Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSlate's Fred Kaplan: Obama's Guns of August
Obamas Guns of August
President Obama will likely bomb Bashar Assads regime in Syria. Here is the logicand limitsfor the presidents plan of attack.
By Fred Kaplan|Posted Saturday, Aug. 24, 2013, at 4:59 PM
Syrian army tanks in Damascus on Saturday. Obama may be considering a strike against Assad's regime.
Photo by STR/AFP/Getty Images
It seems likely that President Obama will bomb Syria sometime in the coming weeks.
His top civilian and military advisers are meeting in the White House on Saturday to discuss options. American warships are heading toward the area; those already there, at least one of which had been scheduled for a port call, are standing by. Most telling perhaps is a story in the New York Times, noting that Obamas national-security aides are studying the 1999 air war in Kosovo as a possible blueprint for action in Syria.
In that conflict 14 years ago, ethnic Albanians in Kosovo, an autonomous province of Serbia, were being massacred by Serbian president Slobodan Milosevic. President Bill Clinton, after much reluctance, decided to intervene, but couldnt get authorization from the U.N. Security Council, where RussiaSerbias main allywas certain to veto any resolution on the use of force. So Clinton turned to NATO, an appropriate instrument to deal with a crisis in the middle of Europe.
Advertisement
The parallels with Syria are obvious. In this case too, an American president, after much reluctance, seems to be considering the use of force but cant get authorization from the U.N. because of Russias (and Chinas) certain veto. The pressures to act have swelled in recent days, with the growing evidencegleaned not just from Syrian rebels but also from independent physicians groups and U.S. intelligencethat Assads forces have used chemical weapons, killing more than 1,000 civilians.
But where can Obama turn for the legitimacy of a multinational alliance? Nobody has yet said, but a possible answer is, once again, NATOthis time led perhaps by Turkey, the alliances easternmost member, whose leaders are very concerned by the growing death toll and instability in Syria just across their southern border.
The weapons that NATO usedand, more important, did not usein Kosovo are also likely to appeal to President Obama. Clinton was insistent that no U.S. ground troops be sent to aid the Albanians and told his commanders to keep from losing a single American in the fight, if possible.
more...
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/war_stories/2013/08/barack_obama_s_logic_for_bombing_syria_the_united_states_will_seek_to_put.html
President Obama will likely bomb Bashar Assads regime in Syria. Here is the logicand limitsfor the presidents plan of attack.
By Fred Kaplan|Posted Saturday, Aug. 24, 2013, at 4:59 PM
Syrian army tanks in Damascus on Saturday. Obama may be considering a strike against Assad's regime.
Photo by STR/AFP/Getty Images
It seems likely that President Obama will bomb Syria sometime in the coming weeks.
His top civilian and military advisers are meeting in the White House on Saturday to discuss options. American warships are heading toward the area; those already there, at least one of which had been scheduled for a port call, are standing by. Most telling perhaps is a story in the New York Times, noting that Obamas national-security aides are studying the 1999 air war in Kosovo as a possible blueprint for action in Syria.
In that conflict 14 years ago, ethnic Albanians in Kosovo, an autonomous province of Serbia, were being massacred by Serbian president Slobodan Milosevic. President Bill Clinton, after much reluctance, decided to intervene, but couldnt get authorization from the U.N. Security Council, where RussiaSerbias main allywas certain to veto any resolution on the use of force. So Clinton turned to NATO, an appropriate instrument to deal with a crisis in the middle of Europe.
Advertisement
The parallels with Syria are obvious. In this case too, an American president, after much reluctance, seems to be considering the use of force but cant get authorization from the U.N. because of Russias (and Chinas) certain veto. The pressures to act have swelled in recent days, with the growing evidencegleaned not just from Syrian rebels but also from independent physicians groups and U.S. intelligencethat Assads forces have used chemical weapons, killing more than 1,000 civilians.
But where can Obama turn for the legitimacy of a multinational alliance? Nobody has yet said, but a possible answer is, once again, NATOthis time led perhaps by Turkey, the alliances easternmost member, whose leaders are very concerned by the growing death toll and instability in Syria just across their southern border.
The weapons that NATO usedand, more important, did not usein Kosovo are also likely to appeal to President Obama. Clinton was insistent that no U.S. ground troops be sent to aid the Albanians and told his commanders to keep from losing a single American in the fight, if possible.
more...
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/war_stories/2013/08/barack_obama_s_logic_for_bombing_syria_the_united_states_will_seek_to_put.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 975 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Slate's Fred Kaplan: Obama's Guns of August (Original Post)
flpoljunkie
Aug 2013
OP
warrant46
(2,205 posts)1. Bombing For Peace
KG
(28,751 posts)2. Mein Führer I Can Walk!!!
warrant46
(2,205 posts)3. Ironic isn't it ?
Supersedeas
(20,630 posts)4. that imagery is still haunting