Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

NuclearDem

(16,184 posts)
Fri Aug 23, 2013, 03:24 PM Aug 2013

Let's clear something up here. (Chelsea Manning and transgender)

Last edited Fri Aug 23, 2013, 05:46 PM - Edit history (3)

Sex - The biological development of male or female reproductive organs and gametes. Determined by XX or XY chromosomal configuration.

Gender - The behaviors and mental identification based on the masculinity/feminity binary. Social construct, learned behavior, and development of a male or female brain.

Someone of the male sex can identify with the female gender due primarily to the makeup of their brain, and vice versa. You identify people like this by the gender they identify with, not by their assigned sex.

So, yes, Chelsea Manning still has male sex characteristics. However, she identifies with the female gender. She wants to pursue sex reassignment therapy, not gender reassignment therapy. In her case, she has not completed transition yet.

That's literally as clear as I can make it. Gender and sex are not the same thing.

58 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Let's clear something up here. (Chelsea Manning and transgender) (Original Post) NuclearDem Aug 2013 OP
KnR. bunnies Aug 2013 #1
Message auto-removed Name removed Aug 2013 #2
It is all completely irrelevant. The MAN that released the info to Wiki was BRADLEY Manning BlueStreak Aug 2013 #3
No, it was Muhammed Ali. NuclearDem Aug 2013 #9
No it doesn't. BlueStreak Aug 2013 #18
Retroactive nomenclature. NuclearDem Aug 2013 #22
but bradley manning will no longer cease to exist. so how will you refer to this incident okieinpain Aug 2013 #26
Hillary Rodham no longer exists. East Coast Pirate Aug 2013 #29
If you are talking about her life before she got married, you refer to Hillary Rodham BlueStreak Aug 2013 #32
Currently, legally speaking, Bradley Manning still exists Tx4obama Aug 2013 #45
Excellent point. Hence my confusion that made so many people angry. kestrel91316 Aug 2013 #53
She has always been the woman Marrah_G Aug 2013 #56
I agree with the first paragraph but not entirely with the 2nd or 34d cali Aug 2013 #4
I understand what you mean, but I tried to keep it as clear as I could. NuclearDem Aug 2013 #6
Biology has FAR MORE TO DO WITH IT East Coast Pirate Aug 2013 #34
Actually, on second thought, that's more accurate. NuclearDem Aug 2013 #37
Cool. East Coast Pirate Aug 2013 #40
P.S. East Coast Pirate Aug 2013 #44
Some corrections - Ms. Toad Aug 2013 #5
Thanks for the info. NuclearDem Aug 2013 #7
This message was self-deleted by its author itsrobert Aug 2013 #8
Again, sex isn't gender. NuclearDem Aug 2013 #10
Correct sex is not gender itsrobert Aug 2013 #13
I agree 100%. n/t RebelOne Aug 2013 #24
Would you identify as female if your sex organs were removed? Lex Aug 2013 #25
Im going to start referring to you as "she" ok? bunnies Aug 2013 #15
fine with me itsrobert Aug 2013 #16
hmph. bunnies Aug 2013 #20
No, SHE. East Coast Pirate Aug 2013 #35
Post removed Post removed Aug 2013 #42
Hey, why stop there? East Coast Pirate Aug 2013 #43
Can you say "non sequitur"? whathehell Aug 2013 #47
You know exactly what I meant. East Coast Pirate Aug 2013 #48
First of all, that's a lame excuse for failing to communicate properly whathehell Aug 2013 #49
ECP is pointing that you used the same slippery slope argument NuclearDem Aug 2013 #51
I know what he's doing but I wasn't using the "slippery slope" argument & it was a bad analogy. whathehell Aug 2013 #55
Wrong- she is still a she before surgery Marrah_G Aug 2013 #57
Agreed LordGlenconner Aug 2013 #11
Basic decency sums it up. I agree n/t War Horse Aug 2013 #23
Very clearly stated. Highly recommend your thread. Hope it helps clear up misconceptions. KittyWampus Aug 2013 #12
From GLAAD's media reference guide: JackBeck Aug 2013 #14
Got it, post edited. NuclearDem Aug 2013 #17
I appreciate that you are taking the time to learn and be sensitive about trans issues. JackBeck Aug 2013 #19
Got it. Edited again. NuclearDem Aug 2013 #21
Can you give us a link to your definitions? michigandem58 Aug 2013 #27
The neural wiring that causes a person to identify as male or female comes together in the womb. backscatter712 Aug 2013 #28
Exactly. Chelsea Manning isn't a man who *wants* to be a woman. The Velveteen Ocelot Aug 2013 #31
I never thought about this that much and have a question. JDPriestly Aug 2013 #30
Sometimes there are chromosomal differences enlightenment Aug 2013 #52
This message was self-deleted by its author Cryptoad Aug 2013 #33
Oh crap, did NOT mean it to read like that. NuclearDem Aug 2013 #36
"based on the masculinity/feminity binary" snooper2 Aug 2013 #38
Just bigger words for "gender roles." NuclearDem Aug 2013 #39
K&R MotherPetrie Aug 2013 #41
Human beings are way more complex that we thought. ladyVet Aug 2013 #46
Thank you MadrasT Aug 2013 #50
(((Hugs)))) haikugal Aug 2013 #54
I'm all in favor of respecting Manning's wishes ... GeorgeGist Aug 2013 #58

Response to NuclearDem (Original post)

 

BlueStreak

(8,377 posts)
3. It is all completely irrelevant. The MAN that released the info to Wiki was BRADLEY Manning
Fri Aug 23, 2013, 03:33 PM
Aug 2013

If you want to talk about the security state and Manning's role in it, you refer to him as Bradley Manning.

If you want to talk about sex change treatments and that person's future life as a woman, then refer to her as Chelsea.

It is not complicated.

Muhammad Ali did not fight Sonny Liston in 1964. That was Cassius Clay.

 

BlueStreak

(8,377 posts)
18. No it doesn't.
Fri Aug 23, 2013, 03:57 PM
Aug 2013

And if you want to have a different opinion, that's OK. But I will not be bullied into using the language incorrectly. I will not be accused of phobias because I choose to use the language correctly. If you want to say it was the woman named Chelsea Manning who released those documents, that's absurd, but if it makes you feel better, go for it. I will not do that.

 

NuclearDem

(16,184 posts)
22. Retroactive nomenclature.
Fri Aug 23, 2013, 04:11 PM
Aug 2013

Same way you would call Hillary Clinton by that name even when talking about her from before she married Bill.

okieinpain

(9,397 posts)
26. but bradley manning will no longer cease to exist. so how will you refer to this incident
Fri Aug 23, 2013, 04:31 PM
Aug 2013

in the future. the whistleblower formerly known as bradley manning. lol, isn't life grand.

 

BlueStreak

(8,377 posts)
32. If you are talking about her life before she got married, you refer to Hillary Rodham
Fri Aug 23, 2013, 05:11 PM
Aug 2013

It is non-sensical to talk about college girl Hillary Clinton when that wasn't her name.

Really, what is so complicated about this? It has absolutely nothing to do with LGBT issues. It is simply a matter of chronology.

Tx4obama

(36,974 posts)
45. Currently, legally speaking, Bradley Manning still exists
Fri Aug 23, 2013, 06:19 PM
Aug 2013

His/her statement:

"As I transition into this next phase of my life, I want everyone to know the real me. I am Chelsea Manning. I am a female. Given the way that I feel, and have felt since childhood, I want to begin hormone therapy as soon as possible. I hope that you will support me in this transition. I also request that, starting today, you refer to me by my new name and use the feminine pronoun (except in official mail to the confinement facility)".

---

Until he/she legally changes his/her name in court then 'Bradley' is still his/her legal name.

And any court documents that are filed, etc (until there is a legal name change) he/she will still have to use Bradley as the name on official documents.

Just thought I'd throw that out there.

Marrah_G

(28,581 posts)
56. She has always been the woman
Sat Aug 24, 2013, 01:49 AM
Aug 2013

She just wasn't public about it.

What you are saying is hurtful, especially to our transgender members.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
4. I agree with the first paragraph but not entirely with the 2nd or 34d
Fri Aug 23, 2013, 03:34 PM
Aug 2013

It has not been established that gender identification is rooted solely in social construct and learned behavior or that someone of the male sex who identifies as female does so based only on experiences/events.

just a caveat

 

NuclearDem

(16,184 posts)
6. I understand what you mean, but I tried to keep it as clear as I could.
Fri Aug 23, 2013, 03:37 PM
Aug 2013

Adding a nature versus nurture debate wasn't going to keep it that way. However, yes, you're absolutely correct. There are biological factors that play into it as well.

 

East Coast Pirate

(775 posts)
44. P.S.
Fri Aug 23, 2013, 06:16 PM
Aug 2013

I like the end result.

Peoples comments have caused me to change my OPs. But they were mean and nasty about it.

Ms. Toad

(33,999 posts)
5. Some corrections -
Fri Aug 23, 2013, 03:37 PM
Aug 2013

There are multiple versions of chromosomal configurations beyond XX and XY. There are also mismatches between chromosomal configurations and reproductive organs (even without taking trans* individuals - in the most commonly understood sense - into account).

In addition - transitioning (the term preferred over reassignment therapy - regardless of whether you call it sex- or gender-) does not necessarily involve surgery at all. So pre-operative is not an accurate term because it implies that the ultimate endpoint in transition is surgery and, for some people, it isn't.

But thanks for trying to clear up some of the basics.

 

NuclearDem

(16,184 posts)
7. Thanks for the info.
Fri Aug 23, 2013, 03:41 PM
Aug 2013

I knew some of my terminology was probably outdated, but I did mean transitioning as including both hormonal and/or surgical.

Thanks for clearing that up.

Response to NuclearDem (Original post)

 

NuclearDem

(16,184 posts)
10. Again, sex isn't gender.
Fri Aug 23, 2013, 03:45 PM
Aug 2013

She identifies as female, and not having gone through transition to the female sex doesn't make her less of a woman.

 

bunnies

(15,859 posts)
15. Im going to start referring to you as "she" ok?
Fri Aug 23, 2013, 03:52 PM
Aug 2013

Sure, it might not be the gender you identify with, but I'll call you whatever I see fit regardless of what you want. Deal?

itsrobert

(14,157 posts)
16. fine with me
Fri Aug 23, 2013, 03:54 PM
Aug 2013

you have the right to call me anything you feel like. But never call me late for dinner.

 

East Coast Pirate

(775 posts)
35. No, SHE.
Fri Aug 23, 2013, 05:23 PM
Aug 2013

Genitals have nothing to do with it. Anyone who identifies as a female is a she.

God all mighty, is this place morphing into Free Republic?

Response to East Coast Pirate (Reply #35)

whathehell

(29,034 posts)
47. Can you say "non sequitur"?
Fri Aug 23, 2013, 06:36 PM
Aug 2013

I don't know what the politically correct position on bestiality is, but I'm damn sure

it doesn't have a thing to do with my point.

whathehell

(29,034 posts)
49. First of all, that's a lame excuse for failing to communicate properly
Fri Aug 23, 2013, 06:54 PM
Aug 2013

and second, even if I did "know what you meant" that doesn't mean it makes any more sense.

If you disagree, I'd suggest you educate me as to what respect for objective reality has to do with beastiality

because I have no idea.

 

NuclearDem

(16,184 posts)
51. ECP is pointing that you used the same slippery slope argument
Fri Aug 23, 2013, 07:12 PM
Aug 2013

That conservatives do when they talk about gay marriage, as in people wanting to marry and fuck animals.

No one identifies as a Bengal tiger, because BT isn't a gender.

whathehell

(29,034 posts)
55. I know what he's doing but I wasn't using the "slippery slope" argument & it was a bad analogy.
Sat Aug 24, 2013, 12:25 AM
Aug 2013

I'm not talking about homosexuality either.

My point is, if one is that much of a relativist, why confine it to gender?

There are people who imagine themselves to be all sorts of things they are not.

We call them ""delusional".

JackBeck

(12,359 posts)
14. From GLAAD's media reference guide:
Fri Aug 23, 2013, 03:52 PM
Aug 2013

Problematic: "sex change," "pre-operative," "post-operative"

Preferred: "transition"

Referring to a sex change operation, or using terms such as pre- or post-operative, inaccurately suggests that one must have surgery in order to transition. Avoid overemphasizing surgery when discussing transgender people or the process of transition.

http://www.glaad.org/reference/transgender

 

NuclearDem

(16,184 posts)
17. Got it, post edited.
Fri Aug 23, 2013, 03:56 PM
Aug 2013

Is the wording better this time? Honest question, I don't want to get it wrong.

JackBeck

(12,359 posts)
19. I appreciate that you are taking the time to learn and be sensitive about trans issues.
Fri Aug 23, 2013, 04:01 PM
Aug 2013

More people should follow your lead.

"In her case, she has not gone through transition yet."

She has begun her transition process with the announcement of which gender pronouns and name she prefers, so the only thing I would change about this sentence is that she has not yet "completed" the transition process.

Make sense?

backscatter712

(26,355 posts)
28. The neural wiring that causes a person to identify as male or female comes together in the womb.
Fri Aug 23, 2013, 04:45 PM
Aug 2013

Being transgender is like being gay - it's determined in the brain, not between the legs, and it's something that is not chosen.

Think about it. Why would a cisgender male want to cut his willy off or have hormones that make him develop female body characteristics? If you're a guy and like being a guy, why would you do that?

Chelsea Manning wants hormone therapy because she's a woman. Her brain is wired as a female brain, and she has identified as female since childhood.

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,601 posts)
31. Exactly. Chelsea Manning isn't a man who *wants* to be a woman.
Fri Aug 23, 2013, 05:06 PM
Aug 2013

She is a woman, but due to the way she developed before she was born (oversimplifying somewhat), she got a a female brain but not the body that should have gone with it. There seems to be a misconception that people get gender reassignment surgery because they want to be the opposite gender, while the reality is that they want a body that corresponds to their brain. And this is not a matter of choice, and we should show compassion and understanding for those who have this condition, sometimes called gender dysphoria, instead of making light of their situation or, worse, treating them like freaks.

Many years ago - the late '60s - one of my classmates, a biological male, was transgender, although no one knew it at the time. I knew him (and I'm using the male pronoun not out of disrespect, but because that's the only way I ever knew this person) pretty well, at least I thought so; I never dated him but we had the same major and hung around in the same crowd. Shortly after graduation he married another classmate, but then he left the state and I lost contact with him. Some years later, at an alumni gathering, I and the others in our "group" learned to our great surprise that he had had gender reassignment surgery. This would have been the mid-to-late '70s, when this was still quite unusual. None of us ever had the slightest clue that he identified as a woman, although he must have all along in order to have taken this drastic (and in those days, pretty radical) step. It must have been very hard to have kept up the pretense of being a man when in her head she wasn't.

Once the Internet became a thing I tried to find out what happened to her. Recently I was able to track her down on Google and discovered that over the years she has had a very successful career in an IT field. I am very glad for that - it must have taken a lot of courage to do what she did almost 40 years ago, and then take control of her life and make a success of it. When I read all these snide comments about transgender people I think of this former classmate and wish people would try to be more understanding.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
30. I never thought about this that much and have a question.
Fri Aug 23, 2013, 04:57 PM
Aug 2013

A friend of mine is pregnant and to be sure the baby is OK had some tests done. Though it is very early in the pregnancy, the tests showed the baby is a female.

Was that maybe some sort of DNA test?

I have known several people who changed their gender. They went through hormone therapy. If they had a DNA test, would it show their original sex or their chosen or developed gender?

How does this work in terms of the chemistry?

Response to NuclearDem (Original post)

 

snooper2

(30,151 posts)
38. "based on the masculinity/feminity binary"
Fri Aug 23, 2013, 05:49 PM
Aug 2013

Could you elaborate on that please?

Everything else you wrote makes good sense except that one part-

 

NuclearDem

(16,184 posts)
39. Just bigger words for "gender roles."
Fri Aug 23, 2013, 05:55 PM
Aug 2013

If someone's born with male sex characteristics, they're expected to act however their respective culture expects men to act. Same for people born with female characteristics.

The problem with that cultural view of gender and sexuality is that the issue isn't necessary a binary, but a continuum--no one is 100% male or 100% female.

ladyVet

(1,587 posts)
46. Human beings are way more complex that we thought.
Fri Aug 23, 2013, 06:34 PM
Aug 2013

We are an amazing construction, with wonderful variations of all sorts. It will be nice when society catches up.

MadrasT

(7,237 posts)
50. Thank you
Fri Aug 23, 2013, 07:07 PM
Aug 2013

Also -- some of us do not identify as male or female (or man or woman)

I literally consider myself to be "other" (nongendered or third-gendered)

This is a tough time to be transgender on DU - my heart literally hurts from reading some of the horrible swill that people are posting

GeorgeGist

(25,311 posts)
58. I'm all in favor of respecting Manning's wishes ...
Sat Aug 24, 2013, 07:35 AM
Aug 2013

but its clear every major dictionary disagrees with you.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Let's clear something up ...