Test your general science knowledge!

[MoonRiver]

http://www.pewresearch.org/quiz/science-knowledge/

[darkangel218]

1. I got 11 out of the 13

[Javaman]

2. Got them all...

but it really wasn't all that tough a test to begin with.

[Volaris]

84. agree to both statements..

[dipsydoodle]

105. ditto

.

[PowerToThePeople]

3. there's an easy one.

13/13.

[Ohio Joe]

4. 13 of 13... I had to guess on the blood cell question though

I had no idea on that one but got it anyway

[Puzzledtraveller]

5. BRAINS!

[bowens43]

6. 12 of 13

[MoonRiver]

17. same here!

[fredamae]

56. Me too! n/t

[smirkymonkey]

133. Same here.

I got the laser question wrong. I kind of thought I would. Oh well.

[no_hypocrisy]

7. 12 out of 13. Feeling smug . . . .

BTW, how can only 59% of college grads NOT KNOW that electrons are smaller than atoms since the electrons are components of the atoms?

[lark]

75. Chiming in with my 12/13 peeps

We may not be brilliant, but we are smarter than the average bear.

[hlthe2b]

8. I expected it to be harder...

13/13

But, personally reassuring in a small way, though not when it comes to the general public's results...

[Ichingcarpenter]

9. This CSMONTOR test is high school level and better

its a much harder test than the elementary test you linked.

LINK:

http://www.csmonitor.com/Science/2011/1209/Are-you-scientifically-literate-Take-our-quiz/Composing-about-78-percent-of-the-air-at-sea-level-what-is-the-most-common-gas-in-the-Earth-s-atmosphere

[NuclearDem]

33. God damn, that was a tough one

44/50.

[PowerToThePeople]

42. dang.

Noscript caused it to mess up. I think I got 44/50. But on 3 of them i second guessed myself and ended up wrong. =) That was certainly a tougher test. The biology ones got me more than any.

[petronius]

57. That's a fun one - would have walloped my behind if it hadn't

been multiple choice...

[longship]

69. Missed one on that one 48/50

I changed my answer on the one about the tool making era from right to wrong. Damn!

And miscalculated the acceleration... Too much in a hurry.

[Ichingcarpenter]

78. I got a 46 and taught HS science years ago

but that was special ed. class....LOL

Its a pretty good test.in my opinion for a on line one.

[truebluegreen]

82. Whole lotta guessin' going on but 92%

Rudimentary Latin and Greek helped.

[Volaris]

94. damn 14 wrong, and I didn't cheat=).

looks like I need a refresher course in classical Physics lol.

[Warpy]

96. That was more challenging

I got 86%, forgot some of the math ones.

[dickthegrouch]

107. I only managed 38 on that one :(

13 on the first

[sakabatou]

108. 47/50

[DiverDave]

122. That WAS tough

Op test 13-13, this one 31-50

Man I'm not as smart as the other test indicated...

[Ichingcarpenter]

126. The second test is similar to what

a High school student should know

I did well because almost all the topics
we covered .........when I co/taught science as a special ed teacher back in the 90s.

I really had to think about the possible answers before I answered.

I still try to keep up on the latest science news which might have helped.

Yeah.... I thought the test was tough
but good.

The other test I thought was at a sixth grade level this is around a ninth
or higher level


I did laugh at the creationist number on the age of the universe for a possible answer.

[DiverDave]

130. I saw that too

I have never taken a chemistry class, would have helped

[JI7]

131. i did horrible on there

[Warren DeMontague]

146. 45/50

I'm a space nerd, so those questions were a breeze. But I slept through a lot of chemistry classes, I think.

[eridani]

149. This isn't entirely a test of scientific knowledge--it's also a test of knowing Greek

--and Latin. Lots of hints from their descriptions of where words originated that had nothing to do with scientific knowledge. I would have scored lower than 43/50 without that help. Physics and astronomy are weak points for me.

[Vashta Nerada]

154. I nailed the astronomy, biology, and geology questions.

I suck at physics.

[NYC_SKP]

155. I enjoyed taking that one and missed a couple. This 13 question test was pretty sixth grade.

Most sixth graders should know most or all of the answers.

Sadly, many aren't instructed well enough and/or don't have families or social lives that promote such forms of knowledge.

But ask them what Snooki's boyfriend's name is and....

[wild bird]

10. 11 of 13 correct.

Although, it wasn't a difficult quiz at all.

[War Horse]

11. 12 of 13

I always get the Nitrogen thing wrong. I answered Hydrogen.

[MoonRiver]

18. That's the one I missed too.

[bhikkhu]

26. That's why so many people pay extra to have their tires filled with nitrogen too

When people come to our shop and ask if we use nitrogen to fill the tires, I tell them "we use our own proprietary 78% nitrogen mixture"

[whopis01]

116. Now that's funny. n/t

[DiverDave]

123. Yup, that was..

eom

[hobbit709]

31. If it was Hydrogen, the first spark would be "The Sky Is Burning"

Hydrogen is flammable in any mix of air from 3-97%

[War Horse]

61. I know, I know. Makes it even worse :)

[yawnmaster]

137. And then there would be a Hydrogen and water vapor atmosphere...

The burning sky would only last as long as the oxygen lasts in the atmosphere.

[Fantastic Anarchist]

68. I missed that one, too, even though I know better.

I second guessed myself on it. Screwed myself out of a perfect score.

[Madam Mossfern]

148. Yup

I got that wrong too. Somehow I thought that Nitrogen was poisonous. I'm pissed that I didn't get them all right; it was a super easy test. I answered Hydrogen too because of the water thingy.

[truebluegreen]

12. 13 of 13

Pretty easy, common sense stuff.

[Squinch]

14. But, given the results graph, apparently most people don't know that stuff. Eek!

[FarCenter]

24. Even worse, they know the wrong thing

Only 12% of HS grads got the right answer to "Which gas makes up most of the Earth’s atmosphere?".

Which means that they have learned that some other gas than the right one is the most plentiful, since 12% is way below random chance.

They are misinformed, not ignorant.

[petronius]

50. The breakdown on that one was really surprising to me - a far lower

proportion of correct answers than any other question. I actually teach a class where that's a topic; I'll try to remember to do a quick survey this quarter to see what the incoming students really think/know...

[truebluegreen]

83. Yup, pretty scary.

[NuclearDem]

13. 13/13

Basically freshman-level college science questions.

[RC]

35. And that is sad.

I learned most of that stuff in grade school - In Kansas yet. In the 1950's.

[jeff47]

15. 13/13...And boy we need better science education in this country. (nt)

[Scuba]

16. 13 of the first 13, but missed on my sex and age.

[MoonRiver]

20. ...

[Scuba]

22. I always screw up the easy ones.

[Aerows]

19. 13 out of 13

Pretty easy questions, imho.

[Plucketeer]

85. I got them all too.

And like you, I thought they were pretty tame questions - and I'm a high school dropout!

[bhikkhu]

21. 13/13

The answers were all pretty obvious.

[Junkdrawer]

23. 13 / 13

Very easy test

[R. Daneel Olivaw]

28. For the 7 percenters.

And yes it is easy.

[cali]

48. stupidly easy. getting them all right is no test of scientific literacy

Much as I'd like to say that I'm well versed in the sciences, I can't make that claim.

[R. Daneel Olivaw]

60. Perhaps you are smarter than you believe, Cali.

I'd put good money on that.

[cali]

73. That's awfully kind of you to say, Daneel, but

I know the limits of my knowledge. Much as I like to try to keep up, my scientific knowledge is limited.

[Generic Other]

25. 12 out of 13

Better than I expected!

[R. Daneel Olivaw]

27. 13 for 13.

Thank you brain!

[tk2kewl]

29. 13/13

[hobbit709]

30. 13-13

[RKP5637]

32. 12/13 - screwed up the one about the most abundant gas. n/t

[CrispyQ]

37. Same here. --nt

[RC]

34. 13/13

Once upon a time a grade schooler could pass that test. Now - Many adults can not. But then, I went to school at a time they still taught science as facts and not theory from religious text.

[Art_from_Ark]

134. I'm not sure I could have passed that test in grade school,

back in the '60s, as my elementary school's only attempt to teach rudimentary science was Health and Hygiene in 4th grade. My first experience with an actual science class was 7th grade biology, which was taught on a 10th grade level, and which focused on learning scientific names for genera, kingdoms, and phyla.

[DainBramaged]

36. You answered 13 of 13 questions correctly.

You scored better than 93% of the public and the same as 7%.

i'M A 7 PERCENTer i'M A 7 PERCENTer LALALALALALALA

[Capt. Obvious]

38. 13/13

[heaven05]

39. 11 of 13

[LeftishBrit]

40. 13/13

[AngryAmish]

41. Medalist!

[Neoma]

43. I missed 3.

Not bad for someone who hasn't ever been in a science class...

[warrior1]

44. You answered 13 of 13 questions correctly.

Woot

[cali]

45. that was just ridiculously easy. 13 out of 13 and I am NO science whiz

[OffWithTheirHeads]

97. Seriously. The only question I had to even think about was am I male or female?

[Octafish]

46. 13 out of 13

And I did it fast.

[Sancho]

47. I knew all the answers...13 right!

[Katashi_itto]

49. 13 out of 13

[tridim]

51. I got the "nitrogen" question wrong when I was in Jr. High...

and felt like shit about it, so I always remember now.

At least it appears to be a common mistake. It tripped up 80% of the respondents.

[Jeroen]

52. 12 out of 13

Which gas makes up most of the Earth's atmosphere?
I answered CO2

[enlightenment]

53. Got them all (go me!)

Had to think about the atmosphere question for a bit, but most were easy. As a non-science person, I pat myself on the back (and prepare to trip over my temporarily inflated ego).

[demwing]

54. This theist scored better on the science test (100%)

than the average atheist scored on the religion test you posted earlier.

What's that mean? Not a god damned thing!

[treestar]

55. 11/13

There's nitrogen in the atmosphere!

[Boom Sound 416]

58. 13 for 13

[ismnotwasm]

59. 13 out of 13

To be fair it was pretty basic, and my first degree was an AA in science.

[Gothmog]

62. 13 out of 13

[Archae]

63. This test is fairly easy.

I got them all correct, but the statistic that only a tiny minority could also, is kind of depressing.

[amb123]

64. 12 of 13. Got the "Which is an example of a chemical reaction?" question wrong.

[BillE]

65. I got 12 of 13

Seems that those who missed one, it was the atmosphere question. I missed that one. Test was easy.

[Fantastic Anarchist]

66. 12 of 13 - I said Oxygen instead of Nitrogen ...

... which I really should have gotten right but had a damn brain fart. I over thought it.

All in all, these were extremely easy questions. I hope this is not what would be a litmus test for this nation.

[Cali_Democrat]

67. 13/13

[mike_c]

70. 13 of 13, straight up....

Of course, I'm a scientist and a zoology prof, so I'd be pretty embarrassed if I couldn't answer those questions. Interestingly, I thought the fracking question was more current affairs than science knowledge.

[RoccoR5955]

71. Meh! You call this a knowledge "test?!?!"

I could have gotten all correct in my freakin' sleep.
This is so superficial, it's not funny.
What IS funny is the small number of people that know what most of our atmosphere consists of.

Then again, maybe it's me. I have been a student of all sorts of science since I was knee-high to a grasshopper!

[cali]

77. No it's not just you. I'm no student of science and I found it

laughably easy. I'm also surprised that so few people know what our atmosphere is made up of.

[Spitfire of ATJ]

81. When you see what others got...

[Spitfire of ATJ]

72. Aced it.

You scored better than 93% of the public and the same as 7%.

[jtuck004]

74. The purpose of the test was not to measure scientific knowledge, but to provide ammo

for those that want to move us away from a more liberal education into Science, Technology, Engineering, Math curriculums, or STEM.

Most people that keep up with current events and watch Dr. Oz should have been able to get 10 or 11 of 13 right on that one. But the point was not that most people could learn the answer to the question that most people got right from a bottle of sunscreen. In other words, the point is not that it was "easy" or "hard".

The point is that it was designed to provide support for those who want to sell us on STEM training, so they can market the idea that we need to focus government money away from people thinking about how people may be manipulating them, away from questions that might lead them to think they are just working on a plantation, away from philosophy and the arts, and put it where it SHOULD go, where BILL GATES wants it to go, toward SCIENCY stuff.

We should do better in science, but we should also wonder why most people either don't know these things, whether it is really the educational system, or perhaps a culture that says adults can quit learning once they are "free" from "school".

I find it damn funny, in a non-funny sort of way, when propaganda is so obvious, and yet most everyone is consumed by how many right or wrong answers they got, as if they are still under the spell of the "schooling" they got, and have forgotten the promise that it should have been about education...

http://www.people-press.org/2013/04/22/publics-knowledge-of-science-and-technology/

[Maedhros]

91. While I share your sentiments regarding our need to be aware of how we are being manipulated,

I do not agree with demonizing science education.

"Science" is not rote memorization of facts and processes. A proper science education teaches the scientific method, which promotes critical thinking. I think we can all agree that more critical thinking is a good thing.

[jtuck004]

100. That thing flying over your head was the point. Thank goodness it missed you.

Philosophy promotes critical thinking. The arts promote critical thinking. Good science could, and sometimes does, but often times is narrowly constrained within the lab, and without the liberal studies people seem to find it hard to apply the lessons elsewhere.

Doctors are trained in science, no? Then why the hell did we have to pass a law to get them to reveal how much money they are being paid by big pharma, so we can know how it impacts the decisions they make to push pills on us, if the critical thinking they learned in science class was so helpful?

Why, since the science has shown us that, for many women, the damage from extra radiation may be more harmful than the likelihood that a breast exam will find something, are the people who PROFIT FROM breast exams continuing to push for more and more funding? Why are women who are being excessively irradiated on the off chance that something might be found somewhere not taking them to task for it, even when a few lose breasts or arms or legs because of mis-diagnosis or cells that suddenly go berserk because of the X-rays?

Science tells us that we are cooking our earth. Haven't seen that one keep a majority of people up nights. And it's not because they can't understand it, it's because they wilfully reject it - and no amount of science education is going to fix their motivation.

Nuclear studies involved a LOT of science, eh? Fukushima has been a screwed up earth and people-killing disaster for over 2 years now, and yet the people who are profiting from it continue their lies and deception, while scientifically trained nuclear engineers have died of cancer trying to work with it, despite all that GREAT science education.

You are correct. If life was like a fairy tale (the sanitized ones we hear now, not the originals) people would get a good science TRAINING, which would teach them to be sceptical, and they would measure and weigh and test and come to rational conclusion.

But it ain't and they don't. And science is not going to fix that failing of "EDUCATION", (which is, by the way, much different than training or schooling) nor are the bastards that are profiting from selling STEM to hapless people going to do anything out of the goodness of their cold, shrivelled hearts if it costs them a penny, regardless of the cost to others.

I'm not demonizing science. If I point out the shortcomings of the mechanic who tries to fix everything but only can own or afford one tool to do it with I'm not demonizing the mechanic, but the shortcomings of that approach when applied too broadly. That's just recognizing reality.

Science ain't the problem sister, (brother?), the people are. Or more specifically their human spirits are. And the way you reach the spirit, (not a religious thing, btw) is through art, music, dance, argument, discussion, and food. And probably beer. Not engineering.

[Maedhros]

113. Fair enough - I agree with you on most all of your points.

But I dislike pitting science against liberal arts, which it seems you are doing.

[jtuck004]

120. Not me, baby. It's the people with the money.

That's how I KNOW it's not me

It's a common story across the nation - they feel a funding pinch, so they up tuition, cut something out of the arts (they de-funded the ENTIRE theatre program at WSU - a college w/o theatre?) and then try an increase the number of wealthier students getting some aid because their parents can pick up much more of the cost that can those who have less money. There's a whole list nationwide, from grade school on up, where music, art, dance, and studies in the arts have just been slaughtered while being replaced with STEM curriculum, and they are trying to do even more. Ask most any teacher of art or music in public schools, or liberal arts in colleges, (Assuming the people still have a job) about it, and they will likely confirm that position.

Suffice it to say, there's only so many hours in a day, and the thought seems to be to get rid of things that might cause people to question the decisions others are making about their lives, in favor of classes that, in theory should cause them to be critical, but in reality make them more likely to be just employees, although making a little more than they can at McDonalds.

But the Rethugs are lovin' it, and some Democrats are leading the charge.

[Maedhros]

127. They did the same thing to natural science programs.

Biochemistry, molecular biology, physics: those things get funding. Geology, geophysics, zoology, botany, etc. not so much. The funding goes to departments developing patents/technology for Corporate America.

It's not so much liberal arts v. science as it is profit for corporations v. education for people.

[jtuck004]

129. That's true to an extent, but a decrease in funding is very different from closed, gone,

and dead. Because they still teach zoology for docs, geology, etc for oil and gas recovery.

But your assessment of the causes being more because of our masters, the corporations, and their need for profit at any cost, is spot on.

And that is exactly what the push for STEM is all about. Will those be the skills required for more jobs than now in 30 or 40 years. Almost without question, if we try to keep going forward as we have in past, for more growth, which creates wealth for the few.

On the other hand, maybe we need to be asking if there is another way to structure it, another way to live other than exploiting each other and the planet until one or both are destroyed, or we simply become a big round plantation, owned by a small few. We can probably still use those skills, even need them, but perhaps more for making life better for each other, maybe to encourage freedom and real Decmocracy, things that are slowly receding in the rear-view mirror as we push forward.

Asking those questions, or bringing them up so everyone can see the forest that is hidden by the trees, that's where those other classes come in. So I think it is worth people knowing that what is being pushed out upon them, like that test, has nothing to do with science, and everything to do with manipulation.

[Maedhros]

132. I agree with you that they are pushing bad education strategies meant to keep us from thinking

for ourselves.

However the same problems you see with basic education in arts and humanities, I also see in the sciences. Scientific illiteracy is a big problem in this country - it allows for climate change denial and "clean coal" bullshit to be peddled as reasonable positions.

The correct answer to this problem is to make sure than our citizens receive a well-rounded and comprehensive education, including liberal arts, humanities, mathematics and science. I can't justify putting less of an emphasis on any of those.

[RoccoR5955]

136. Hammer, meet nail.

You hammered that nail, quite elegantly!

I have been a student of science all of my life, but that's not all that I have studied all of my life. If it was not for a balanced education, one does not build the critical thinking skills needed to tell when science will harm or hurt us.
One needs to learn how to teach oneself, in matters of everything. If one is not willing to learn, and just learns to pass a test, then nothing is learned, except how to be a parrot.

[jtuck004]

140. Do you remember, or have you ever seen, the movie "Real Genius"?

Lazlo, former student, lived in a tunnel under the dorms. Chris was explaining to Mitch what drove Lazlo crazy...

"He loved problems, he loved the answers. But he thought that the answers were the answers for everything. All science, no philosophy.
One day, someone told him the stuff he made was killing people."

That's what philosophy is for, to make you ask those questions about the ultimate ends of what you are doing, who you are. Dance, art - it grabs at the spirit, pokes it and makes sure it is alive. Without those things we jump out the windows of the Apple factory in China.

Oddly, those whose pursuit is almost totally venal often have the benefit of those things, yet, for some reason it seems never to awaken their humanity or cause them to question that pursuit. If we knew why maybe we could yank that light back on for them.

Fortunately that only happens to a relative few, and those things make life better for the rest of us. What I can't figure out is, given that there are so many more of us, why we let them pull us around.

But yeah, you are spot on with your parrot analogy. It took me a long time, it seems, to finally figure out I had to let schooling go before I could really learn.

[Maedhros]

156. Here are results of an interesting recent study:

http://www.salon.com/2013/08/28/just_thinking_about_science_triggers_moral_behavior/

(And, I'm not arguing for diluting humanities and liberal arts education in favor of science. I am promoting the idea of holding both as equally important.)

[Maedhros]

76. A nit to pick:

Question 10 asked "Which is an example of a chemical reaction?" Possible answers were:

A: Water Boiling
B: Sugar dissolving
C: Nails Rusting

Of course, the answer they are wanting is C. However, all three are examples of chemical reactions.

"Water Boiling" is a phase change reaction, with H2O(l) --> H2O(v)

"Sugar Dissolving" is a dissolution reaction, with C12H22O11(s) --> C12H22O11(aq)

"Nails Rusting" is an oxidation reaction, with 2Fe(s) + 1.5O2(v) --> Fe2O3(s)

[Boom Sound 416]

86. Can answers 1 and 2 become the original chemistry after the change?

I think that's the distinguishing characteristic from answer 3

[Maedhros]

88. All chemical reactions are reversible under the right circumstances.

Put rust in an extremely reducing environment and it will revert to iron.

But you are correct - examples 1 and 2 are single-component reactions, example 3 is multi-component.

[Boom Sound 416]

89. What about burning paper?

The old 7th grade example

[Maedhros]

92. In a closed system it is no different.

C(s) + 0.5O2(v) <--> CO2(v) is the combustion reaction. A complicating factor from burning paper is that the product of the reaction (i.e. carbon dioxide vapor) is removed from the reaction location with the drifting smoke, therefore the reaction cannot be reversed. Also, burning paper in the lab occurs in a very oxidizing environment (i.e. the atmosphere); thermodynamics will drive the reaction toward production of carbon dioxide via LeChatelier's Principle.

Conduct the same reaction in a sealed vessel, and greatly reduce the oxygen fugacity (or increase the carbon dioxide fugacity), and it would also be reversible.

[Boom Sound 416]

102. Great answer

I'm going to look around the intergoogle for something on this

[Maedhros]

110. I should provide a caveat:

my answer was extremely simplified. There are many other factors at play, and a reaction that is theoretically reversible may not be practically so.

Thermodynamics is a harsh mistress. So is kinetics.

(Let's not even start with statistical mechanics...)

[madokie]

79. 13 of 13

You answered 13 of 13 questions correctly.
This quiz is a joint effort between the Pew Research Center and Smithsonian magazine.

See below how your results compare with the 1,006 randomly sampled adults that took part in our national survey and review how you responded to each question. For more findings from the survey, read "Public's Knowledge of Science and Technology."
You scored better than 93% of the public and the same as 7%.

13
Total number of questions answered correctly
These percentages only reflect the 1,006 adults that took part in the national survey; online quiz results are not included in the sample.
Your responses and demographic breakdowns
Below are the percentages of each group from the nationally representative sample who answered correctly during the telephone survey.

[MrNJ]

80. 13/13

It's sad that only 7% got them all.
The questions were stupidly simple.

[Hassin Bin Sober]

87. 13

[Warpy]

90. Yeah, I'm a nerd. 13/13

[Enthusiast]

93. Got 'em all right.

What do I win?

[MoonRiver]

112. This,

[Art_from_Ark]

141. You win bragging rights on DU

and a year's supply of press-on nails

[Enthusiast]

144. Okay!

[valerief]

95. 13/13.

[bluedeathray]

98. 13/13

But I found the sex question confining and assumptive.

[blackspade]

99. 13 out of 13 here

I didn't think it was hard at all.
Very basic really.

The low score on the atmosphere blew me away.

[Tierra_y_Libertad]

101. 13 of 13. And, I find science mostly boring.

Surprised myself.

[doc03]

103. I got them all right and I am 65 and a High School grad. n/t

[sakabatou]

104. 13/13

[GoCubsGo]

106. An interesting and somewhat comforting breakdown of the results.

For the most part, the younger the respondents, the more they know about science. Despite everything, it looks like science education here has improved over the years. The 65+ results are abominable, overall. That explains a lot, when you consider that the majority of teabaggers belong to this age group.

[livingwagenow]

109. 13 of 13. knr nt

[Blue_In_AK]

111. All correct.

[Go Vols]

114. Missed one

You scored better than 85% of the public, below 7% and the same as 8%.

Why did I pick hydrogen :/

[Blue_In_AK]

143. I made that mistake not too long ago on another test,

that's how I knew it was nitrogen.

[MineralMan]

115. Like most such tests, this one was far too easy.

13 out of 13 correct for me.

[Xyzse]

117. 13 of 13

Most of those are general knowledge.

[sdfernando]

118. This was a fairly easy test. 13/13 NT

[La Lioness Priyanka]

119. You answered 13 of 13 questions correctly.

[DiverDave]

121. 13 for 13

You scored better than 93% of the public and the same as 7%.

knew all of them.

[ohheckyeah]

124. You answered 13 of 13 questions correctly.

amazingly enough

[freethought]

125. 13 out of 13. Problems is

I scored better than 93% of the rest of the test subjects. That's a scary thought.

[Zorra]

128. 12 out 13, which means our country is in deep doo-doo, because if I scored

below only 7 percent of the public, we have a serious education problem.

I'm unquestionably science challenged, and that test only took about 2 minutes to complete.

[applegrove]

135. 13/13

[Logical]

138. 0 out of 13 n-t

[Vashta Nerada]

139. There's no excuse for not getting 13/13.

I learned all of that stuff in 7th grade.

[WillyT]

142. 13/13...

Thanks... that was fun.





& Rec !!!

[Warren DeMontague]

145. 13/13

not to be like, "easy test", but... easy test.

[Rhiannon12866]

147. I missed one!

And here I thought I knew more about science than I did religion, missed one on that test, too...

[nuxvomica]

150. What a poorly worded test!

"All radioactivity is man-made. Is this statement..." should be "All radioactivity is man-made. This statement is..." They're all phrased in that odd way, like the answer is part of the question. I got all 13 but it was very annoying. Science needs English majors.

[Turbineguy]

151. I'm in the top 7%

That's depressing. The test was pretty easy. It seems however that a lot of people know about anti-biotic resistance, which is something.

[SteveG]

152. 13 out of 13

way too easy

[yesphan]

153. Thanks to my

public school education, I got them all correct. It wasn't really a difficult test.