In Syria, America Loses if Either Side Wins
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/25/opinion/sunday/in-syria-america-loses-if-either-side-wins.html?ref=opinion&_r=0
A man holds the body of a dead child after what activists claim was a chemical weapons attack in the suburbs of Damascus on Wednesday
WASHINGTON ON Wednesday, reports surfaced of a mass chemical-weapons attack in the Damascus suburbs that human rights activists claim killed hundreds of civilians, bringing Syrias continuing civil war back onto the White Houses foreign policy radar, even as the crisis in Egypt worsens.
But the Obama administration should resist the temptation to intervene more forcefully in Syrias civil war. A victory by either side would be equally undesirable for the United States.
At this point, a prolonged stalemate is the only outcome that would not be damaging to American interests.
Indeed, it would be disastrous if President Bashar al-Assads regime were to emerge victorious after fully suppressing the rebellion and restoring its control over the entire country. Iranian money, weapons and operatives and Hezbollah troops have become key factors in the fighting, and Mr. Assads triumph would dramatically affirm the power and prestige of Shiite Iran and Hezbollah, its Lebanon-based proxy posing a direct threat both to the Sunni Arab states and to Israel.