Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Baitball Blogger

(46,697 posts)
Tue Aug 27, 2013, 09:12 AM Aug 2013

O'Mara: George Zimmerman will ask state to cover $200K-$300K of his legal bills


***GROAN***

George Zimmerman, the Neighborhood Watch volunteer who killed Trayvon Martin, plans to ask the state of Florida to cover $200,000 to $300,000 of his legal expenses, his attorney told the Orlando Sentinel Monday evening.

Because Zimmerman was acquitted, state law requires Florida to pay all his legal costs, minus the biggest one: the fee that goes to his lawyers.

That includes the cost of expert witnesses, travel, depositions, photocopies, even that animated 3-D video that defense attorneys showed jurors during closing argument that depicts Trayvon punching Zimmerman.

Defense attorney Mark O'Mara said Monday that he would soon prepare a motion, asking Circuit Judge Debra S. Nelson to authorize the payments.

That motion, he said, "is in the works."

http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/local/trayvon-martin/os-george-zimmerman-we-pay-his-bills-20130826,0,7750164.story
105 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
O'Mara: George Zimmerman will ask state to cover $200K-$300K of his legal bills (Original Post) Baitball Blogger Aug 2013 OP
FYI, there's a large discussion on this matter in the Late Breaking News Forum branford Aug 2013 #1
Thanks appreciate it. Baitball Blogger Aug 2013 #2
I hope the scum jurors who acquitted him will be happy paying their fair share. MoonRiver Aug 2013 #3
You mean the 5 mothers Boom Sound 416 Aug 2013 #17
You got half of it KamaAina Aug 2013 #22
Clever Boom Sound 416 Aug 2013 #26
Why is their parenthood pertinent? etherealtruth Aug 2013 #81
It isn't really, just an observation Boom Sound 416 Aug 2013 #82
Mothers are just as capable of racism and stupidity as anyone else etherealtruth Aug 2013 #83
Thanks. I know that mothers are human Boom Sound 416 Aug 2013 #85
I was very unhappy to hear about this Xyzse Aug 2013 #4
It appears that there are quite a few FL laws that could use some serious review Blue_Tires Aug 2013 #14
Agreed Xyzse Aug 2013 #24
The law is designed to keep the state Boom Sound 416 Aug 2013 #5
It's a good law if you're a trigger happy gun nut with an itch to feel the thrill of the kill. MoonRiver Aug 2013 #6
And! Boom Sound 416 Aug 2013 #7
Happens all the time. MoonRiver Aug 2013 #8
It happens Boom Sound 416 Aug 2013 #9
A member of a minority group would not have skated through police processing Baitball Blogger Aug 2013 #10
Respectfully, what would have been the basis for probable cause branford Aug 2013 #12
I think we have come to the crux of the issue. Baitball Blogger Aug 2013 #18
Do you really believe that a black man would not have been subject to warrant? branford Aug 2013 #33
zimmerman was on adderol brush Aug 2013 #70
That really doesn't answer the relevant question. branford Aug 2013 #72
Unfortunately, you'll find a lot of ignorance about probable cause on DU.. X_Digger Aug 2013 #74
Discover this: the word is "breath" not "breadth" (nt) Paladin Aug 2013 #75
And of what group is Zimmerman Boom Sound 416 Aug 2013 #13
I live in the county. The fact that his father was a judge who was able to talk directly to Baitball Blogger Aug 2013 #19
It seems to really burn people up that Zim is not white Boom Sound 416 Aug 2013 #25
Not necessarily. Baitball Blogger Aug 2013 #32
To your last point Boom Sound 416 Aug 2013 #45
He spoke directly to Norm Wolfinger. Baitball Blogger Aug 2013 #48
Except that Boom Sound 416 Aug 2013 #50
Yes. You got exactly the kind of result one can expect from Seminole County, Florida Baitball Blogger Aug 2013 #52
And what group was Zim Boom Sound 416 Aug 2013 #53
Sounds like you're at the stage where you're grasping at straws, Baitball Blogger Aug 2013 #56
National Standards! Ha! Boom Sound 416 Aug 2013 #59
I've already answered all your questions. Baitball Blogger Aug 2013 #62
Thanks for calling me a racist on the Internet Boom Sound 416 Aug 2013 #64
This message was self-deleted by its author GreenStormCloud Aug 2013 #95
I said Boom Sound 416 Aug 2013 #97
Sorry. I missread your post.` I will delete my post. N/T GreenStormCloud Aug 2013 #99
... Boom Sound 416 Aug 2013 #100
He's white hispanic. Tommy_Carcetti Aug 2013 #78
You really believe that? Boom Sound 416 Aug 2013 #79
Yes. Tommy_Carcetti Aug 2013 #98
I thought his father was a magistrate a.k.a. Justice of the Peace in Virginia... Mr_Teg Aug 2013 #27
Are you kidding me? Baitball Blogger Aug 2013 #35
That's my point... Mr_Teg Aug 2013 #43
You obviously don't live here. Baitball Blogger Aug 2013 #44
Anecdotal "evidence" or not... Mr_Teg Aug 2013 #55
I have done my homework. Baitball Blogger Aug 2013 #57
I lived there for 20 years Boom Sound 416 Aug 2013 #65
I'm saying that you're underestimating how easy it is to over-grandize your position and titles Baitball Blogger Aug 2013 #66
That's fine. And I know all about the Boom Sound 416 Aug 2013 #67
You're not listening to anything I'm saying. Baitball Blogger Aug 2013 #69
Omg Boom Sound 416 Aug 2013 #71
Z's father was NEVER a judge. GreenStormCloud Aug 2013 #94
Many guilty people are found innocent, especially in FloriDUH. MoonRiver Aug 2013 #37
That's not what the law says Boom Sound 416 Aug 2013 #46
What's a "legal criminal?" MoonRiver Aug 2013 #49
Short answer, yes Boom Sound 416 Aug 2013 #51
"Zimmerman is irrelevant" Paladin Aug 2013 #29
Would you explain why he is relevant Boom Sound 416 Aug 2013 #36
You don't get to impose that sort of restriction on the answers you demand. (nt) Paladin Aug 2013 #39
And you can back up your responses Boom Sound 416 Aug 2013 #47
Wait, it seemed like O'Mara was happily doing this pro bono in bullwinkle428 Aug 2013 #11
The law only covers expenses, not legal fees. branford Aug 2013 #15
Did he claim was working for free Boom Sound 416 Aug 2013 #16
I guess I missed the part where Zimmerman claimed he would pay O'Mara bullwinkle428 Aug 2013 #61
He also knew Boom Sound 416 Aug 2013 #63
This and touring the gun manufacturing plant are in a list of: f-u(s). n/t UTUSN Aug 2013 #20
I thought Zimmerman took donations for his legal defense? KurtNYC Aug 2013 #21
You'd think so...But Florida stopped making sense to me years ago... Blue_Tires Aug 2013 #23
It would not be a double dip. branford Aug 2013 #28
I don't think he raised near enough to pay his whole bill. whoiswithme Aug 2013 #30
Casey Anthony did the same thing. whoiswithme Aug 2013 #31
And that makes it ok? MoonRiver Aug 2013 #38
It's the law. Jenoch Aug 2013 #60
Yeah, well, some laws are bad. MoonRiver Aug 2013 #73
If you were accused of Jenoch Aug 2013 #77
Funny Boom Sound 416 Aug 2013 #80
Let me answer that question with two responses. MoonRiver Aug 2013 #86
You seem to be assuming everyone who goes to trial is guilty as charged and Jenoch Aug 2013 #88
It is NOT the taxpayers' responsibility to refund everybody accused and acquitted! MoonRiver Aug 2013 #90
You can't sue a prosecutor for doing their job absent malice X_Digger Aug 2013 #91
So the wrongfully accused (or acquitted) lose more time and money? Throd Aug 2013 #92
Yes. Sometimes life sucks. MoonRiver Aug 2013 #93
What if it were you? Throd Aug 2013 #103
I would deal with it. Nobody wants to pay out large sums of money, but it happens sometimes. MoonRiver Aug 2013 #104
Apparently it is in Florida. Jenoch Aug 2013 #102
How does that answer the question Boom Sound 416 Aug 2013 #89
It's not a taxpayer ripoff Abq_Sarah Aug 2013 #101
Of course not..... whoiswithme Aug 2013 #76
Nobody should be surprised by this... Bay Boy Aug 2013 #34
If anything CNN should help pay, they made money off their coverage... HereSince1628 Aug 2013 #40
I'd have the NRA pay the lion's share, personally... Blue_Tires Aug 2013 #41
Yes, it'd probably also be consistent with their Mission Statement. HereSince1628 Aug 2013 #42
NBC will be paying the attorneys Boom Sound 416 Aug 2013 #54
Seems like a good law. NCTraveler Aug 2013 #58
I agree, the state shouldn't be able to drive people to bankruptcy uponit7771 Aug 2013 #68
I agree. Great law. All states should have it. I think they should pay fair lawyer fees also. n-t Logical Aug 2013 #84
I agree as well. n/t tammywammy Aug 2013 #96
rubbing salt in the wound of his victim spanone Aug 2013 #87
How did it add up to that much? treestar Aug 2013 #105

MoonRiver

(36,926 posts)
3. I hope the scum jurors who acquitted him will be happy paying their fair share.
Tue Aug 27, 2013, 09:38 AM
Aug 2013


Soooo happy NOT to live in FloriDUH.
 

Boom Sound 416

(4,185 posts)
82. It isn't really, just an observation
Tue Aug 27, 2013, 06:50 PM
Aug 2013

That by a large group of shall we day pro-Trayvon folks the narrative was: they are six women, five of whom are mothers. (I can't count how many times I heard that sentence in the sphere.

Now they are idiots, scum, racist or just a sample of the whole effed up community.

That's all

etherealtruth

(22,165 posts)
83. Mothers are just as capable of racism and stupidity as anyone else
Tue Aug 27, 2013, 06:53 PM
Aug 2013

Not dissing, mother's I am one and I love mine

Xyzse

(8,217 posts)
4. I was very unhappy to hear about this
Tue Aug 27, 2013, 10:09 AM
Aug 2013

However, perhaps this would be an impetus for FL to change their laws.

I mean, who else would have to pay that other than the Tax Payers in FL.
All I could say is, any time one of those punks shoot somebody they get sued like crazy.

If FL had to pay more than 4 of these a year for about that much, well heck... Who knows?

 

Boom Sound 416

(4,185 posts)
5. The law is designed to keep the state
Tue Aug 27, 2013, 10:11 AM
Aug 2013

From bringing weak charges against people and bankrupting them for having to prove their innocence.

On the whole it's a good law

MoonRiver

(36,926 posts)
6. It's a good law if you're a trigger happy gun nut with an itch to feel the thrill of the kill.
Tue Aug 27, 2013, 11:06 AM
Aug 2013

That law, plus Stand Your Ground, make it way too easy to get away with murder.

 

Boom Sound 416

(4,185 posts)
7. And!
Tue Aug 27, 2013, 11:12 AM
Aug 2013

It's a good law if you're forced to prove your innoncence because some pencil pusher in the state Capitol is trying to run for office saying he is tough on crime.

Would you like to go broke defending yourself when you know you're innocent.

Zimmerman is irrelevant

MoonRiver

(36,926 posts)
8. Happens all the time.
Tue Aug 27, 2013, 11:24 AM
Aug 2013

Besides, Zimmerman was guilty as sin, imo. He is NOT irrelevant. He is a monstrous example of the sick state of Florida "justice."

 

Boom Sound 416

(4,185 posts)
9. It happens
Tue Aug 27, 2013, 11:35 AM
Aug 2013

Which is why the law exists


Zimmerman is irrlevent unless you don't believe in equality under the law.

Baitball Blogger

(46,697 posts)
10. A member of a minority group would not have skated through police processing
Tue Aug 27, 2013, 11:40 AM
Aug 2013

without a drug test.

This is ALL about equality under the law,

 

branford

(4,462 posts)
12. Respectfully, what would have been the basis for probable cause
Tue Aug 27, 2013, 11:57 AM
Aug 2013

for a warrant permitting a drug or alcohol test?

He involvement in a shooting would not, by itself, be considered probable cause. Real life is not the movies or television. I heard no testimony that there was alcohol on Zimmerman's breadth, or he was acting erratically or otherwise displaying symptoms of intoxication. He also was responsive and fully cooperated with the police.

More importantly, in light of the evidence adduced at trial, do you believe that it would have altered the verdict?



Baitball Blogger

(46,697 posts)
18. I think we have come to the crux of the issue.
Tue Aug 27, 2013, 12:04 PM
Aug 2013

Zimmerman KILLED a human being. Get it? That's what everyone is all worked up about.

If a black man had killed a white man, he would have received a drug test. That's a given.

There is no point in discussing this with you further, because you either "get it" or you are a Zimmerman apologist.

 

branford

(4,462 posts)
33. Do you really believe that a black man would not have been subject to warrant?
Tue Aug 27, 2013, 12:31 PM
Aug 2013

If so, do you have any evidence or statistics to support your supposition other than righteous indignation?

Also, do you also really believe that anyone who doesn't agree with your version or beliefs about the entire Zimmerman sage is nothing more than a "Zimmerman apologist." Is every one of the vast multitude of legal, social, cultural and political issues, from gun rights and prosecutor discretion to self-defense laws and the right against self-incrimination, a simple binary proposition?

If so, you're right, there sadly is no point in discussing this matter further with you. It's a pity.

 

branford

(4,462 posts)
72. That really doesn't answer the relevant question.
Tue Aug 27, 2013, 03:09 PM
Aug 2013

If he was on prescription medication, it would be discoverable during the discovery phase of the proceedings, and if otherwise admissible and not unduly prejudicial, could be introduced by the State (or the defense if they believed it helpful) at trial. It would be a similar standard to that used to determine the admissibility of the THC in Travon's system.

However, in order to have probable cause for a drug test on the evening of the shooting, the police would have needed to offer a sworn affidavit explaining why they suspected Zimmerman of suspicious drug use on that particular evening. As I previously stated, I do not recall any allegations that there was alcohol on Zimmerman's breadth, or he was acting erratically or otherwise displaying symptoms of intoxication. He also was fully responsive and cooperated with the police.

X_Digger

(18,585 posts)
74. Unfortunately, you'll find a lot of ignorance about probable cause on DU..
Tue Aug 27, 2013, 03:36 PM
Aug 2013

.. and a lot of legal and forensic "knowledge" based on Law & Order, CSI: Somewhere, and similar.

Baitball Blogger

(46,697 posts)
19. I live in the county. The fact that his father was a judge who was able to talk directly to
Tue Aug 27, 2013, 12:06 PM
Aug 2013

Last edited Sun Sep 1, 2013, 11:10 AM - Edit history (1)

Norm Wolfinger puts this case over in the camp that usually get preferential treatment in these cases.

How long did it take for Norm Wolfinger to talk to Trayvon's father, I wonder?

Baitball Blogger

(46,697 posts)
32. Not necessarily.
Tue Aug 27, 2013, 12:29 PM
Aug 2013

I'm latina. I grew up in Latin America. Racism could manifest itself through the class system. If you had money and status, it was possible to find combinations of color and prejudice that would make most Americans knit their brows.

With the Zimmerman trial, there are old friends on facebook who have revealed this cross-over, which I never noticed growing up.

Bottomline, Zimmerman had resources through his father, that would not have been available to someone who was of full ethnic blood and had no special connections.

 

Boom Sound 416

(4,185 posts)
45. To your last point
Tue Aug 27, 2013, 01:11 PM
Aug 2013

So if is father was not white he wouldn't have been a magistrate? Kinda thin.

I may have missed this, but what strings did Zim's father pull in Florida. He couldn't even get jr a cop job in Virginia where daddy was a justice.

As to your first point. Yes. I see you what you're saying. I think most would agree.

Baitball Blogger

(46,697 posts)
48. He spoke directly to Norm Wolfinger.
Tue Aug 27, 2013, 01:22 PM
Aug 2013

I tried for ten years to get him to look into a conspiracy and fraud case that occurred in my city and he blew me off. Networks are everything in this county.

What you should be asking is, how much of this would have been buried if Al Sharpton hadn't given it national attention? The answer: All of it.

Baitball Blogger

(46,697 posts)
52. Yes. You got exactly the kind of result one can expect from Seminole County, Florida
Tue Aug 27, 2013, 01:39 PM
Aug 2013

when someone stalks and kills a member of a minority group.

Finally, we agree on something.

 

Boom Sound 416

(4,185 posts)
53. And what group was Zim
Tue Aug 27, 2013, 01:53 PM
Aug 2013

In fact based on your reasoning. Florida tax payers should not flip the bill, but perhaps sharpton should.

Baitball Blogger

(46,697 posts)
56. Sounds like you're at the stage where you're grasping at straws,
Tue Aug 27, 2013, 02:01 PM
Aug 2013

trying to frame my opinion in a way that fits your agenda.

I stated my opinion. This is a good ole boy county. In my city they routinely ignore critical tenets of the Fourteenth Amendment in order to buy loyalties to push their agenda. So, if they are accustom to being judge, jury and executioners when it comes to equal protection and due process of law, why would anyone expect anything in our court system to meet up to national standards?

 

Boom Sound 416

(4,185 posts)
59. National Standards! Ha!
Tue Aug 27, 2013, 02:09 PM
Aug 2013

Where are they, Americaville?

When did the other 49 states stop having race inequality and straight up race crimes

Furthermore, you said, "when someone stalks and kills a member of a minority group"

I asked you of what group is Zim's membership. I left the goal posts exactly where you pushed them.

Please don't tell me I'm grasping at straws

And what's my agenda?

Baitball Blogger

(46,697 posts)
62. I've already answered all your questions.
Tue Aug 27, 2013, 02:13 PM
Aug 2013

You just do not want to accept the fact that there are two Americas. The laws do not apply equally to everyone, and those of us who are continually discriminated against are going to continue to point that out to you.

 

Boom Sound 416

(4,185 posts)
64. Thanks for calling me a racist on the Internet
Tue Aug 27, 2013, 02:19 PM
Aug 2013

I know as well as anyone there are two America's.


What's hypocritical is the two sets of legal standards you are arguing FOR.

Response to Boom Sound 416 (Reply #45)

 

Boom Sound 416

(4,185 posts)
97. I said
Tue Aug 27, 2013, 09:45 PM
Aug 2013

"I may have missed this, but what strings did Zim's father pull in Florida. He couldn't even get jr a cop job in Virginia where daddy was a justice."

---
I think missed something with your response.

Tommy_Carcetti

(43,157 posts)
78. He's white hispanic.
Tue Aug 27, 2013, 05:55 PM
Aug 2013

It's a recognized census classification.

The frickin' Pope is a white Hispanic, and he's lilly white.

It's the right who is obsessing that Zimmerman was Hispanic and supposedly not white, and apparently to them that means he was incapable of racially profiling a black teenager.

 

Mr_Teg

(47 posts)
27. I thought his father was a magistrate a.k.a. Justice of the Peace in Virginia...
Tue Aug 27, 2013, 12:19 PM
Aug 2013

Why would he have pull in Florida?

Baitball Blogger

(46,697 posts)
35. Are you kidding me?
Tue Aug 27, 2013, 12:33 PM
Aug 2013

In Florida people pull rank. Literally. It is not uncommon to find retired military officers around here who expect you to take them at their word. If you question them they will look at you like you just walked out of a 2 star mobile home park.

Baitball Blogger

(46,697 posts)
44. You obviously don't live here.
Tue Aug 27, 2013, 01:02 PM
Aug 2013

This is a retirement mecca combined with a good ole boy culture. There's an artificial merit system that you will not see unless you've lived here a while. The fact that his dad was a retired magistrate would have given him access into these circles. That access benefited Zimmerman. It's an option that most minorities do not have.

 

Boom Sound 416

(4,185 posts)
65. I lived there for 20 years
Tue Aug 27, 2013, 02:33 PM
Aug 2013

And you're telling me that some flimsy magistrate from where-in-the-fuck, Virginia can waltz into the SA's and office and what? Show him the "white" badge and the SA will say case closed, nothing to see here.

Just like that.

Baitball Blogger

(46,697 posts)
66. I'm saying that you're underestimating how easy it is to over-grandize your position and titles
Tue Aug 27, 2013, 02:35 PM
Aug 2013

in this county.

 

Boom Sound 416

(4,185 posts)
67. That's fine. And I know all about the
Tue Aug 27, 2013, 02:40 PM
Aug 2013

North Florida good ole boy network. Believe you me.

But membership is not solely based on race. And if daddy had any real pull it would have never gone to trial. Tallahassee and Jacksonville are not exactly bastions of progressive thinking and it's from those cities came the charges and special prosecutor. Seminole and broward are far, far more liberal than Leon and Duval

Baitball Blogger

(46,697 posts)
69. You're not listening to anything I'm saying.
Tue Aug 27, 2013, 02:46 PM
Aug 2013

This is Central Florida, not North Florida. There is a good ole boy network here. They maintain power by donating very graciously and strategically to campaigns for candidates who are running for governor.

The Zimmerman case went to court because Al Sharpton's presence put it on the national agenda. Otherwise, it would never have gone to trial.

Seminole County is not Liberal. Liberals are ostracized because we actually know how to read legal documents.

 

Boom Sound 416

(4,185 posts)
71. Omg
Tue Aug 27, 2013, 03:02 PM
Aug 2013

Are You really going to tell me about the subtleties of "the good ole boy network" between jax and greater Orlando or greater Daytona.



Spirited discussion. Gotta take a break

GreenStormCloud

(12,072 posts)
94. Z's father was NEVER a judge.
Tue Aug 27, 2013, 09:35 PM
Aug 2013

That is a DU myth that refuses to die. Some years ago Virginia revised their Justice of the Peace system and called the new official who did the same duties a "Magistrate. Z's father was a Magistrate in Virginia for a few year. That is the same as being a Justice of the Peace in other states. A Virginia "Justice of the Peace" (Magistrate) is going to have ZERO influence in Florida.

MoonRiver

(36,926 posts)
37. Many guilty people are found innocent, especially in FloriDUH.
Tue Aug 27, 2013, 12:39 PM
Aug 2013

Why should taxpayers help criminals get off Scott free?

MoonRiver

(36,926 posts)
49. What's a "legal criminal?"
Tue Aug 27, 2013, 01:23 PM
Aug 2013

Edit: Zim was a guilty criminal who wasn't convicted. Is that what you are referring to?

bullwinkle428

(20,629 posts)
11. Wait, it seemed like O'Mara was happily doing this pro bono in
Tue Aug 27, 2013, 11:45 AM
Aug 2013

the beginning, thrilled with all of the publicity he was getting!

I guess he's figuring out the old chestnut about "no such thing as 'bad' publicity" ain't always all it's cracked up to be!

 

branford

(4,462 posts)
15. The law only covers expenses, not legal fees.
Tue Aug 27, 2013, 12:00 PM
Aug 2013

In any event, why shouldn't Zimmerman or his counsel seek reimbursement of their expenses?

If it was you, or your attorney, wouldn't you avail yourself of the law?

bullwinkle428

(20,629 posts)
61. I guess I missed the part where Zimmerman claimed he would pay O'Mara
Tue Aug 27, 2013, 02:12 PM
Aug 2013

using the money tree growing in his backyard.

C'MON, SON!! He knew damn well that Big Z didn't have two quarters to rub together!

 

Boom Sound 416

(4,185 posts)
63. He also knew
Tue Aug 27, 2013, 02:16 PM
Aug 2013

There would be a legal defense fund and it was probably Omara's idea to sue NBC for Defamation...Son

KurtNYC

(14,549 posts)
21. I thought Zimmerman took donations for his legal defense?
Tue Aug 27, 2013, 12:14 PM
Aug 2013

He did. Don't want to link it but it is out there. A couple of them.

If Zimmerman didn't pay his own fees then he has no standing to recover them (?). It is a double dip.

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
23. You'd think so...But Florida stopped making sense to me years ago...
Tue Aug 27, 2013, 12:17 PM
Aug 2013

They may as well put Zimmerman in the governor's mansion...He's a perfect example of how fucked up things are...

 

branford

(4,462 posts)
28. It would not be a double dip.
Tue Aug 27, 2013, 12:20 PM
Aug 2013

First, the law only covers legal expenses (copying, transcripts, experts, etc.), not his attorneys' fees.

More importantly, Zimmerman does not get to profit from the money. Either his lawyers will get paid for their expenses directly, or if Zimmerman has actually paid for the expenses, he will simple be reimbursed.

Lastly, it is my understanding that Zimmerman's defense fund will be used to pay his attorneys' fees. I would imagine that the amount of the attorneys' fees far outstrip the monies collected by the fund. If that is not the case, I do not know what would happen to any excess money in the fund.

 

whoiswithme

(35 posts)
30. I don't think he raised near enough to pay his whole bill.
Tue Aug 27, 2013, 12:27 PM
Aug 2013

The article I read this morning said his defense attorney spend 40 hours/week for 16 months working on his case at $400/hr. His assistant billed the same at $350/hr. That's $2m right there and the state won't pay for legal fees, just expert witnesses and recording costs, etc.

 

Jenoch

(7,720 posts)
77. If you were accused of
Tue Aug 27, 2013, 05:35 PM
Aug 2013

a crime and won acquittal at trial, would you not wish to avail yourself of this particular law?

MoonRiver

(36,926 posts)
86. Let me answer that question with two responses.
Tue Aug 27, 2013, 07:00 PM
Aug 2013

First, if I lived in a state stupid enough to offer that taxpayer ripoff, of course I would.

Second, if I had the option to either live in a state which did not have that option, which I do, or in one that is idiotic enough to have it, I would choose the former. I guess as a law abiding citizen I'm willing to take my chances and not be responsible for others' legal expenses.

 

Jenoch

(7,720 posts)
88. You seem to be assuming everyone who goes to trial is guilty as charged and
Tue Aug 27, 2013, 07:12 PM
Aug 2013

should lose everything they own defending themselves even if they did not commit the crime.

MoonRiver

(36,926 posts)
90. It is NOT the taxpayers' responsibility to refund everybody accused and acquitted!
Tue Aug 27, 2013, 07:33 PM
Aug 2013

If they were wrongfully accused let them sue the prosecutors.

X_Digger

(18,585 posts)
91. You can't sue a prosecutor for doing their job absent malice
Tue Aug 27, 2013, 07:42 PM
Aug 2013

The state (and its employees) have qualified immunity while doing their job.

Throd

(7,208 posts)
103. What if it were you?
Tue Aug 27, 2013, 10:31 PM
Aug 2013

Take Zimmerman out of the equation.

You would be OK with having to spend more time and money to sue the system in the hopes of recouping the money you spent defending yourself from charges in which you were finally acquitted?

MoonRiver

(36,926 posts)
104. I would deal with it. Nobody wants to pay out large sums of money, but it happens sometimes.
Thu Aug 29, 2013, 07:36 AM
Aug 2013

I'm a firm believer in housing, food and health care for all. But I draw the line at doling out money for legal fees.

 

Boom Sound 416

(4,185 posts)
89. How does that answer the question
Tue Aug 27, 2013, 07:15 PM
Aug 2013

In fact after reading that I think I just got a little dumber

'If I did something I already do then I would do it'

Abq_Sarah

(2,883 posts)
101. It's not a taxpayer ripoff
Tue Aug 27, 2013, 09:57 PM
Aug 2013

If the state can't prove their case, why should the defendant be punished with insane legal bills? Maybe the state should consider the cases it brings to trial and the strength of the evidence a little more closely.

 

Logical

(22,457 posts)
84. I agree. Great law. All states should have it. I think they should pay fair lawyer fees also. n-t
Tue Aug 27, 2013, 06:53 PM
Aug 2013

treestar

(82,383 posts)
105. How did it add up to that much?
Thu Aug 29, 2013, 07:46 AM
Aug 2013

And it apparently does not include attorney's fees. Can't recover those. So that just means costs. Like copying and postage. Expert witnesses charge a lot, but how many did he have and what did they charge? Outlandish.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»O'Mara: George Zimmerman ...