Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHow Depraved Money Hungry Media Is Distorting What We See, and Messing with the Country
http://www.alternet.org/media/jon-stewart-slayed-cnns-hack-filled-political-show-crossfire-and-now-its-coming-back-graveMoney, they say, is the mothers milk of politics. Also of news, sports and the rest of the entertainment industry. Three recent stories drive that home.
When Reince Priebus pressured Comcasts NBC to drop a miniseries starring Diane Lane as Hillary Clinton, the hostage that the RNC chairman threatened to snuff was the networks access to the 2016 presidential primary debates. When the NFL forced Disneys ESPN to pull out of a documentary about concussions jointly produced with PBSs Frontline, the leagues leverage was its deal with Disneys ABC to air Monday Night Football. And when Time Warners CNN hired Newt Gingrich for its exhumed edition of Crossfire, its motive wasnt political journalism in service of democracy; it was stunt casting in service of ratings.
On the surface, the fight between the GOP and NBC is about the effects of media on audiences. The partys presumption based on no evidence is that the miniseries would put Clinton in a favorable light, and also based on no evidence that the halo would translate into votes. But if a movie could do that, then John Glenn, heroically portrayed in the 1983 movie The Right Stuff, would have been the 1984 Democratic presidential nominee. The real issue here isnt the impact of entertainment on audiences, its the coup that took presidential debates out of the hands of citizens and handed them to party hacks.
Once upon a time, groups like the League of Women Voters sponsored the debates, and all cameras were welcome to cover them. But starting in 1988, the Democratic and Republican parties wrested control of the process. Since then, the general election debates have had an aura of patriotic respectability, but in reality theyve been run by the same folks whove earned an eight percent approval rating for Congress. The primary debates have become cash cows for the networks, interest groups and faux think tanks. Theyre spectacles that provide free media to candidates, attract eyeballs to sell to advertisers and offer co-branding opportunities to burnish the images of the evenings co-sponsors. The right question isnt whether NBCs miniseries would put a finger on the scale. Its why the hell a political party should be permitted to use the money that can be milked from the democratic process as a bargaining chip.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
1 replies, 579 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How Depraved Money Hungry Media Is Distorting What We See, and Messing with the Country (Original Post)
xchrom
Aug 2013
OP
Laelth
(32,017 posts)1. k&r for exposure. n/t
-Laelth