If the US attacks Syria, whom will you hold responsible?

[Dreamer Tatum]

If the US attacks Syria, regardless of method, duration, or intensity, whom will you hold responsible, regardless of the outcome?

10 votes, 1 pass | Time left: Unlimited
	President Obama alone
	3 (30%)
	"The Powers That Be", of which Obama isn't a member
	0 (0%)
	"The Powers That Be", of which Obama is certainly a member
	6 (60%)
	The "MIC"
	1 (10%)
	The "PNAC"
	0 (0%)
	Congress
	0 (0%)
	NATO and/or the UN
	0 (0%)
	Israel
	0 (0%)
	Assad
	0 (0%)
	Someone else or no one
	0 (0%)
	1 DU member did not wish to select any of the options provided.
Show usernames Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll

[barbtries]

1. i would like to be able to answer with more than one option.

but the MIC is closest to my belief. shit i'm so cynical at this point that i would believe it if it came out that the MIC was responsible for the sarin attack. they can't be too obscenely rich and war is how they get that way.

[Glassunion]

2. Dick Cheney?

[pscot]

3. If Obama says "No", it doesn't happen

If he says "yes", it's his war.

[Javaman]

4. What? no all of the above? nt

[quinnox]

5. President Obama, it is his call

I'm not saying there might not be shadowy stuff going on behind the scenes, but I have to go with the evidence before me, and that means it is his call as the commander-in-chief.

[cali]

6. The buck stops on the President's desk.

[Capt. Obvious]

7. Ralph Nader

[leftstreet]

8. What - no option for Obstructionist GOP?

Wow, so Obama won't have anyone to blame

[nolabels]

9. Other here

I blame the American People for being too lazy or uniformed to want to stop it.