #62)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Downtown Hound
(12,618 posts)It's about restoring our constitution and making it safe for people to tell the truth when our government gets out of line. If we don't have that, what we have is fascism.
Response to Downtown Hound (Reply #70)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Downtown Hound
(12,618 posts)And while I never said "take our country back," sure, we might as well do that too.
Blue_In_AK
(46,436 posts)If I were he, I would disappear somewhere far, far away.