Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
Wed Aug 28, 2013, 07:28 AM Aug 2013

Wind and rockets key clues in Syrian chemical puzzle



* * *

Who was responsible for launching the attack is another matter. The short-range rockets used to deliver it might provide clues. The inspectors will try to find and sample these, says Richard Guthrie, a chemical weapons specialist formerly with the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute in Sweden. They cannot address who launched them as this isn't in their mandate, but if you have a rocket with a 2-kilometre range, and you know where it landed, you can estimate where it came from, says Guthrie.

There are already some clues. He notes that the day of the attack was the one day that week when the wind blew from government-held central Damascus towards the rebel-held eastern suburbs. That and the apparent lack of army casualties suggest government involvement.

So can the West take any action to prevent more attacks? The US has in the past bombed chemical weapons stockpiles, and US destroyers are in range. But a low-intensity explosion, Guthrie says, will release chemicals, and some stockpiles could well be in populated areas. A high-energy blast still won't incinerate all the chemicals but it will lift any intact agents high up where they can spread hundreds of kilometres. Both types of strike are likely to kill people in the vicinity.

A study published last December shows that the bombing of Iraq's extensive chemical weapons plants early in the Gulf War in 1991 released sarin over military encampments 600 kilometres away, at doses Robert Haley of the University of Texas in Dallas says caused characteristic Gulf War illnesses and brain damage. Soldiers who were exposed were four times as likely to have symptoms as those who weren't.

With thousands, if not millions, of people within a few hundred kilometres of Syrian weapons sites, bombing them is an option foreign governments must weigh carefully.

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn24112-wind-and-rockets-key-clues-in-syrian-chemical-puzzle.html#.Uh3VYdK-pH8?utm_source=NSNS&utm_medium=SOC&utm_campaign=twitter&cmpid=SOC|NSNS|2012-GLOBAL-twitter
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Wind and rockets key clues in Syrian chemical puzzle (Original Post) morningfog Aug 2013 OP
Message auto-removed Name removed Aug 2013 #1
There are already some clues. GeorgeGist Aug 2013 #2

Response to morningfog (Original post)

GeorgeGist

(25,308 posts)
2. There are already some clues.
Wed Aug 28, 2013, 09:36 AM
Aug 2013
He notes that the day of the attack was the one day that week when the wind blew from government-held central Damascus towards the rebel-held eastern suburbs.


That claim appears to be untrue:

http://www.wunderground.com/history/airport/OSDI/2013/8/19/WeeklyHistory.html

Which to me is a clue that Richard Guthrie is bullshiting.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Wind and rockets key clue...