General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsObama speaks out against cellphone and computer tracking of dissidents
Apr 23, 2012 7:28pm EDT
(Reuters) -
President Barack Obama imposed U.S. sanctions on Monday on those who help Syria and Iran track dissidents through cell phones and computers, serving notice on technology providers that they could be held responsible for those governments' human rights abuses.
Obama's announcement underscored how democracy activists have used social media tools in protest movements across the Middle East, but also the extent to which authoritarian governments have used cutting-edge technologies to crack down on dissent.
"These technologies should be in place to empower citizens, not to repress them," Obama said in a somber speech at the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/04/23/us-usa-technology-rights-idUSBRE83M05Z20120423
Opsie..... sorry wrong country, wrong date, wrong just wrong.
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)Ichingcarpenter
(36,988 posts)Now about those weapons he sent to Syria....
Damn...... He's pro gun too
Yippie!!!!
panzerfaust
(2,818 posts)Voting for Obama was one of the biggest mistakes I have ever made.
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)guys get informational privacy concerns and we get the shaft? Apparently, someone needs a bit of self awareness. The bubble he lives in and the hypocrisy he hears from others as well is shaping his outlook so that he can't even hear himself anymore. Sad, sad, sad. For us.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)So I guess you're tortured daily with your decision for not having voted for McCain and Romney?
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)RainDog
(28,784 posts)to claim that voting for Obama was one of the biggest mistakes you've made if you base this upon the reality that you would have gotten a lot worse if Republicans had gained office.
the reality is that you are voting for social issues when you vote for a party.
the larger issues, economic, military, nat'l sec, drug policy, etc... are decided without your consent by both parties - this is nothing new.
I'm all for talking about the systemic problems that exist within this society that neither party addresses.
I find this sort of complaint ridiculous on the face of it. I certainly would not want to have had McCain/Palin or Romney/Ryan in office instead of Obama and anyone who claims that voting for him was such a big mistake is, by default, supporting the election of people more further to the right than democrats.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)Typical of him. Smart guy, but a totally wooden ear for irony.
Supersedeas
(20,630 posts)MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)It's bad for *other* people.
Hydra
(14,459 posts)And to think, he said that with full knowledge of what the NSA was doing.
Gotta give him points for irony.
Arctic Dave
(13,812 posts)Probably one of the best in the history of everything.
So he is able to speak with a forked tongue right to our faces. Nice to see we have that cleared up now.
Ichingcarpenter
(36,988 posts)in Holland?
burnodo
(2,017 posts)Holy Cognitive Dissonance, Batman!
mazzarro
(3,450 posts)So it is a condemnable offense if other countries do it. But is just fine and dandy if the US and Britain do same? Woooow!
treestar
(82,383 posts)And he can see the difference, where you can't or won't?
mazzarro
(3,450 posts)cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)People like me are just incapable of seeing the rhyme or reason to his actions.
GeorgeGist
(25,311 posts)means jumping on the bandwagon for the victory parade.
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)roguevalley
(40,656 posts)cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)Fearless
(18,421 posts)mick063
(2,424 posts)Political art projects from Herman Cain are funny. Sarah Palin's view of Russia from across the Bering Strait is funny. Rick Perry's short term memory loss is funny.
This is not funny.
This is a Democratic President, in his typical eloquent way, competing with the above.
I'm not laughing.
LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)from autocratic states like North Korea/China/Russia saying how the West needs more democracy? Remember how Americans used to laugh at that stuff?
Not so funny when it's our president!
totodeinhere
(13,057 posts)Americans.
socialist_n_TN
(11,481 posts)forestpath
(3,102 posts)nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)just like with Syrian and Iran:
RainDog
(28,784 posts)is a human rights abuse by govt.
I agree.
No matter what nation is doing this.
Ocelot
(227 posts)The 2 parties are both under his control now. Thanks in large part to the current empty suit.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)and this aided in the persecution of said dissident resulting from that dissident's political views and protected first amendment activities.
Thanks in advance.
mick063
(2,424 posts)A refresher on the crop seeded with mistrust:
Speculation will run rampant with secrecy. Tidbits revealed by the demon named Snowden reveal a few thousand "mistakes" per year.
We don't need any links. The infrastructure is in place. The lack of trust is in place. The Senator from Oregon has declared "Tip of the iceberg". The minority leader of the House has declared the magnitude greater than realized. The former President has declared Democracy to be bankrupt. A former Presidential candidate says the NSA has gone too far. The President himself has called for a review. All of them, Democrats.
I find it rather absurd to demand a link, but your loyal, stalwart defense is admirable. It takes courage to stand up to a tsunami.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)what he criticized Iran and Syria for.
As suspected from the "Who needs facts when you have convictions" crowd.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Facts shmacts.
Summer Hathaway
(2,770 posts)DU, on the other hand, is not.
RainDog
(28,784 posts)The reality is that left-leaning groups have been monitored by agencies of the U.S. govt. for decades. This is nothing new. This monitoring has taken place under both Democratic and Republican presidents.
Reason would indicate, based upon a pattern of action over decades, combined with the increased surveillance power and the increased fear of terrorist rather than state acts of violence within the U.S., that the U.S. govt. has, indeed, used their power to monitor dissent in this nation.
Reasoning requires someone to look at historical precedent when deciding whether or not something is more likely to be true than not, without actual documentation.
Reality includes operating within the bounds of what is more or less likely given information available.
Therefore, reality does support the idea that dissidents have been monitored during and after the time the statement in the OP was made.
The reality is founded on a lack of trust.
Perhaps from a few cumulative deeds.
I put the burden of proof on you to convince me that the NSA is benevolent toward American citizens.
link please.
If you cannot, I will reciprocate your "facts shmacts" line in advance.
Or is this still at the petty level of "proving" the President emulated Syria, in every detail?
truth2power
(8,219 posts)Therefore...
davidn3600
(6,342 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)I did for a friend. It asked "Use your current location?" so I figured "Sure, why not?" assuming it would be the city.
It pinpointed the actual HOUSE.
All of the privacy settings are off by default. It's like you are standing there waving your arms and jumping up and down buck naked to the entire intertubes.
The Internet is a VERY hostile place.
Need proof?
I'm here.
Coyotl
(15,262 posts)Had to do a double check!
sibelian
(7,804 posts)Just fuck it.
NealK
(1,851 posts)LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)Did he say it with a straight face?
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)We all live in Oceania now.
_______________________________
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2_%2B_2_%3D_5
MisterP
(23,730 posts)that he's "really" a librul (viz. the Blue Link Brigade, when it's not hunting down designated "journoterrsts" Doing All That He CanTM